Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: THE MODEL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE GOVERNANCE IN LATVIA
THE MODEL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE GOVERNANCE IN LATVIA

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Zanda Krukle
10.5593/sgem2022/5.1/s23.100
10.5593/sgem2022/5.1
1314-2704
978-619-7603-46-0
English
22
5.1
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Environmental Legislation, Multilateral Relations and Funding Opportunities
Environmental noise can cause a negative impact on human health physiologically and psychologically, interfering with sleep, rest, concentration, communication and other activities. The article study of possible solutions on how to prevent and reduce environmental noise through governance practices in Latvia, developing strategic, practice-based model for environmental noise governance, which has not been done prior to this study. This research is based on several objectives, including a comprehensive analysis of governance policies and established practices in Europe and Latvia in the field of legislation, institutional systems, society feedback governance, and practical government approaches. Empirical and statistical data analysis, documentation analysis, sociological research, and case study methods have been used for this purpose, including the analysis of both acoustic and non-acoustic aspects. The results showed that environmental noise governance issues in Latvia are mainly related to the high subjective noise perception, a poor understanding of environmental noise, low prioritization and ineffective implementation and monitoring of the existing noise governance policies. Taking into account the mentioned factors, an integrated comprehensive and multi-level practice based environmental noise governacne model (that consist of national, municipal and coordination sub-models) has been proposed and described.
[1] 13. European Environmental agency. Reported data on noise exposure covered by Directive 2002/49/EC, 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-andmaps/data/data-on-noise-exposure-6
[2] Kephalopoulos, S., Paviotti M. Common noise assessment methods for Europe (CNOSSOS-EU): Implementation challenges in the context of EU noise policy developments and future perspectives, 23rd International Congress on Noise and Vibration, Greece, vol 1. pp 1-14, 2016.
[3] Suau-Sanchez, P., Pallares-Barbera, M., Paul, V. Incorporating annoyance in airport environmental policy: noise, societal response and community participation, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 19, pp 275–284, 2011.
[4] Guski, R. 1999. Personal and social variables as co-determinants of noise annoyance. Noise Health.1, 45-56.
[5] Job, R.F. Noise sensitivity as a factor influencing human reaction to noise, Noise Health, vol. 1/ issue 3, pp 57-68, 1999.
[6] Weber, M., Driessen, P., Runhaar, H. Drivers of and Barriers to Shifts in Governance: Analysing Noise Policy in the Netherlands, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, vol. 13/ issue 2, pp 119-137, 2011.
[7] Schwela, D., Fineglod, L., Stewart, J. A strategic approach on environmental noise management in developing countries, 9th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN), USA, 8 p., 2008.
[8] Schwela, D., Finegold, L. & Stuart, J. A strategic approach on environmental noise management in developing countries, 9th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem (ICBEN) 2008, London. pp 780-787, 2011
[9] Finegold, L., Schwela, D., Lambert, J. (2012). Progress on noise policies from 2008 to 2011, Noise Health, 4(61), 307-312.
[10] Belojevic, G., Kim, R., Kephalopoulos, S. Assessment of needs for capacitybuilding for health risk assessment of environmental noise: case studies, Copenhagen, World Health Organization, 2012.
[11] Jeram, S., Lekaviciute, J., Krukle, Z., Argalasova-Sobotova, L., Ristovska, G., Paunovic, K., Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska, M. Community response to noise: research in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe and Newly Independent States, Noise Health, vo.15/ issue 62, 12 – 21, 2013.
[12] Licitra, G., Ascari, E. Gden: An indicator for European noise maps comparison and to support action plans, Science of the Total Environment, vol. 482-483, pp 411–419, 2014.
[13] Moudon, A. V. Real Noise from the Urban Environment: How Ambient Community Noise Affects Health and What Can Be Done About It, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 37/ issue 2, pp 167 – 171, 2009.
[14] Basner, M., Brink, M., Bristow, A., de Kluizenaar, Y., Finegold, L., Hong, J., Janssen, S.A., Klaeboe, R., Leroux, T., Liebl, A., Matsui, T., Schwela, D., SliwinskaKowalska, M., Sorqvist, P. ICBEN review of research on the biological effects of noise 2011-2014, NoiseHealth, vol. 17 / issue 75, pp 57-82, 2011.
[15] Baranovskii, A., Krukle, Z. Railway noise abatement on Latvian railway, Proceedings of the international conference 22nd International Congress of Sound and Vibration. Conference Proceedings, Italy, 2015.
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022/5.1/s23.100
Download PDF
Proceedings of 22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022
22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022, 04 - 10 July, 2022
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
801-808
04 - 10 July, 2022
website
8764
Environmental noise, Europe, governance, model