Scholarly record
PRO-ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOUR DEVELOPMENTS LOCALLY: ECO-SCHOOLS COMPLEMENTARY COMMUNICATION INSTRUMENTS FOR GREENING COMMUNITY
Abstract
When aiming to study pro-environmental behavior (PEB) developments at the local municipal level in Latvia, there were two complementary studies employed: 1- main local stakeholder groups interviewing in two town municipalities to study their existing PEB practice, especially obstacles and related municipal governance instruments; 2- questionnaire for about 100 Eco-schools (EcoS) coordinators in Latvia to study schools existing PEB practice within school grounds, but especially their orientation towards and collaboration with local community and with the whole municipality towards PEB in the public environment. In spite of existing, at least basic, knowledge and even motivation (willingness) to act environmentally friendly, there are a range of obstacles, which could be classified in groups and, complementary, directly associated also with six classes of governance instruments to employ to overcome those obstacles пїЅ infrastructure instruments, economic-financial, communication ones, as well as administrative, planning, political and legal instruments. Even infrastructure and economic-financial obstacles are mentioned as dominating, they are not always limiting as often are the communication, particularly, psychological obstacles, what means that efficient and complementary development of various communication instruments as information and education, participation and PEB application/demonstration into practice can make a change, particularly when targeting main stakeholder groups selectively. This locally based PEB change could be importantly facilitated comparatively effectively by EcoS employing communication-psychological instruments, incl. PEB, as have been demonstrated by selected EcoS pro-community activities examples and their evaluations. Activities, projects and campaigns of EcoS and studentsпїЅ behavior also in their households are not only supporting formal environmental education, but also triggering often non-active municipal leaders and managers towards necessary change into EcoS immediate community, and more and more so impacting also whole municipal PEB.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References12
Annual Report 2015, Foundation for Environmental Education (FEE) Latvia, 2016
Brulle R. From Environmental Campaigns to Public Dialog: Environmental Communication for Engagement, Environmental Communication, 4:1, 82-98, 2010,
Ernsteins, R. Environmental Communication. Manual. University of Latvia, Riga, 2003. 87 p. (based on Ernšteins R. Environmental science education development (in Latvian). Monography, Publisher “Vide”, Riga, 1999, 342 p.)
Ministry of Environmental Protection, Latvia Republic. National Environmental communication and education strategy, 2001, 34p.
Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 407–424.
Ernsteins R., Lagzdiņa E., Stals A. Environmental communication imperative for pro-environmental municipal development: complementary instruments, sector approach, integration requirements (in Latvian). Proceedings, 18th International scientific conference, Liepaja University, Liepaja, Latvia, 2016. 338-354 pp.
McBeth W., Volk T. The National Environmental Literacy Project: A Baseline Study of Middle Grade Students in the United States. The Journal of Environmental Education. 41(1), 55–67, 2010, DOI: 10.1080/00958960903210031
Brizga J. (2016). Sustainable Household Consumption in Latvia: Environmental Behaviour and Communication Requirement, 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2016, Conference Proceedings, 2016, Book 1 Vol., Vienna. 543-554 pp.
Blake, J. (1999). Overcoming the 'value-action gap' in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 4 (3), P. 257–278.
Beierle, T. C., Cayford, J. (2002). Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions. Resources for the Future. 149 p.
Godemann J, Michelsen G (eds) Sustainability communication: interdisciplinary perspectives and theoretical foundation. Springer, Berlin, 2011
Alsop R. Et al. Empowerment in practice: from analysis to implementation.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
