Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +



Title: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS AND QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND IMPACTS OF THE SEAWEED SECTOR IN THE BALTIC SEA REGION

A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS AND QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND IMPACTS OF THE SEAWEED SECTOR IN THE BALTIC SEA REGION
Inese Skapste; Gunta Grinberga-Zalite; Andra Zvirbule; Ilze Vircava; Kristiana Skutele
10.5593/sgem2025/5.1
1314-2704
English
25
5.1
• Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA• Prof. DSc. Ildiko Tulbure, GERMANY• Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE
This analysis examines the regulatory framework for the seaweed sector and its impact in the Baltic Sea region through a systematic literature review and quantitative approach. The study assessed legislation and policy documents at four levels of governance: international, European Union, regional and national. The aim of the study was to provide a comprehensive overview of the legal framework for the seaweed sector, to identify the main trends and challenges, and to assess its potential impact on the development and environmental aspects of the sector. The quantitative analysis showed a significant potential of the seaweed sector after the introduction of the regulation, including CO2 sequestration (367 098 – 429 318 t CO2/year), economic development (1 593 – 1 863 billion €/year) and nutrient production (7 021 – 8 211 t N/year and 501.5 – 586.5 t P/year). However, the regulatory framework has the potential to reduce the size of the sector by approximately 15% and its economic value by 10%. The study concludes that a balanced regulatory approach is important for the sustainable development of the seaweed industry in the Baltic Sea region, stressing the need for adaptive regulation that promotes both environmental protection and economic growth.
[1] Skapste I., Grinberga-Zalite G., Dobele A., The potential of Baltic Sea algae as an agricultural resource enhancing sustainability in Latvia, Research for Rural Development, Latvia, vol. 39, pp 202-208, 2024, DOI: 10.22616/rrd.30.2024.029
[2] Araújo R., Calderón F., López J.S., Azevedo I.C., Bruhn A., Fluch S., Garcia Tasende M., Ghaderiardakani F., Ilmjärv T., Laurans M., Mac Monagail M., Mangini S., Peteiro C., Rebours C., Stefánsson T., Ullmann J., Current Status of the Algae Production Industry in Europe: An Emerging Sector of the Blue Bioeconomy, Frontiers in Marine Science, vol. 7, 626389, 2021, DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2020.626389.
[3] Camia A., Giuntoli J., Jonsson R., Robert N., Cazzaniga N.E., Jasinevicius G., Avitabile V., Grassi G., Barredo J.I., Mubareka S., The use of woody biomass for energy production in the EU, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2021, ISBN 978-92-76-27867-2, DOI: 10.2760/831621.
[4] Hasselström L., Visch W., Gröndahl F., Nylund G.M., Pavia H., The impact of seaweed cultivation on ecosystem services - a case study from the west coast of Sweden, Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 153, 110998, 2020, DOI: 10.1016/j. marpolbul. 2020.110998.
[5] Campbell D., Burgess E., Peacock K., Clavelle T., Lau W., Gray A., Roche R., Costello C., Global Fishing Watch: Bringing Transparency to Global Commercial Fisheries, Frontiers in Marine Science, vol. 8, 703991, 2021, DOI: 10.3389 /fmars. 2021.703991.
[6] Stelzenmüller V., Cormier R., Gee K., Shucksmith R., Gubbins M., Yates K.L., Morf A., Nic Aonghusa C., Mikkelsen E., Tweddle J.F., Pecceu E., Kannen A., Clarke S.A., Evaluation of marine spatial planning requires fit for purpose monitoring strategies, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 278, 111545, 2021, DOI: 10.1016/j. jenvman.2020.111545.
[7] Van Beijnen J., Antunes Zapelini C., Baulcomb C., Bush S.R., Aquaculture governance indicators: Addressing the public-private divide in rule-making, Aquaculture, vol. 546, 737304, 2022, DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737304.
[8] Froehlich H.E., Afflerbach J.C., Frazier M., Halpern B.S., Blue Growth Potential to Mitigate Climate Change through Seaweed Offsetting, Current Biology, vol. 30, pp 3664-3669, 2020, DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.07.046.
[9] Buschmann A.H., Camus C., Infante J., Neori A., Israel Á., Hernández-González M.C., Pereda S.V., Gomez-Pinchetti J.L., Golberg A., Tadmor-Shalev N., Critchley A.T., Seaweed production: overview of the global state of exploitation, farming and emerging research activity, European Journal of Phycology, vol. 52, pp 391-406, 2021, DOI: 10.1080/09670262.2017.1365175.
[10] Jiang Z., Liu J., Li S., Chen Y., Du P., Zhu Y., Liao Y., Chen Q., Shou L., Yan X., Liu J., Ye F., Economic potential of seaweed cultivation for carbon capture in China, Science of The Total Environment, vol. 843, 156905, 2022, DOI: 10.1016/j. scitotenv.2022.156905.
[11] Pessarrodona A. et al., Global potential for carbon sequestration by cultivated macroalgae, Nature Sustainability, UK, vol. 6, pp 701-708, 2023, DOI: 10.1038/s41893-023-01089-6.
[12] Abdel-Raouf N. et al., Microalgae: A renewable source for wastewater treatment and feedstock supply for biofuel generation, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Egypt, vol. 169, 112877, 2023, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112877.
[13] Salam K.A. et al., Recent developments in harvesting microalgae for biodiesel production: A critical review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Bangladesh, vol. 158, 112081, 2022, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112081.
[14] Yadav G. et al., Microalgae for food and feed applications: Current status and future prospects, Bioresource Technology, India, vol. 363, 127959, 2022, DOI: 10.1016/ j.biortech.2022.127959.
[15] European Commission, Towards a strong and sustainable EU algae sector, Belgium, 2022, COM(2022) 592 final.
[16] European Parliament and Council, Directive 2008/56/EC establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive), Belgium, 2008, OJ L 164.
[17] European Parliament and Council, Directive 2014/89/EU establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning, Belgium, 2014, OJ L 257.
[18] European Commission, European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region, Belgium, 2009, COM(2009) 248 final.
[19] Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Latvia, Latvian Bioeconomy Strategy 2030, Latvia, 2017.
[20] Investment and Development Agency of Latvia (LIAA), Strategy for the "Knowledge-Intensive Bioeconomy" Area of Latvia's Smart Specialization Strategy (RIS3) 2024-2027, Latvia, 2024.
[21] Ministry of Economics of the Republic of Latvia, Latvia's National Energy and Climate Plan 2021-2030, Latvia, 2020.
[22] Ministry of Rural Affairs of Estonia, Bioeconomy Strategy 2030, Estonia, 2021.
[23] Ministry of Finance of Estonia, Maritime Spatial Plan, Estonia, 2022.
[24] Ministry of Economy and Innovation of Lithuania, Bioeconomy Development Program 2030, Lithuania, 2022.
[25] Ministry of Environment of Lithuania, General Plan of the Maritime Territory, Lithuania, 2020.
[26] Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management, Maritime Spatial Planning Document, Sweden, 2021.
[27] Ministry of the Environment of Finland, Maritime Spatial Planning Document, Finland, 2020.
[28] Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark, Marine Strategy, Denmark, 2019.
[29] Ministry of Maritime Economy and Inland Navigation of Poland, Maritime Policy, Poland, 2015.
[30] Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety of Germany, Marine Strategy, Germany, 2016.
[31] Weinberger F. et al., Farming the European Seaweed Bioeconomy, Frontiers in Marine Science, Germany, vol. 7, 722, 2020, DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00722.
[32] Friedlingstein P. et al., Global Carbon Budget 2023, Earth System Science Data, UK, vol. 15, pp 5301–5369, 2023, DOI: 10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023.
[33] Davis K.F. et al., Meeting sustainable development goals for food and land-use systems, Nature, USA, vol. 625, pp 298–304, 2024, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06638-9.
[34] Kotta J. et al., Cleaning up seas using blue growth initiatives: Mussel farming for eutrophication control in the Baltic Sea, Science of The Total Environment, Estonia, vol. 709, 136144, 2020, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136144.
[35] Lähteenmäki-Uutela A. et al., European Union legislation on macroalgae products, Aquaculture International, Finland, vol. 29, pp 487–509, 2021, DOI: 10.1007/s10499-020-00633-x.
Strengthening the Institutional Capacity of LBTU for Excellence in Studies and Research”, funded by The Recovery and Resilience Facility (ANM1) Project No. 5.2.1.1.i.0/2/24/I/CFLA/002.
conference
Proceedings of 25th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2025, Volume 25, Issue 5.1
25th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2025, Volume 25, Issue 5.1, 29 June - 6 July, 2025
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Russian Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Russian Acad Arts; Turkish Acad Sci.
277-286
29 June - 6 July, 2025
website
10474
Blue economy, sustainable development, CO2 sequestration, eutrophication mitigation, marine resource management, climate change mitigation, environmental protection, marine spatial planning


SWS Scholarly Society

International SWS Scholarly Society, Austria Read More

SGEM Extended Sessions Vienna Green

“Green Science for Green Life” 06-08 Dec 2026, Vienna, Austria Read More