Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: DETERMINISTIC EARTHQUAKE SCENARIO FOR THE CITY OF SOFIA
DETERMINISTIC EARTHQUAKE SCENARIO FOR THE CITY OF SOFIA

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Dimcho Solakov; Stela Simeonova; Plamena Raykova
10.5593/sgem2024/1.1/s05.61
10.5593/sgem2024/1.1
1314-2704
978-619-7603-67-5
English
24
1.1
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
5.Applied and Environmental Geophysics
In the present study a set of two deterministic earthquake scenarios (expressed in peak ground acceleration and macroseismic intensity MSK) are generated for the city of Sofia - the capital of Bulgaria. The study is guided by the perception that usable and realistic, based on both local seismic history and tectonic setting, ground motion maps to be produced for urban area.
The city is situated in the center of the Sofia area that is the most populated (the population is of more than 1.2 mil. inhabitants), industrial and cultural region of Bulgaria that faces considerable earthquake risk.
The contemporary tectonic activity of the Sofia area is predominantly associated with marginal faults of Sofia graben. In the study the local ground shaking levels are computed using the six ground-motion models selected (GMPE’s) for tectonically active regions. The scenario maps account for soil amplification effects using the geotechnical zonation of the considered urban area. Two scenario earthquakes are considered: earthquake with magnitudes MW6.5 occurred at the active fault located south of the city of Sofia (along the northern margin of the Vitosha Mountain) and MW7.0 quake (occurred at the fault located northern of the city). The MW6.5 event is the “true” historical 1858 earthquake with the strongest seismic impact on the city of Sofia.
The assessment of seismic hazard and generation of earthquake scenarios is the first link in the prevention chain and the first step in the evaluation of the seismic risk. The implementation of the earthquake scenarios into the policies for seismic risk reduction will allow focusing on the prevention of earthquake effects rather than on intervention following the disasters.
[1] Faccioli E. and Pessina V., WP2 Basis of a handbook of earthquake ground motions scenarios, RISK-UE, EVK4-CT-2000-00014, 2003.
[2] Faccioli, E., Seismic hazard assessment for derivation of earthquake scenarios in Risk-UE, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 4, 4, 341-364, 2006.
[3] Jackson J., McKenzie D. The relationship between plate motions and seismic moment tensors, and the rates of active deformation in the Mediterranean and Middle East. Geophysical Journal 93, 45–73, 1988.
[4] Solakov D., Simeonova S., Trifonova P., Georgiev I., Raykova P., Metodiev M., Aleksandrova I., Building Seismic Risk Management, Part 2: Regional seismotectonic model and model of seismic sources. BAS Publ. House, S., 21-45, 2019 (in Bulgarian).
[5] Petkov, I. and Christoskov L., On seismicity in the region of the town of Sofia concerning the macroseismic zoning, Annali Sofia Univ., 58, 163-179, 1965.
[6] Watzof, S., Earthquakes in Bulgaria during XIX century. Central Meteorological Station, Imprimerie de I?Etat, Sofia, pp 93, 1902 (in Bulgarian and French).
[7] Simeonova S., Solakov D., Aleksandrova I., Raykova P., Protopopova V., The 2012 Mw5.6 earthquake in Sofia seismic zone and some characteristics of the aftershock sequence. Bulgarian Chemical Communications, 47, Special Issue B, 398–405, 2015.
[8] Basili R., Kastelic V., Demircioglu M., Garcia Moreno D., Nemser E., et al., The European Database of Seismogenic Faults (EDSF) compiled in the framework of the Project SHARE. Available at http://diss.rm.ingv.it/share-edsf/, doi: 10.6092/INGV.IT-SHARE-EDSF, 2013.
[9] Worden, C.B., Wald D. J., Sanborn J., and Thompson E. M., Development of an open-source hybrid global Vs30 model, Seismological Society of America Annual Meeting, 21-23 April, Pasadena, California. 2015.
[10] Scherbaum, F., Delavaud E. and Riggelsen C., Model Selection in Seismic Hazard Analysis: An Information-Theoretic Perspective, BSSA, 99(6), pp. 3234–3247, 2009.
[11] Delavaud E, Scherbaum F., Kuhn N., Allen T., Testing the Global Applicability of Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Active Shallow Crustal Regions. Bull. Of the Seism Soc. of America, 102(2):707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1785/0120110113, 2012.
This work has been carried out in the framework of the National Science Program “Environmental Protection and Reduction of Risks of Adverse Events and Natural Disasters” approved by the Resolution of the Council of Ministers № 577/17.08.2018 and supported by the Ministry of Education and Science (MES) of Bulgaria (Agreement № Д01-27/06.02.2024).
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2024/1.1/s05.61
Download PDF
Proceedings of 24th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2024
24th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2024, 1 - 7 July, 2024
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Russian Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Russian Acad Arts; Turkish Acad Sci.
483-490
1 - 7 July, 2024
website
9889
deterministic scenario, Sofia seismogenic zone, the city of Sofia

25th SGEM International Conference on Earth & Planetary Sciences


International GeoConference SGEM2025
27 June - 6 July, 2025 / Albena, Bulgaria

Read More		   

SGEM Vienna GREEN "Green Science for Green Life"


Extended Scientific Sessions SGEM Vienna GREEN
3 -6 December, 2025 / Vienna, Austria

Read More
   

A scientific platform for Art-Inspired Scientists!


The Magical World Where Science meets Art
Vienna, Austria

Read More