Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: SCREENING OF THE ABILITY OF RHIZOSPHERE BACTERIA TO PRODUCE BIOSURFACTANTS
SCREENING OF THE ABILITY OF RHIZOSPHERE BACTERIA TO PRODUCE BIOSURFACTANTS

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
A. Gordeev; A. Kamalova; S. Selivanovskaya
10.5593/sgem2022/5.1/s20.049
10.5593/sgem2022/5.1
1314-2704
978-619-7603-46-0
English
22
5.1
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Ecology and Environmental Protection
Surfactants produced by microorganisms, known as biosurfactants, have recently found wide application in the industry, from cosmetology to oil processing. Biosurfactants are more tolerant to extreme environmental conditions and less hazardous for the environment as compared with their chemical analogues. Despite on the fact that many biosurfactant producers have been recently isolated and described, the challenge to explore new producers still remains very urgent. In the present study, the isolates obtained from rhizosphere soil were screened towards their abilities to emulsify oil and to decrease interface tension between oil and water. As a source of potential producers, rhizosphere soil of Latuca sativa was used. 12 rapidly growing isolates were cultivated in glycerol nitrate medium at 28? for 72 h. Emulsification activity (E24) and drop collapse tests were used to screen the abilities of the supernatants obtained. The lowest E24 was registered for 7 of 12 isolates (from 0% to 43%), while the highest one was registered for 5 from 12 isolates (50%). All these 5 isolates (12b, 19a, 20b, 23a and 26b) demonstrated high efficiency in drop collapse test as well (maximal scores in qualitative test). Besides, 3 other isolates were characterized as the most efficient in the drop collapse test (2c, 9a and 17a).
[1] Le Guenic S., Chaveriat L., Lequart V., Joly N., Martin P., Renewable Surfactants for Biochemical Applications and Nanotechnology, Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 5–21, 2019.
[2] Asaka O., Shoda M., Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Damping-Off of Tomato with Bacillus subtilis RB14, Applied and Environmental Microbiology Journal, vol. 62, pp. 4081–4085, 1996.
[3] Campos-Takaki G. M., Sarubbo L. A., Albuquerque C. D. C., Environmentally friendly biosurfactants produced by yeasts, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 672, pp. 250–260, 2010.
[4] Singh B. P., Cowie A. L., Long-term influence of biochar on native organic carbon mineralisation in a low-carbon clayey soil, Scientific Reports, vol. 4, p. 3687, 2015.
[5] Mulligan C. N., Yong R. N., Gibbs B. F., Surfactant-enhanced remediation of contaminated soil: a review, Engineering Geology, vol. 60, pp. 371–380, 2001.
[6] Scott M. J., Jones M. N., The biodegradation of surfactants in the environment, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Biomembranes, vol. 1508 , pp. 235–251, 2000.
[7] Tackie-Otoo B. N., Ayoub Mohammed M. A., Yekeen N., Negash B. M., Alternative chemical agents for alkalis, surfactants and polymers for enhanced oil recovery: Research trend and prospects, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 187, p. 106828, 2020.
[8] Adu S. A., Naughton P. J., Marchant R., Banat I. M., Microbial Biosurfactants in Cosmetic and Personal Skincare Pharmaceutical Formulations, Pharmaceutical Journal, vol. 12, p. 1099, 2020.
[9] Gudina E. J., Rangarajan V., Sen R., Rodrigues L. R., Potential therapeutic applications of biosurfactants, Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 34, pp. 667– 675, 2013.
[10] Bodour A. A., Drees K. P., Maier R. M., Distribution of biosurfactant-producing bacteria in undisturbed and contaminated arid southwestern soils, Applied and Environmental Microbiology Journal, vol. 69, pp. 3280–3287, 2003.
[11] Jain D. K., Collins-Thompson D. L., Lee H., Trevors J. T., A drop-collapsing test for screening surfactant-producing microorganisms, Journal of Microbiological Methods, vol. 13, pp. 271–279, 1991.
[12] Youssef N. H., Duncan K. E., Nagle D. P., Savage K. N., Knapp R. M., McInerney M. J., Comparison of methods to detect biosurfactant production by diverse microorganisms, Journal of Microbiological Methods, vol. 56, pp. 339–347, 2004.
[13] Varjani S., Upasani V. N., Evaluation of rhamnolipid production by a halotolerant novel strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bioresource Technology, vol. 288, p. 121577, 2019.
[14] Shah M. U. H., Sivapragasam M., Moniruzzaman M., Yusup S. B., A comparison of Recovery Methods of Rhamnolipids Produced by Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Procedia Engineering., vol. 148, pp. 494–500, 2016.
This work was funded by the subsidy allocated to Kazan Federal University for the state assignment in the sphere of scientific activities, project № 0671-2020-0055.
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022/5.1/s20.049
Download PDF
Proceedings of 22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022
22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022, 04 - 10 July, 2022
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
387-392
04 - 10 July, 2022
website
8713
biosurfactant, screening, drop collapse, Emulsification index (E24), rhizosphere