Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: CHARACTERISATION OF THE ANTIMICROBIAL BEHAVIOUR OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND SALMONELLA SPP. STRAINS ISOLATED FROM PIGS IN THE WESTERN PART OF ROMANIA
CHARACTERISATION OF THE ANTIMICROBIAL BEHAVIOUR OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND SALMONELLA SPP. STRAINS ISOLATED FROM PIGS IN THE WESTERN PART OF ROMANIA

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Calin Ioan Hulea; Diana Obistioiu; Anca Hulea; Viorel Herman
10.5593/sgem2022V/6.2/s25.16
10.5593/sgem2022V/6.2
1314-2704
978-619-7603-52-1
English
22
6.2
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Advances in Biotechnology
The present study investigated the antimicrobial behaviour of E. coli and Salmonella spp. strains, isolated from pigs after their weaning age. Antimicrobial testing susceptibility by the Kirby-Bauer method allowed the identification of bacterial strains with multiple antibiotic resistance (58.02% for E. coli isolated strains and 47.27% for Salmonella isolated strains). Thus, it was noted that all 54 strains of E. coli showed resistance to trimethoprim; sulfathiazole with sulfacetamide and sulfabenzamide; sulphametoxazol with trimethoprim; ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid; more than 95% of the strains were resistant to streptomycin, ampicillin and kanamycin. Over 60% of Salmonella spp. strains were resistant to lincomycin, streptomycin, tetracycline, and flumequine. The lowest bactericidal activity was attributed to lincomycin, 90.90% of the Salmonella isolates being reistant to this antimicrobial. Regarding the sensitivity of E. coli isolated strains, over 85% showed sensitivity to ceftazidime, aztreonam and imipenem. Between 50% - 60% of Salmonella strains were sensitive to gentamicin, cefotaxime, and amikacin, while less than 50% of the isolates were susceptible to the rest of the studied antibiotics.
[1] Aidara-Kane A., Angulo F.J., Conly J.M., Minato Y., Silbergeld E.K., McEwen S.A., Collignon P.J., WHO Guideline Development Group, World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on use of medically important antimicrobials in food-producing animals, Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, vol. 7, article number 7, 2018.
[2] Burowa E., Rostalskib A., Harliziusc J., Ganglb A., Simoneita C., Grobbela M., Kollasa C., Tenhagena B.A., Kasbohrera A., Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs from birth to slaughter and its association with antibiotic treatment. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 165, pp. 52–62, 2019.
[3] Callens B., Cargnel M., Sarrazin S., Dewulf J., Hoet B., Vermeersch K., Wattiau P., Welby S., Associations between a decreased veterinary antimicrobial use and resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from Belgian livestock species (2011-2015). Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol.157, pp. 50–58, 2018.
[4] Chen X., Xu J., Ren E., Su Y., Zhu W., Co-occurrence of early gut colonisation in neonatal piglets with microbiota in the maternal and surrounding delivery environments. Anaerobe, vol. 49, pp. 30-40, 2018.
[5] Holmer I., Salomonsen C.M., Jorsal S.E., Astrup L.B., Jensen V.F., Borck B.H., Pedersen K., Antibiotic resistance in porcine pathogenic bacteria and relation to antibiotic usage, BMC Veterinary Research, vol. 15, article number 449, 2019.
[6] Jiang Z., Paudyal N., Xu Y., Deng T., Li F., Pan H., Peng X., He Q., Yue M., Antibiotic resistance profiles of Salmonella recovered from finishing pigs and slaughter facilities in Henan, China, Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 10, article number 15130, 2019.
[7] Lekagul A., Tangcharoensathien V., Yeung S., Patterns of antibiotic use in global pig production: A systematic review, Veterinary and Animal Science, vol. 7, article number 100058, 2019.
[8] Lunha K., Leangapichart T., Jiwakanon J., Angkititrakul S., Sunde M., Jarhult J.D., Hallenberg G.S., Hickman R.A., Van Boeckel T., Magnusson U., Antimicrobial resistance in faecal Escherichia coli from humans and pigs at farms at different levels of intensification, Antibiotics, vol. 9/issue10, article number 662, 2020.
[9] Monger X.C., Gilbert A.A., Saucier L., Vincent A.T., Antibiotic resistance: from pig to meat, Antibiotics (Basel), vol. 10/issue 10, article number 1209, 2021.
[10] Najjuka C.F., Kateete D.P., Kajumbula H.M., Joloba M.L., Essack Sabiha Y., Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from outpatients in urban and rural districts of Uganda, BMC Research Notes, vol. 9, article number 235, 2016.
[11] Sarrazin S., Joosten P., Van Gompel L., Luiken R.E.C., Mevius D.J., Wagenaar J.A., Heederik D.J.J., Dewulf J. EFFORT consortium, Quantitative and qualitative analysis of antimicrobial usage patterns in 180 selected farrow-to-finish pig farms from nine European countries based on single batch and purchase data, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 74/issue 3, pp. 807-816, 2019.
[12] Szucs, I.., Vida V., Global tendencies in pork meat – production, trade and consumption, Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, vol. 11/issue 3-4, pp. 105– 111, 2017.
[13] Waluszewski A., Cinti A., Perna A., Antibiotics in pig meat production: restrictions as the odd case and overuse as normality? Experiences from Sweden and Italy, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 8, article number 172, 2021.
[14] Weber N.R., Nielsen J.P., Jorsal S.E.L., Haugegaard S., Denwood M.J., Pedersen K.S., Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in E. coli isolated from rectal and floor samples in pens with diarrhoeic nursery pigs in Denmark, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 147, pp. 42–49, 2017.
[15] Zimmerman, J.J., Karriker L.A., Ramirez A., Schwartz K.J., Stevenson G.W., Zhang J., Diseases of Swine - Eleventh Edition, ISBN 9781119350859, Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken/New Jersey, U.S.A., 2019.
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022V/6.2/s25.16
Download PDF
Proceedings of 22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022
22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022, 06-08 December, 2022
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
121-128
06-08 December, 2022
website
8911
antimicrobial susceptibility, weaning colibacillosis, swine salmonellosis