Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: PATHOGENIC POLLUTION OF CROPS CAUSING BY CHIKEN MANURE BASED FERTILIZERS
PATHOGENIC POLLUTION OF CROPS CAUSING BY CHIKEN MANURE BASED FERTILIZERS

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Gulnaz Galieva; Kamalya Karamova; Polina Galitskaya; Svetlana Selivanovskaya
10.5593/sgem2022V/6.2/s25.33
10.5593/sgem2022V/6.2
1314-2704
978-619-7603-52-1
English
22
6.2
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Advances in Biotechnology
Chicken manure is one of the most wide spread waste worldwide. One of its hazardous properties is contamination with live pathogens or pathogens’ spores. Being introduced into soil for fertilization, fresh, cured or treated manure can cause soil contamination with those pathogens. Further, transmission of the pathogens through soil and plant tissues to human or animal food is possible. The objective of the present work was to reveal the level of pathogenic contamination of wheat grains cultivated on soil that was previously treated with cured chicken manure. Two types of manures M1 and M2 sampled from the large poultry farms situated in Russia were used to fertilize soil and obtain wheat grains (samples G1 and G2, respectively). Grains obtained with mineral fertilizers were used as a control (G0). Among 10 pathogenic bacterial species investigated, 6 were detected in both M1 and M2 samples - Listeria monocytogenes, Mycobacterium paratuberculosis,, Enterococus spp,, Campylobacter jejuni,, Bacillus anthracis,, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, the gene copy numbers for those bacteria revealed using RT-PCR was found to range between 2.22*104 and 1.19*108 gene copies per g manure. 5 of those species, except of C. jejuni, were also detected in both types of grains, while the gene copies number were found to be lower, thus they ranged between 1.45*103 and 8.81*103 copies per g grain. No bacterial pathogens were detected in G0 sample. Viral particles of bursal disease virus and avian orthoreovirus were not found either in manures nor in grains. It can be concluded that the risk of pathogenic transmission from the manures to grains exists, and that higher attention should be paid on their treatment to avoid the secondary infection of livestock and human.
[1] Drozdz D., Wystalska K., Malinska K., Grosser A., Grobelak A., Kacprzak M., Management of poultry manure in Poland – Current state and future perspectives, Journal of Environmental Management, vol.264, pp 110327, 2020.
[2] Billet L., Pesce S., Martin-Laurent F., Devers-Lamrani M. Experimental Evidence for Manure-Borne Bacteria Invasion in Soil During a Coalescent Event: Influence of the Antibiotic Sulfamethazine, Microbial Ecology, vol.1, pp 1–10, 2022.
[3] Black Z., Balta I., Black Lisa., Naughton, P. J., Dooley, J. S.G., Corcionivoschi, NicolaeThe Fate of Foodborne Pathogens in Manure Treated Soil, Frontiers in Microbiology, vol.12, pp 3873, 2021.
[4] Liu H. J., Lee L. H., Hsu H. W., Kuo L. C., Liao M. H. Molecular evolution of avian reovirus:: evidence for genetic diversity and reassortment of the S-class genome segments and multiple cocirculating lineages, Virology, vol.314, pp 336–349, 2003.
[5] Techera C., Tomas G., Panzera Y., Banda A., Perbolianachis P., Perez Ruben., Marandino A., Development of real-time PCR assays for single and simultaneous detection of infectious bursal disease virus and chicken anemia virus, Molecular and Cellular Probes, vol.43, pp 58–63, 2019.
[6] Tuntufye H. N., Lebeer S., Gwakisa P. S., Goddeeris B. M. Identification of Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli genes that are induced in vivo during infection in chickens, Applied and environmental microbiology, vol.78, pp 3343–3351, 2012.
[7] Dhama K. Verma, Amit K., Rajagunalan S., Kumar A., Tiwari R., Chakraborty S., Kumar R., Listeria monocytogenes infection in poultry and its public health importance with special reference to food borne zoonoses, Pakistan journal of biological sciences : PJBS, vol.16, pp 301–308, 2013.
[8] Cong F. Zhu Y., Wang J., Lian Y., Liu X., Xiao L., Huang R., Zhang Y., Chen M., Guo P., A multiplex xTAG assay for the simultaneous detection of five chicken immunosuppressive viruses 11 Medical and Health Sciences 1108 Medical Microbiology 06 Biological Sciences 0605 Microbiology, BMC Veterinary Research, vol.14, pp 1–8, 2018.
[9] Al-Ebshahy E., Mohamed S., Abas O. First report of seroprevalence and genetic characterization of avian orthoreovirus in Egypt, Tropical Animal Health and Production, vol.52, pp 1049–1054, 2020.
[10] Muyzer G., De Waal E. C., Uitterlinden A. G. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA., Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol.59, pp 695, 1993.
[11] Biktasheva L., Kuryntseva P., Glazunova D., Selivanovskaya S. Comparison of two thermal methods of chicken manure treatment, International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, vol.19, pp 669–676, 2019.
[12] Tang Y., Lu H. Whole genome alignment based one-step real-time RT-PCR for universal detection of avian orthoreoviruses of chicken, pheasant and turkey origins, Infection, Genetics and Evolution, vol.39, pp 120–126, 2016.
[13] Compant S., Samad A., Faist H., Sessitsch A. A review on the plant microbiome: Ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application, Journal of Advanced Research, vol.19, pp 29–37, 2019.
[14] Yang Q., Ren S., Niu T., Guo Y., Qi S., Han X., Liu D., Pan F., Distribution of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in chicken manure and manure-fertilized vegetables, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol.21, pp 1231–1241, 2014.
[15] Pachepsky Y. A. Sadeghi A. M., Bradford S. A., Shelton D. R., Guber A. K., Dao T., Transport and fate of manure-borne pathogens: Modeling perspective, Agricultural Water Management, vol.86, pp 81–92, 2006.
The work is carried out in accordance with the Strategic Academic Leadership Program «Priority 2030» of the Kazan Federal University of the Government of the Russian Federation.
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022V/6.2/s25.33
Download PDF
Proceedings of 22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022
22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022, 06-08 December, 2022
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
249-258
06-08 December, 2022
website
8927
Pathogenic pollution of crops, infectious bursal disease virus, avian orthoreovirus, chicken manure, pathogenic bacteria