Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ MISCONCEPTIONS ON PRINCIPLES OF GEOLOGY
CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ MISCONCEPTIONS ON PRINCIPLES OF GEOLOGY

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Georgios Giotopoulos; Irini Skopeliti; Ioannis Koukouvelas; Polychronis Economou; Eleni Gianni; Dimitrios Papoulis
10.5593/sgem2022/5.1/s22.092
10.5593/sgem2022/5.1
1314-2704
978-619-7603-46-0
English
22
5.1
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Education and Accreditation
Previous studies have shown that secondary school students may have misconceptions about geological scientific information. By the end of secondary education these misconceptions may remain unresolved. As a result, students enter university studies and still hold them. Students of engineering, as for example civil engineering, are no exception. The aim of this study was to investigate and analyse misconceptions of this specific target group. A closed questionnaire was designed and given to 102 University students who attended the 2nd semester course “Geology for Civil Engineers” in the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Patras. The questionnaire was designed and validated according to previous research findings and implemented through google forms that were prepared and given electronically to the students to fill them online. The participants completed the questionnaire on the principles of geology electronically due to Covid-19 conditions. The results showed that in some questions most of the students answered correctly while in others there were many wrong answers, which revealed their misconceptions in geology. Many misconceptions were traced especially regarding mineral properties like color and luster. An important observation was that a notable number of students confused hardness with brittleness and as a result they expressed their belief that hard minerals are hard to break. Gender and age differences were tested using appropriate statistical tests. In cases that there was a significant difference between the genders, women were the ones with higher percentage of correct answers. The results may be seen in relation to educational practices.
[1] Francek, M., A Compilation and Review of over 500 Geoscience Misconceptions, International Journal of Science Education, England & Wales, vol. 35/issue 1, pp 31-64, 2013.
[2] Plenge, M.F., Hutson, B. L. & Graniero L.E., The BeAMS project: Using inquiry and modeling to introduce students to the research process in an introductory geology laboratory, Journal of Geoscience Education, USA, 2021.
[3] Vosniadou, S. Vamvakoussi, X., & Skopeliti, I., The Framework Theory Approach to the Problem of Conceptual Change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.) International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, New York: Routledge, 2008, pp 3-34
[4] Kusnick, J., Growing pebbles and conceptual prisms – understanding the source of student misconceptions about rock formation. Journal of Geoscience Educationvol.50/issue 1, pp 31-39, USA, 2002.
[5] Ford, D., The challenges of observing geologically: Third graders’ descriptions of rock and mineral properties, Science Education, USA, vol. 89/issue 2, pp 276–295, 2005.
[6] Kali, Y., Orion, N., & Eylon, B., The effect of knowledge integration activities on students’ perceptions of the earth’s crust as a cyclic system. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, USA, vol. 40/issue 6, pp 545–565, 2003.
[7] King, C., Geoscience education: an overview, Studies in Science Education, England & Wales, vol. 44/issue 2, pp187-222, 2008.
[8] Ibanez, M. M. I., Del Carmen Romero Lopez, M., & Del Pilar Jimenez Tejada, M., Which type of science is presented in secondary education textbooks? [?que ciencia se presenta en los libros de texto de Educacion Secundaria?] Ensenanza De Las Ciencias, Spain, vol. 37/issue 3, pp 49-71, 2019.
[9] Guffey S.K., Slater T.F., Geology misconceptions targeted by an overlapping consensus of US national standards and frameworks, International Journal of Science Education, England & Wales, vol. 42/issue 3, pp. 469-492, 2020.
[10] Agresti, A. Categorical Data Analysis, Second Edition. Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, USA, 2002.
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022/5.1/s22.092
Download PDF
Proceedings of 22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022
22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022, 04 - 10 July, 2022
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
735-742
04 - 10 July, 2022
website
8756
misconceptions, minerals, rocks, conceptions, minerals’ traits

24th SGEM International Conference on Earth & Planetary Sciences


International GeoConference SGEM2024
28 June - 8 July, 2024 / Albena, Bulgaria

Read More		   

SGEM Vienna GREEN "Green Science for Green Life"


Extended Scientific Sessions SGEM Vienna GREEN
25 - 29 November, 2024 / Vienna, Austria

Read More
   

A scientific platform for Art-Inspired Scientists!


The Magical World Where Science meets Art
Vienna, Austria

Read More