SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

STRENGTH REDUCTION FACTORS FOR ROMANIAN VRANCEA EARTHQUAKES: GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS AND PECULIARITIES

Craifaleanu, Iolanda-Gabriela

First published: 2013-06-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2013/ba1.v2/s05.027View metrics

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Citations
  • CrossRef - Citation Indexes: 1
  • Scopus - Citation Indexes: 1
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 2
PLUMX see details

Publication details

Title
STRENGTH REDUCTION FACTORS FOR ROMANIAN VRANCEA EARTHQUAKES: GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS AND PECULIARITIES
Authors
Craifaleanu, Iolanda-Gabriela
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 13th SGEM GeoConference on SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGIES IN GEOLOGY, EXPLORATION AND MINING
Publisher
Stef92 Technology
Year
2013
Pages
887 - 894 pp
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
Not available yet
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
References46

  1. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998-1 :2004, Doc. CEN/TC250/SC8/N317, European Committee for Standardization, Belgium, 2004.

  2. ASCE 7-10 . Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, USA, 2010.

  3. Mwafy A. M. & Elnashai A. S. Calibration of force reduction factors of RC buildings, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, USA, Vol. 6, Issue 2, pp. 239-273, 2002.

  4. Miranda, E. & Bertero V. V. Evaluation of Strength Reduction Factors for Earthquake-Resistant Design, Earthquake Spectra, USA, Vol. 10, Issue 2, p p. 357-379, 1994.

  5. Uang C.-M. Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd Factors for Building Seismic Provisions, Journal of Structural Engineering, USA, Vol. 117, No. 1, pp. 19-28, 1991.

  6. SEAOC Seismology Committee. A Brief Guide to Seismic Design Factors , Structure, USA, pp. 30-32, September 2008. http://www.structuremag.org /Archives/2008-9/C-GuestCol-SeismicDesign-SEAOC-Sept08.pdf, last accessed March 2013.

  7. Craifaleanu I. G. Contributions to the study of the inelastic seismic response of reinforced concrete structures, PhD Thesis, Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest, Romania, 1996 (in Romanian).

  8. Craifaleanu I. G. Studies on response modification factors for Vrancea earthquakes. Buletinul AICPS , Bucharest, Romania, No. 2, 1998, p p. 34-40 (in Romanian).

  9. Craifaleanu I. G. Studies on inelastic response spectra for Vrancea earthquakes. Buletinul AICPS, Bucharest, Romania, No. 3, 1999, pp. 62-68 (in Romanian).

  10. Craifaleanu I. G. Nonlinear single degree-of-freedom models in earthquake engineering, Matrix Rom, Bucharest, Romania, 2005 (in Romanian).

  11. Lai S. P. & Biggs J. M., Inelastic Response Spectra for Aseismic Building Design, Journal of the Structural Division, USA, Vol. 106, No. 6, pp. 1295-1310, 1980.

  12. Newmark N. M. & Hall W. J. Earthquake Spectra and Design , Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, California, USA, 1982.

  13. Krawinkler H. & Nassar A. A. Seismic design based on ductility and cumulative damage demands and capacities. In: Nonlinear Seismic Analysis and Design o f Reinforced Concrete Buildings, P. Fajfar, H. Krawinkler Eds., Elsevier Applied Science, London, United Kingdom, pp. 95-104, 1992. Section Applied and Environmental Geophysics

  14. Rahnama, M. & Krawinkler H. Effects of soft soil and hysteresis model on seismic demands. Report No. 108. The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, USA, 1993.

  15. Vidic T., Fajfar P. & Fischinger M. Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics , USA, Vol. 23, Issue 5, pp. 507-521, 1994.

  16. Chopra A. K. & Goel R. K. Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating se ismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems, Report No. PEER-1999/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, USA, 1999 .

  17. Miranda E. Evaluation of Site-Dependent Inelastic Seismic Design Spectra, Journal of Structural Engineering, USA, Vol. 119, Issue 5, pp. 1319-1338, 1993.

  18. E. Miranda. Site-Dependent Strength Reduction Factors. J ournal of Structural Engineering, USA, Vol. 119, Issue 12, 1993, pp. 3503-3519.

  19. Lungu D., Cornea T., Craifaleanu I. & Demetriu S. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for inelastic structures on soft soils, Proceedings of the 11 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering , Acapulco, Mexico, June 23-28, 1996, Paper No. 1768, Elsevier Science, Pergamon, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1996.

  20. Cartwright D. E. & Longuet-Higgins M. S. The statistical distribution of the maxima of a random function, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London , Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, United Kingdom, Vol. 237, No. 1209, 1956, pp. 212-232.

  21. JCSS: Probabilistic Model Code, T he Joint Committee on Structural Safety , 2001, http://www.jcss.ethz.ch/, last accessed February 2013.

  22. Sandi H. & Borcia I. S. A Summary of Instrumental Data on the Recent Strong Vr ancea Earthquakes, and Implications for Seismic Hazard, Pure and Applied Geophysics, Switzerland, Vol. 168, Issue 3-4, pp. 659-694, 2011.

  23. Craifaleanu I. G. An Assessment of the Relevance of Parameters Used for Ground Motion Frequency Content Characterization with Application to Vrancea Subcrustal Earthquakes, Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 15WCEE, Paper No. 628, Lisbon, Portugal, Sept. 24-28, 2012. GeoConference on Science and Technologies in Geology, Exploration and Mining

  24. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998-1 :2004, Doc. CEN/TC250/SC8/N317, European Committee for Standardization, Belgium, 2004.

  25. ASCE 7-10 . Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, USA, 2010.

  26. Mwafy A. M. & Elnashai A. S. Calibration of force reduction factors of RC buildings, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, USA, Vol. 6, Issue 2, pp. 239-273, 2002.

  27. Miranda, E. & Bertero V. V. Evaluation of Strength Reduction Factors for Earthquake-Resistant Design, Earthquake Spectra, USA, Vol. 10, Issue 2, p p. 357-379, 1994.

  28. Uang C.-M. Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd Factors for Building Seismic Provisions, Journal of Structural Engineering, USA, Vol. 117, No. 1, pp. 19-28, 1991.

  29. SEAOC Seismology Committee. A Brief Guide to Seismic Design Factors , Structure, USA, pp. 30-32, September 2008. http://www.structuremag.org /Archives/2008-9/C-GuestCol-SeismicDesign-SEAOC-Sept08.pdf, last accessed March 2013.

  30. Craifaleanu I. G. Contributions to the study of the inelastic seismic response of reinforced concrete structures, PhD Thesis, Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest, Romania, 1996 (in Romanian).

  31. Craifaleanu I. G. Studies on response modification factors for Vrancea earthquakes. Buletinul AICPS , Bucharest, Romania, No. 2, 1998, p p. 34-40 (in Romanian).

  32. Craifaleanu I. G. Studies on inelastic response spectra for Vrancea earthquakes. Buletinul AICPS, Bucharest, Romania, No. 3, 1999, pp. 62-68 (in Romanian).

  33. Craifaleanu I. G. Nonlinear single degree-of-freedom models in earthquake engineering, Matrix Rom, Bucharest, Romania, 2005 (in Romanian).

  34. Lai S. P. & Biggs J. M., Inelastic Response Spectra for Aseismic Building Design, Journal of the Structural Division, USA, Vol. 106, No. 6, pp. 1295-1310, 1980.

  35. Newmark N. M. & Hall W. J. Earthquake Spectra and Design , Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, California, USA, 1982.

  36. Krawinkler H. & Nassar A. A. Seismic design based on ductility and cumulative damage demands and capacities. In: Nonlinear Seismic Analysis and Design o f Reinforced Concrete Buildings, P. Fajfar, H. Krawinkler Eds., Elsevier Applied Science, London, United Kingdom, pp. 95-104, 1992. Section Applied and Environmental Geophysics

  37. Rahnama, M. & Krawinkler H. Effects of soft soil and hysteresis model on seismic demands. Report No. 108. The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, USA, 1993.

  38. Vidic T., Fajfar P. & Fischinger M. Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics , USA, Vol. 23, Issue 5, pp. 507-521, 1994.

  39. Chopra A. K. & Goel R. K. Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating se ismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems, Report No. PEER-1999/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, USA, 1999 .

  40. Miranda E. Evaluation of Site-Dependent Inelastic Seismic Design Spectra, Journal of Structural Engineering, USA, Vol. 119, Issue 5, pp. 1319-1338, 1993.

  41. E. Miranda. Site-Dependent Strength Reduction Factors. J ournal of Structural Engineering, USA, Vol. 119, Issue 12, 1993, pp. 3503-3519.

  42. Lungu D., Cornea T., Craifaleanu I. & Demetriu S. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for inelastic structures on soft soils, Proceedings of the 11 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering , Acapulco, Mexico, June 23-28, 1996, Paper No. 1768, Elsevier Science, Pergamon, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1996.

  43. Cartwright D. E. & Longuet-Higgins M. S. The statistical distribution of the maxima of a random function, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London , Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, United Kingdom, Vol. 237, No. 1209, 1956, pp. 212-232.

  44. JCSS: Probabilistic Model Code, T he Joint Committee on Structural Safety , 2001, http://www.jcss.ethz.ch/, last accessed February 2013.

  45. Sandi H. & Borcia I. S. A Summary of Instrumental Data on the Recent Strong Vr ancea Earthquakes, and Implications for Seismic Hazard, Pure and Applied Geophysics, Switzerland, Vol. 168, Issue 3-4, pp. 659-694, 2011.

  46. Craifaleanu I. G. An Assessment of the Relevance of Parameters Used for Ground Motion Frequency Content Characterization with Application to Vrancea Subcrustal Earthquakes, Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 15WCEE, Paper No. 628, Lisbon, Portugal, Sept. 24-28, 2012. GeoConference on Science and Technologies in Geology, Exploration and Mining

Citing literature

Number of times cited according to Crossref: 1

Open DOICrossref metadataOpenCitations
View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list