Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: THE MAPPING OF CLIMATE AND AGRICULTURAL POLICIES TARGETING ORGANIC SOIL MANAGEMENT: CASE STUDY FROM LATVIA
THE MAPPING OF CLIMATE AND AGRICULTURAL POLICIES TARGETING ORGANIC SOIL MANAGEMENT: CASE STUDY FROM LATVIA

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Ieva Licite; Dina Popluga
10.5593/sgem2022/5.1/s23.099
10.5593/sgem2022/5.1
1314-2704
978-619-7603-46-0
English
22
5.1
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Environmental Legislation, Multilateral Relations and Funding Opportunities
Organic soil management and related climate and agriculture policy planning is emerging issue globally, at European Union (EU) level and nationally, especially for organic soil rich countries like Latvia and in a light of movement towards climate neutrality by 2050. Relatively small proportion of these soils by area significantly impact greenhouse gas (GHG) emission balance of many European countries including Latvia where organic soil management related GHG emissions make up to one third of GHG emissions associated with agriculture land management. Organic soil can act either as an effective carbon storage or as considerable source of greenhouse gas emissions. The effect achieved largely depends on the management practices applied and considering importance of agriculture support system - also on agriculture and climate policy planning. In this study we analyze top-down policy and legislative framework of organic soil management in Latvia to detect development pattern of the political importance of organic soil and to map normative and policy framework around this issue. We found that international policies, i.e. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and related European level agriculture and Climate policies i.e. European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and Climate policy are drivers of organic soil management at national level. Study results show genesis of the organic soil issue, map political time frame and suggest further development needs.
[1] Smith P., Bustamante M., Ahammad H., Clark H., Dong E.A., Elsiddig H., Haberl R., Harper J., House M., Jafari O., Masera C., Mbow N., Ravindranath H., Rice C.W., Robledo Abad C., Romanovskaya A., Sperling F., Tubiello F., 2014: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
[2] Barthelmes A., Couwenberg J., Risager M., Tegetmeyer C., Joosten H., Peatlands and Climate in a Ramsar Context: A Nordic-Baltic Perspective, TemaNord 2015:544, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, 2015, pp 1–244;
[3] LEGMC, 2020: Latvia’s National Inventory under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Kyoto Protocol and Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 for 1990?2020.
[4] Kunreuther H.S., Gupta V., Bosetti R., Cooke V., Dutt M., Ha-Duong H., Held J., Llanes-Regueiro A., Patt E., Weber E., 2014: Integrated Risk and Uncertainty Assessment of Climate Change Response Policies. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
[5] Mair D., Smillie L., La Placa G., Schwendinger F., Raykovska M., Pasztor Z., van Bavel R., Understanding our political nature: How to put knowledge and reason at the heart of political decision-making, EUR 29783 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2019.
[6] Buschmann C., Roder N., Berglund K., Berglund O., L?rke P.E., Maddison M., Manderd U., Myllys M., Osterburg B., van den Akker J.J.H., Perspectives on agriculturally used drained peat soils: Comparison of the socioeconomic and ecological business environments of six European regions, Land Use Policy, vol. 90, article 104181, 2020.
[7] Tiemeyer B., Freibauer A., Borrazb E.A., Augustin J., Bechtold M., Beetz S., Beyer C., Ebli M., Eickenscheidt T., Fiedler S., Forster C., Gensior A., Giebels M., Glatzel S., Heinichen J., Hoffmann M., Hoper H., Jurasinski G., Laggnera A., Leiber-Sauheitl K., Peichl-Brak M., Drosler M., A new methodology for organic soils in national greenhouse gas inventories: Data synthesis, derivation and application, Ecological Indicators, vol.109, article 105838, 2020.
[8] Heikkinen J., Keskinen R., Regina K., Honkanen H., Nuutinen V., Estimation of carbon stocks in boreal cropland soils – methodological considerations, European Journal of Soil Science, vol.72, Issue 2, pp. 934-945, 2021.
[9] Heuser I., Soil Governance in current European Union Law and in the European Green Deal, Soil Security, vol. 6, article 100053, March 2022.
Research is done in the framework of project “LLU transition to the new doctoral funding model” (No 8.2.2.0/20/I/001) and European Union LIFE Programme project “Demonstration of climate change mitigation potential of nutrient rich organic soils in Baltic States and Finland” (LIFE OrgBalt, LIFE18 CCM/LV/001158)”.
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022/5.1/s23.099
Download PDF
Proceedings of 22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022
22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022, 04 - 10 July, 2022
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
793-800
04 - 10 July, 2022
website
8763
agriculture, organic soil, climate policy, CAP, Latvia