Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF FOREST
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF FOREST

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Nodar Khujadze; Lia Matchavariani
10.5593/sgem2024/3.1/s14.40
10.5593/sgem2024/3.1
1314-2704
978-619-7603-70-5
English
24
3.1
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Forest Ecosystems
This study aimed to investigate carbon storage dynamics in pure pine, oak, and mixed forests within a one-hectare area. Tree samples were collected to measure their weight, size, and density. Each type of forest was estimated how much carbon is hold per hectare. The findings revealed significant differences in carbon storage capacities among them. Pure oak forests emerged as the top carbon reservoirs, with 57% of their trees' mass comprising carbon. Pure pine forests followed closely with 51% carbon storage. Interestingly, mixed forests, hosting both pine and oak trees, exhibited a considerable carbon storage potential of about 53%. This finding highlights the ecological advantages of mixed forests over pure ones. Mixed forests stand out for their biodiversity, benefiting from the complementary strengths of multiple tree species. While oak trees tend to store more carbon in their dense wood, pine trees excel in capturing carbon through their rapid growth and expansive root systems. This diverse composition creates a synergistic effect, enhancing carbon capture and storage capabilities within mixed forests. The superiority of mixed forests in carbon storage has significant implications for forest management and climate change mitigation efforts. Protecting and promoting mixed forests can maximize carbon sequestration potential while fostering resilient and sustainable ecosystems. Recognizing the value of mixed forests, policymakers, conservationists, and land managers can prioritize conservation efforts and implement strategies to safeguard these invaluable carbon sinks. In summary, this research highlights the significance of forest composition in carbon storage dynamics. By emphasizing the ecological benefits of mixed forests over pure ones, our study contributes to informed decision-making and sustainable forest management practices aimed at preserving and enhancing carbon sequestration in natural landscapes.
[1] Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis – The Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Switzerland, pp 27, 2013.
[2] Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Sixteenth Session, Held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010, Framework Convention on Climate Change, Cancun, Mexico, 2010.
[3] Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Climate Change Conference, Paris, pp 33, 2015.
[4] Barrett S. Climate treaties and approaching catastrophes, J. Environ. Econ. Management 66, pp 235-250, 2013.
[5] Gibson R., Habib M.A., Ziegler A. Reinsurance securitization: the case of natural catastrophe risk, J. Math. Econ. 53, pp 79-100, 2014. [6] Arora V., Montenegro, A. Small temperature benefits provided by realistic afforestation efforts. Nature Geosci., 4, pp 514-518, 2011.
[7] Pretzsch H., Schutze G. Tree species mixing can increase stand productivity, density, and growth efficiency and attenuate the tradeoff between density and growth throughout the whole rotation. Annals of Botany, 2021.
[8] Rodriguez de Prado D., Vazquez Veloso A., Quian Y.F., Ruano I., Bravo F., Herrero de Aza C. Can mixed forests sequester more CO2 than pure forests in future climate scenarios? A case study of Pinus sylvestris combinations in Spain. Europian Journal of Forest Research, Springer. Vol. 142(1), pp 91-105, 2023
[9] Chomel M., Desrochers A., Baldy V., Guittonny M., Gauquelin T. Non-additive effects of mixing hybrid poplar and white spruce on aboveground and soil carbon storage in boreal plantations. Forest Ecology and Management, 328, pp 292-299, 2014.
[10] Giberti G.S., Wellstein C., Giovannelli A., Bielak K., Uhl E., Aguirre-Raquira W., Giammarchi F., Tonon G. Annual carbon sequestration patterns in trees: A case study from scots pine monospecific stands and mixed stands with sessile oak in central Poland. Forests, 13(4), p.582, 2022
[11] Google earth V 7,3. (December 1, 2020). Akhaltsikhe, Georgia. 41° 36’ 30.31” N, 42° 58’ 43.57” W, Eye alt 1000 feet. Maxar technologies 2024, CNES/Airbus 2024. http://www.earth.google.com [April 26, 2024] .
[12] Chave J., Sabatier U.P. Measuring wood density for tropical forest trees, 2006.
[13] Bettinger P., Boston K., Siry J., Grebner D. Forest Management and Planning: Second Edition, pp 21-63, 2017.
[14] Leverett R.T. Rejuvenated White Pine Lists and Volume Modeling. November 11, 2008.
[15] Guttler B., Bettin H., Brown R., Davis R., Mester Z., Milton M., Pramann A., Rienitz O., Vocke R., Wielgosz R. Amount of substance and the mole in the SI. Metrologia, 2019.
[16] Kleinn C., Traub B., Hoffmann C. A note on the slope correction and the estimation of the length of line features. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32(4), pp 751-756, 2002.
[17] Vachnadze G.S., Tiginashvili Z.T., Tsereteli G.V., Aptsiauri, B.N., Nishnianidze Q.G. Carbon stock sequestered from the atmosphere by coniferous forests of Eastern Georgia in conditions of global warming. Annals of Agrarian Science, 2016.
[18] Vachnadze G., Tiginashvili Z., Tsereteli G., Aptsiauri B., Basilidze L. Carbon Stock Sequestered in the phytocenosis of oak forests in Georgia. Annals of Agrarian Science, 2018.
[19] Holtmann A., Huth A., Pohl F., Rebmann C., Fischer R. Carbon sequestration in mixed deciduous forests: The influence of tree size and species composition derived from model experiments. Forests, 12(6), 726, 2021
[20] Osei R., Titeux H., Bielak K., Bravo F., Collet C., Cools C., Cornelis J.T., Heym M., Korboulewsky N., Lof M., Muys B. Tree species identity drives soil organic carbon storage more than species mixing in major two-species mixtures (pine, oak, beech) in Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 481, p.118752. 2021.
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2024/3.1/s14.40
Download PDF
Proceedings of 24th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2024
24th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2024, 1 - 07 July, 2024
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Russian Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Russian Acad Arts; Turkish Acad Sci.
339-346
1 - 07 July, 2024
website
9707
Carbon sequestration, Pure forests, Oak forests, Mixed forests

25th SGEM International Conference on Earth & Planetary Sciences


International GeoConference SGEM2025
27 June - 6 July, 2025 / Albena, Bulgaria

Read More		   

SGEM Vienna GREEN "Green Science for Green Life"


Extended Scientific Sessions SGEM Vienna GREEN
3 -6 December, 2025 / Vienna, Austria

Read More
   

A scientific platform for Art-Inspired Scientists!


The Magical World Where Science meets Art
Vienna, Austria

Read More