Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +



Title: SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE IN LATVIA: AN ASSESSMENT OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND FARMING STRUCTURE

SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE IN LATVIA: AN ASSESSMENT OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND FARMING STRUCTURE
Aija Pilvere; Irina Pilvere; Aleksejs Nipers
10.5593/sgem2025/5.1
1314-2704
English
25
5.1
• Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA• Prof. DSc. Ildiko Tulbure, GERMANY• Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE
The European Union (EU) climate objectives rely on sustainable agriculture. This research assesses greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and key agricultural indicators in Latvia from 2020 to 2022. This research aims to assess the developmental trends of agricultural GHG emissions and farming indicators in Latvia to identify strategies or future investigations necessary to mitigate GHG emissions and enhance sustainability. In Latvia, agriculture accounted for 21-22% of total GHG emissions in carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalents from 2020 to 2023, where total GHG emissions decreased from 10,507 thousand tons in 2020 to 9,981 thousand tons in 2023, in CO2 equivalents. Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions were the most common in agriculture, accounting for 49% (1,115 kt CO2 equivalent) in 2022, followed by methane (CH4) at 47%. Despite livestock showing significant declines, dairy cows decreased by 12% from 136,035 to 119,042 between 2020 and 2023, while cattle overall decreased by only 8% from 398,989 to 368,057. The number of sheep and pigs in Latvia decreased by 15% and 5%, respectively, while the number of poultry increased by 1%. The GHG emissions from agriculture remained virtually unchanged. The amount of agricultural land area increased by 11% to 1,883,286 hectares in 2023. The increased land use for agriculture, combined with a decline in livestock numbers, resulted in a significant decrease in cattle density. This highlights the need for future evaluation of the reasons and methodology applied to Latvia's GHG emissions in the agricultural sector, to determine what other factors contributed to the unchanged GHG levels, and to identify further reduction possibilities for emissions.
[1] Anciro M. E. M., Cruz J. Z. D., Santiago, C. J. Mobile-Based Application for Agricultural Crops of Silang, Cavite. American Journal of Agricultural Science Engineering and Technology, 5(2), 2021, 240. DOI: 10.54536/ajaset.v5i2.99.
[2] Henning J. I. F., Matthews N., August M. M., Madende P. Youths’ Perceptions and Aspiration towards Participating in the Agricultural Sector: A South African Case Study. Social Sciences, 11(5), 2022, 215. DOI: 10.3390/socsci11050215.
[3] Tsoulfas G. ?., Mouzakitis, Y. Framing the transition towards sustainable agri-food supply chains. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 899(1), 2021, 12003. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/899/1/012003.
[4] Jaiswal B., Agrawal M. Carbon Footprints of Agriculture Sector. In: Muthu, S. (eds) Carbon Footprints. Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes, Springer, Singapore, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-7916-1_4.
[5] Nogrady B. How farming could become the ultimate climate-change tool. Nature, 630, 2024, 8017. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-024-02036-x.
[6] Saxena R., Vanga S. K., Wang J., Orsat V., Raghavan, V. Millets for Food Security in the Context of Climate Change: A Review. Sustainability, 10(7), 2018, 2228. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. DOI: 10.3390/su10072228.
[7] Dioha M. O., Kumar A. Exploring greenhouse gas mitigation strategies for agriculture in Africa: The case of Nigeria. AMBIO, 49(9), 2019, 1549. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-019-01293-9.
[8] Jalota S. K., Vashisht B. B., Sharma S., Kaur S. Emission of Greenhouse Gases and Their Warming Effect. In Elsevier eBooks (Chapter 1), Elsevier BV., 2018. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809520-1.00001-x.
[9] Boudalia S., Smeti S., Dawit M., Senbeta E. K., Gueroui Y., Dotas V., Bousbia A., Symeon G. Alternative Approaches to Feeding Small Ruminants and Their Potential Benefits. Animals, 14(6), 2024, 904. DOI: 10.3390/ani14060904.
[10] Snyder C. S., Bruulsema T., Jensen T., Fixen P. E. Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 133, 2009, 247. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.021.
[11] FAO. Greenhouse gas emissions from agrifood systems – Global, regional and country trends, 2000–2022. FAOSTAT Analytical Brief Series, No. 94. Rome, 2024. https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/cd3167en.
[12] European Commission. The European Green Deal. COM (2019)640 final. Brussels, 2019. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52019DC0640.
[13] CSB. GPE030. Greenhouse gas emissions 1990 – 2023. https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/en/OSP_PUB/START__ENV__GP__GPE/GPE030; GPE020. Greenhouse gas emissions in regions, State cities and municipalities 2020 – 2022. https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/en/OSP_PUB/START__ENV__GP__GPE/GPE020.
[14] CSB. LAL100.Number of livestock and poultry by region at the end of year 1990 – 2024.https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/en/OSP_PUB/START__NOZ__LA__LAL/LAL100 and LAG010. Use of agricultural area (thousand ha) 1990 – 2024. https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/en/OSP_PUB/START__NOZ__LA__LAG/LAG010/.
[15] FADN (SUDAT). Latvijas lauku saimniecibu uzskaites datu tikls, 2025. https://sudat.arei.lv/Login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2f.
[16] European Commission. Farm Accounting Data Network: An A to Z of methodology. Version 31/10/2020. https://circabc.europa.eu/ui/group/befb6055-ab0c-4305-84fe-0c80c1c0553d/library/1df3a121-11ee-40c3-a991-70a5f3cdd9d7/details.
[17] Bassignana C.F., Merante P., Belliére S.R., Vazzana C., Migliorini P. Assessment of Agricultural Biodiversity in Organic Livestock Farms in Italy. Agronomy, 12, 2022, 607. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12030607.
[18] CSB. RLA2403. Utilised agricultural area per one farm keeps growing, 2024. https://stat.gov.lv/en/statistics-themes/business-sectors/agriculture/press-releases/20949-provisional-results-integrated.
[19] Popluga D., Grinberga Zalite G. How Ready are Society for European Green Deal: Case Study from Latvia? International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM Vol. 22 (5.1), 2022, pp. 607 – 614. DOI: 10.5593/sgem2022/5.1/s21.076.
[20] Nipers A., Pilvere I., Upite I., Krievina A., Pilvere A. When pesticide reduction objectives meet business as usual: Possible impacts on the crop sector in Latvia. Resources, Environment and Sustainability, Volume 15, 2024, 100145. DOI: 10.1016/j.resenv.2023.100145.
The research was promoted with the support of the project Strengthening Institutional Capacity for Excellence in Studies and Research at LBTU (ANM1), project No. 5.2.1.1.i.0/2/24/I/CFLA/002, sub-project No. 3.2.-10/190 (AF7).
conference
Proceedings of 25th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2025, Volume 25, Issue 5.1
25th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2025, Volume 25, Issue 5.1, 29 June - 6 July, 2025
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Russian Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Russian Acad Arts; Turkish Acad Sci.
539-548
29 June - 6 July, 2025
website
10505
assessment, agriculture, animal density, sustainability, greenhouse gas emissions


SWS Scholarly Society

International SWS Scholarly Society, Austria Read More

SGEM Extended Sessions Vienna Green

“Green Science for Green Life” 06-08 Dec 2026, Vienna, Austria Read More