Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN THE FOOD INDUSTRY
BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN THE FOOD INDUSTRY

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Tatiana Guseva; Svetlana Panova; Yana Molchanova; Olga Sergienko; Chirag Bhimani
10.5593/sgem2024/5.1/s20.04
10.5593/sgem2024/5.1
1314-2704
978-619-7603-72-9
English
24
5.1
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Ecology and Environmental Protection
The article considers challenges and opportunities of Best Available Techniques (BAT) in the food industry, analysing cases of intensive poultry rearing and milk production. Authors emphasise that the food industry is one of the primary sectors of the world economy. According to The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, by 2050, a 70% increase in world production will be required to meet the needs of the planets expected 10 billion population. The authors discuss the potential for further development of the sector applying BAT principles, including approaches to reduce energy, water consumption, and enhancing the environmental performance of food production processes. The article compares BAT-associated resource consumption and emission levels in the European Union (EU), Russia and India. The article emphases that there is a room for significant improvement of energy and water management practices in the sectors, both in Russia and India. Techniques to be considered for the practical implementation are described in the European vertical (sectoral) and horizontal Reference Documents on BAT (BREF) as well as in the new Russian BREF on Energy Efficiency. Authors note that wastewater from milk industries and even poultry farms is often treated by Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants (MWWTP), and recommend application of both techniques and BAT-associated emission levels stated in the Russian Reference Document on BAT for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants in the developing countries.
[1] Global agriculture towards 2050. High-Level Expert Forum, 2009. URL: https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/wsfs/docs/Issues_papers/HLEF2050_Global_Agriculture.pdf (retrieved 24.04.2024).
[2] Best Available Techniques (BAT) for Preventing and Controlling Industrial Pollution, Activity 4: Guidance Document on Determining BAT, BAT-Associated Environmental Performance Levels and BAT-Based Permit Conditions, Environment, Health and Safety, Environment Directorate, OECD, 2020. URL: https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/risk-management/guidance-document-on-determining-best-available-techniques.pdf (retrieved 24.04.2024).
[3] Skobelev D., Environmental Industrial Policy in Russia: Economic, Resource Efficiency and Environmental Aspects, Proceedings of the 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2019, Bulgaria, 2019, vol. 19, is. 5.3, pp. 291-298. DOI: 10.5593/sgem2019/5.3/S21.037.
[4] Nemenushchaya L., Konovalenko L., Shchegolikhina T., Production and Use of Basic Technological Facilities for BAT in the Food and Processing Industries of Agribusiness, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 403 012104, 2019. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/403/1/012104.
[5] Dairy and Dairy Products. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2022-2031, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2021. DOI: 10.1787/191239cc-en.
[6] Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control. Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Food, Drink and Milk Industries, European Commission, 2006. URL: https://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2020-03/superseded_fdm_bref_0806.pdf (retrieved 24.04.2024).
[7] JRC Science for Policy Report. Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Food, Drink and Milk Industries. European Commission, 2019, URL: https://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2020-01/JRC118627_FDM_Bref_2019_published.pdf (retrieved 24.04.2024).
[8] Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Municipal Wastewater Treatment, ITS 10-2019. Translation of the Official Rosstandart Edition, Russia, 2019.
[9] Thakur A., Kumar A., Vanita B. et al., Water Footprint – A Tool for Sustainable Development of Indian Dairy Industry, International Journal of Livestock Research, 2019, vol. 8 (10), pp. 1-18. DOI: 10.5455/ijlr.20180110101311.
[10] JRC Science for Policy Report. Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Intensive Rearing of Poultry or Pigs. European Commission, 2017. URL: https://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2019-11/JRC107189_IRPP_Bref_2017_published.pdf (retrieved 24.04.2024).
[11] Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Intensive Rearing of Poultry or Pigs, ITS 42-2023, Rosstandart, Russia, 2023 (in Russian). URL: https://burondt.ru/NDT/NDTDocsDetail.php?UrlId=2096&etkstructure_id=1872 (retrieved 24.04.2024).
[12] Ni J. Q., Liu S., Diehl C. A. et al., Emission Factors and Characteristics of Ammonia, Hydrogen Sulfide, Carbon Dioxide, and Particulate Matter at Two High-Rise Layer Hen Houses, Atmospheric Environment, 2017, vol. 154, pp. 260-273.
[13] Ladha-Sabur A., Bakalis S., Fryer P. J. et al., Mapping Energy Consumption in Food Manufacturing. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2019, vol. 86, pp. 270-280. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.034.
[14] Gosalvitr P., Cuellar-Franca R., Smith R., Azapagic A., Energy Demand and Carbon Footprint of Cheddar Cheese with Energy Recovery from Cheese Whey, Energy Procedia, 2019, vol. 161, pp. 10-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.052.
[15] Bist R. B., Subedi S., Chai L., Yang X., Ammonia Emissions, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies for Poultry Production: A Critical Review, published by Elsevier, Manuscript_b68899136ef150209c8e170eb7528c3f. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479722024926 (retrieved 24.04.2024).
[16] Environmental Guidelines for Poultry Farms, Central Pollution Control Board (Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India), Dehli. 2022. URL: https://cpcb.nic.in/openpdffile.php?id=TGF0ZXN0RmlsZS8zNDFfMTY0MTgwNzg1Nl9tZWRpYXBob3RvMjg2MjgucGRm (retrieved 24.04.2024).
[17] Tikhonova I., Guseva T., Panova S., Interrelatedness of Best Available Techniques and Best Environmental Practices: A Municipal Wastewater Treatment Case, Proceedings of 22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022, Bulgaria, 2022, is. 5.1, pp. 257-265. DOI: 10.5593/sgem2022/5.1/s20.033.
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2024/5.1/s20.04
Download PDF
Proceedings of 24th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2024
24th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2024, 1 - 7 July, 2024
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Russian Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Russian Acad Arts; Turkish Acad Sci.
25-32
1 - 7 July, 2024
website
9954
Best Available Techniques, food industry, dairy industry, poultry rearing, resource efficiency, environmental performance

25th SGEM International Conference on Earth & Planetary Sciences


International GeoConference SGEM2025
27 June - 6 July, 2025 / Albena, Bulgaria

Read More		   

SGEM Vienna GREEN "Green Science for Green Life"


Extended Scientific Sessions SGEM Vienna GREEN
3 -6 December, 2025 / Vienna, Austria

Read More
   

A scientific platform for Art-Inspired Scientists!


The Magical World Where Science meets Art
Vienna, Austria

Read More