Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: WORKFLOW BETWEEN TERRESTRIAL LASER SCAN AND UAV PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES
WORKFLOW BETWEEN TERRESTRIAL LASER SCAN AND UAV PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Ovidiu Stefan Cuzic; Eugen Teodor Man; Adrian Alionescu; Ioan Sorin Herban
10.5593/sgem2022/2.1/s09.32
10.5593/sgem2022/2.1
1314-2704
978-619-7603-40-8
English
22
2.1
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Geodesy and Mine Surveying
The structural analysis of the civil infrastructure is vital in order to track the evolution of degradation in time, to prevent disasters, but also to document and conserve the sites of cultural heritage. This paper review’s the workflow on the acquisition of point clouds to Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS) with those collected by photogrammetric 3D models based on images captured by an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), analyzing the data sets on two diferent type of bridges located in western Romania. The obtained data can serve a wide range of applications and supports different studies, also providing new digital tools that help tracking the degradation in time, reducing the technical limitations in the cultural heritage preservation, and exploring alternative ways for shaping future steps associated with saftey inspection. Depending on the objective, the use of such integrated technologies brings a significant contribution as a support tool for decision making. Due to the geometric complexity of the structure, the accuracy of measurements was limited by the resolution of sensors (remote-sensing data) and areas without light, hard to reach by lens. The comparative analysis of the two techniques shows that both methods produced similar results with high precision but also presented disadvantages in terms of data associated with spatial features.
[1] Mohammadi, Masoud & Rashidi, Maria & Mousavi, Vahid & Karami, Ali & Yu, Yang & Samali, Bijan. (2021). Quality Evaluation of Digital Twins Generated Based on UAV Photogrammetry and TLS: Bridge Case Study. Remote Sensing. 13. 3499. 10.3390/rs13173499.
[2] Rashidi, Maria & Hoshyar, Azadeh & Smith, Liam & Samali, Bijan & Siddique, Rafat. (2020). A comprehensive taxonomy for structure and material deficiencies, preventions and remedies of timber bridges. Journal of Building Engineering. 34. 101624. 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101624.
[3] Joe Opoku, S. Perera, R. Osei-Kyei, M. Rashidi, Digital twin application in the construction industry: A literature review, Journal of Building Engineering
[4] Szeliski, R. Computer Vision: Algorithms and Applications; Springer: London, UK, 2011.
[5] Lichti, D. (2004). A resolution measure for terrestrial laser scanners. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. 34, Part 3.
[6] Huang, Hui & Li, D. & Ascher, U. & Zhang, H. & Cohen-Or, D. (2009). Consolidation of Unorganized Point Clouds for Surface Reconstruction. ACM Transactions on Graphics. 28. 1-7. 10.1145/1618452.1618522.
[7] Salgado, C.M.; Azevedo, C.; Proenca, H.; Vieira, S.M. Noise Versus Outliers. In Secondary Analysis of Electronic Health Records; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 163–183.
[8] Uchida, T.; Hasegawa, K.; Li, L.; Adachi, M.; Yamaguchi, H.; Thufail, F.I.; Riyanto, S.; Okamoto, A.; Tanaka, S. Noise-robust transparent visualization of largescale point clouds acquired by laser scanning. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2020, 161, 124–134.
[9] Wang, Y. Outlier Formation and Removal in 3D Laser Scanned Point Clouds. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2014.]
[10] Ullman, S. 1979. “The interpretation of structure from motion.” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 203 (1153): 405–426. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0006.
[11] Berger, M., A. Tagliasacchi, L. M. Seversky, P. Alliez, J. A. Levine, A. Sharf, and C. T. Silva. 2014. “State of the art in surface reconstruction from point clouds.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., Eurographics 2014–State of the Art Reports, edited by S. Lefebvre and M. Spagnuolo, 161–185. Geneva, Switzerland: Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/egst.20141040.
[12] Sargent, I., J. Harding, and M. Freeman. 2007. “Data quality in 3D: Gauging quality measures from users’ requirements.” In Proc., 5th Int. Symp. Spatial Data Quality 2007: Modelling Qualities in Space and Time, edited by A. Stein, 8. Newcastle, UK: ISPRS
[13] Koutsoudis, A., B. Vidmar, G. Ioannakis, F. Arnaoutoglou, G. Pavlidis, and C. Chamzas. 2014. “Multi-image 3D reconstruction data evaluation.” J. Cult. Heritage 15 (1): 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2012.12.003.
[14] Cheng, S.-W., and M.-K. Lau. 2017. “Denoising a point cloud for surface reconstruction.” Preprint submitted April 13, 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs /1704.04038.
[15] Siyuan Chen; Debra F. Laefer, M.ASCE; Eleni Mangina; S. M. Iman Zolanvari; and Jonathan Byrne; UAV Bridge Inspection through Evaluated 3D Reconstructions
[16] Verein Deutscher Ingenieure; Verband Der Elektrotechnik. VDI/VDE 2634 BLATT 3, Optical 3D-Measuring Systems—Multiple View Systems Based on Area Scanning; Engl. VDI/VDE-Gesellschaft Mess- und Automatisierungstechnik: Dusseldorf, Germany, 2008.
[17] Wolff, K., C., Kim, H., Zimmer, C., Schroers, M. Botsch, and O. SorkineHornung, and A. Sorkine-Hornung. 2016. “Point cloud noise and outlier removal for image-based 3D reconstruction.” In Proc., 2016 4th Int. Conf. on 3D Vision Point, 118– 27. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
[18] Dorafshan, S.; Maguire, M. Bridge inspection: Human performance, unmanned aerial systems and automation. J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 2018, 8, 443–476. [CrossRef]
[19] Rashidi, M.; Mohammadi, M.; Sadeghlou Kivi, S.; Abdolvand, M.M.; TruongHong, L.; Samali, B. A Decade of Modern Bridge Monitoring Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning: Review and Future Directions. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3796. [CrossRef].
[20] Mohammadi, M.; Rashidi, M.; Mousavi, V.; Karami, A.; Yu, Y.; Samali, B. Quality Evaluation of Digital Twins Generated Based on UAV Photogrammetry and TLS: Bridge Case Study. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3499. https://doi.org/10.3390/ rs13173499
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022/2.1/s09.32
Download PDF
Proceedings of 22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022
22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022, 04 - 10 July, 2022
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
273-284
04 - 10 July, 2022
website
8500
Point Cloud, Terrestrial Scanning, UAV photogrammetry, Bridge, Digital modelling