Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: INDICATORS AND SUB-INDICATORS CHARACTERIZING COMPETITIVENESS OF FORESTRY COMPANIES
INDICATORS AND SUB-INDICATORS CHARACTERIZING COMPETITIVENESS OF FORESTRY COMPANIES

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Konstantin Kolev; Nikolay Stoenchev; Nasko Iliev; Galin Milchev; Maya Tsoklinova
10.5593/sgem2022/3.1/s14.44
10.5593/sgem2022/3.1
1314-2704
978-619-7603-42-2
English
22
3.1
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Forest Ecosystems
In connection with elaboration of scientific project ‘Statistical study of forestry companies competitiveness’ and on the basis of the accumulated national and foreign experience a system of indicators and sub-indicators for complex quantitative assessment of forestry companies competitiveness has been offered. The proposed indicators are: competitiveness of product being offered; labor productivity; financial results; enterprise growth; market adaptability; economic realization of property of forest resources; silvicultural activities. In current paper are presented the scientific results from the verification of the offered indicators and sub-indicators reliability.1. The verification is carried out on the basis of questionnaire survey among specialists connected with forestry. The questionnaire includes two parts. Through the first one is checked the reliability of the system of indicators related with competitiveness of economic subjects that manage Bulgarian forest territories. By means of the second part is checked the reliability of the system of indicators connected with competitiveness of economic subjects engaged with timber harvesting and silvicultural activities in Bulgarian forest territories. On the grounds of the collected and processed data the initial system of indicators and sub-indicators is supplemented and improved.
[1] Becker, R., J. Berger, D. Glauser, D. Glauser, B. Jann. Experiments in the Sociology of Education - Promises and Experiences, Swiss Journal of Sociology, 48(1),pp 9-19, 2022.
[2] Beev, I. Za modeliraneto v ikonomikata. Sbornik dokladi ot nauchna konferentziya ‘Razvitie na bulgarskata ikonomika – 25 godini mejdu ochakvaniyata i realnostite’, Stopanska akademiya ‘D. Cenov’, Svishtov, 632 s., 2015.
[3] Bowen, G. Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method, Qualitative Research Journal, vol. 9, №2, pp 27-40, 2009. DOI: 103316/QRJ0902027
[4] Dimitrov, D. V. Upravlenie na konflikta. S., 232 s., 2005.
[5] Giddens, A. Sociology. Cambridge, 1989. Giddens, A. (1989). Sociology (pp 549 & 40). Cambridge: Polity Press.
[6] Igwe, I., A. Odii. Research Methods and Key Issues in Sociological Research. In book: Introduction to Sociology African Culture, Context and Complexity. Publishesher:Igbinedion University, Okada, pp 67-81.
[7] Jones, S., F. Murphy, M. Edwards, J. James. Doing things differently: advantages and disadvantages of Web questionary. Nurse Researches, 15 (4), pp 15-26, 2008.
[8] Kolev, K., N. Stoenchev, N. Iliev, G. Milchev, E. Stefanova. Theoretical and Conceptual Framework for Research on Competitiveness of Forestry Company, 21th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference – SGEM 2021, Albena, pp 657-664, 2021.
[9] Kawulich, B. Participant Observation as a Data Collection Method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol. 6 № 2, Art. 43, 29 p., 2005, ISSN 1438-5627.
[10] Mihaylov, S. Empirichnoto sociologichesko izsledvane. S., 387 s., 1980.
[11] Opdenakker, R. Advantages and Disadvantages of Four Interview Techniques in Qualitative Research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol. 7, № 4, Art. 11, 2006. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-7.4.175.
[12] Pachev, T., B. Kolev, V. Valov i dr. Ikonomicheska sociologiya. UI „Stopanstvo“ S., 422 s., 2005.
[13] R. Prabhu, C.Colfer, R. Dudley, Guidelines for Developing, Testing and Selecting Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management, Center for International Forestry Research, Jakarta, 183 p., 1999.
The publication contents results from research that is financed by Scientific and Research Sector (НИС) of University of Forestry – Sofia, contract № НИС-Б- 1140/05.04.2021.
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022/3.1/s14.44
Download PDF
Proceedings of 22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022
22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022, 04 - 10 July, 2022
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
357-364
04 - 10 July, 2022
website
8563
forestry, competitiveness, indicators, sub-indicators, questionnaire survey