Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: PALM NUTSHELL BIOCHAR QUALITY CORRELATION WITH PYROLYSIS TEMPERATURE
PALM NUTSHELL BIOCHAR QUALITY CORRELATION WITH PYROLYSIS TEMPERATURE

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Gracia Kayombo; Michel Kalenga Wa Kalenga
10.5593/sgem2022V/4.2/s18.13
10.5593/sgem2022V/4.2
1314-2704
978-619-7603-50-7
English
22
4.2
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Recycling
The threat caused by the use of generic carbonaceous material for carbothermic reduction to globe has increased. Millions are being invested to protect the environment due to the global warming. A new generation of reductants is urgently sought to mitigate the threat. Biochars improvement for different usages is currently looked at. One of the ways to produce biochar is pyrolysis. The temperature and type of atmosphere in the furnace used play an important role on the quality of biochar produced. The current paper investigates the effect of temperature on the quality of biochar produced from raw palm nutshells through pyrolysis. The temperature was varied from 500°C to 900oC while the size of particles fed into the furnace ranged from 5mm to19mm. The quality of the raw palm nutshell and the biochar were assessed through characterization using proximate analysis and SEM-EDS to quantify the amount of fixed carbon and pores sizes corresponding to different sizes of the palm nutshell treated. The trends of fixed carbon and the change in temperature as well as the pores sizes were assessed in all the biochars produced and the correlation established. A tube furnace was used for the experiments with argon being blown to keep an inert atmosphere and avoid any destruction of carbon. A further correlation between the size of particles and fixed carbon was also assessed and a correlation established.
[1] P. Bartocci, L. Wang, O. Skreiberg, F. Liberti, G. Bidini, and F. Fantozzi, “Biocarbon Production and Use as a Fuel,” in Production of materilas from sustainable biomass, 2019, pp. 295–324. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-3768-0_10.
[2] H. Mandova et al., “Possibilities for CO2 emission reduction using biomass in European integrated steel plants,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 115, no. October 2017, pp. 231–243, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.04.021.
[3] S. H. Kong, S. K. Loh, R. T. Bachmann, S. A. Rahim, and J. Salimon, “Biochar from oil palm biomass: A review of its potential and challenges,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 39. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 729–739, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.107.
[4] G. R. Surup, A. Trubetskaya, and M. Tangstad, “Charcoal as an alternative reductant in ferroalloy production: A review,” Processes, vol. 8, no. 11. MDPI AG, pp. 1–41, Nov. 01, 2020. doi: 10.3390/pr8111432.
[5] J. G. Mathieson, M. A. Somerville, A. Deev, and S. Jahanshahi, “Utilization of biomass as an alternative fuel in ironmaking,” in Iron Ore: Mineralogy, Processing and Environmental Sustainability, Elsevier Inc., 2015, pp. 581–613. doi: 10.1016/B978-1- 78242-156-6.00019-8.
[6] K. Weber and P. Quicker, “Properties of biochar,” Fuel, vol. 217, no. September 2017, pp. 240–261, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.054.
[7] G. R. Surup, A. Trubetskaya, and M. Tangstad, “Life cycle assessment of renewable reductants in the ferromanganese alloy production: A review,” Processes, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2021, doi: 10.3390/pr9010185.
[8] M. Sommerfeld and B. Friedrich, “Replacing fossil carbon in the production of ferroalloys with a focus on bio-based carbon: A review,” Minerals, vol. 11, no. 11, 2021, doi: 10.3390/min11111286.
[9] L. Leng et al., “An overview on engineering the surface area and porosity of biochar,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 763. Elsevier B.V., Apr. 01, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144204.
[10] C. Vasilatos, C. Dimitris, T. Theodorou, C. Stouraiti, M. Andreadi, and N. Koukouzas, “A Comparative Study of Selected Properties of Biomass and Coal Fuels from Greece,” in materials proceedings, 2022, vol. 5, no. 108, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.3390/materproc2021005108.
[11] N. S. Kamal Baharin et al., “Conversion and characterization of Bio-Coke from abundant biomass waste in Malaysia,” Renewable Energy, vol. 162, pp. 1017–1025, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.083.
[12] A. M. A. Campos and P. S. Assis, “Analysis of the Influence of Biomass Addition in Coal Mixture for Metallurgical Coke Production,” Global Journal of Researches in Engineering, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi: 10.34257/gjreevol21is2pg1.
[13] M. G. Montiano, E. Diaz-Faes, C. Barriocanal, and R. Alvarez, “Influence of biomass on metallurgical coke quality,” 2007.
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022V/4.2/s18.13
Download PDF
Proceedings of 22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022
22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022, 06-08 December, 2022
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
101-108
06-08 December, 2022
website
8830
Palm nutshell, temperature, fixed carbon, pores