Scholarly record
COMPARING OF APPROXIMATIONS OF MAGNETIZATION CURVES FOR NUMERICAL MODELING OF EDDY CURRENTS FIELDS
Abstract
The modeling of eddy currents in ferromagnetic materials is impossible without information about magnetic field induction dependence of it intensity (magnetization curve). Experimental definition of magnetization curves related to technical difficulties. As a rule, reference information of that curves contains a small amount of knowledge and not applicable for direct application. In this regard the transition from original magnetization curve to its approximation is relevant. The purpose of a research is in the choice of optimal approximation way from the calculation of eddy currents point of view. Three different types of magnetization curves approximations are considering in article: Frolich, Melgui and universal Pentegov approximations. Comparing of approximations was conducted on the base of a standard deviation from original magnetization curve criteria, difference of magnetic coenegies criterion and calculation of active power error. The experimental data of magnetization of materials with different properties was used for comparative analysis. It is shown that the minimum error in calculation of eddy currents is provided by universal approximation. A replacement of magnetization curve by other approximations can lead to increasing of active power error up to 15%. The obtained results can be used for non-stationary electromagnetic analysis of complex technical systems for calculation of heat dissipation from eddy currents in ferromagnetic materials.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References10
Glebov A.O., Karpov S.V., Karpushkin S.V., A comparison of modeling techniques for temperature fields of inductive heating plates, Automation and Remote Control, Russian Federation, 2014, Vol. 75, No. 6, pp 1120-1129;
Janus R.I., Magnitnaja defektoskopija [Magnetic nondestructive testing], 1946;
Lim K.K., Hammond P., Universal loss chart for the calculation of eddy-current losses in thick steel plates, Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1970, Vol. 117, No. 4, pp 857-864;
Matjuk V.F., Osipov A.A., Matematicheskie modeli krivoj namagnichivanija i petel' magnitnogo gisterezisa. Chast' I. Analiz modelej. Nerazrushajushhij kontrol' i diagnostika [Mathematical models of the magnetization curve and the magnetic hysteresis loop. Part I. Analysis of models. Non-destructive testing and diagnostics], 2011, No. 2, pp 3-35;
Pentegov I.V., Krasnozhon A.V., Vlijanie parametrov ferromagnitnoj sredy na velichinu sostavljajushhih poverhnostnogo impedansa, Jelektrotehnika i jelektromehanika [Influence of the parameters of the ferromagnetic medium on the value of the components of the surface impedance. Electrical Engineering and Electromechanics], 2007, No. 2, pp 65-69;
http://magweb.us/free-bh-curves/
Strjetton Dzh.A., Teorija jelektromagnetizma [Theory of electromagnetism], 1948;
Uajt D., Vudson G., Jelektromehanicheskoe preobrazovanie jenergii [Electromechanical energy conversion], 1964;
Paoli G., Bíró O., Buchgraber G., Complex representation in nonlinear time harmonic eddy current problems, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1998, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp 2625-2628;
Coulomb J.L., Sabonnadière J.C., CAO en électrotechnique, 1985.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
