Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FROM GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE: TRANSREGIONAL EUROPEAN UNION ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY AND “GREEN DEAL DIPLOMACY”
SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FROM GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE: TRANSREGIONAL EUROPEAN UNION ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY AND “GREEN DEAL DIPLOMACY”

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Jozef Cernak; Denisa Ciderova; Giorgi Benashvili
10.5593/sgem2022V/3.2/s12.24
10.5593/sgem2022V/3.2
1314-2704
978-619-7603-54-5
English
22
3.2
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Hydrology and Water Resources
When considering the (sub)region of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and its position in the global economy in relative terms represented by trade openness, the European Union (EU) members from the CEE (sub)region tend to match or even exceed the EU average and EU membership underlines their potential. Recently, environmental concerns have become prominent in international trade and in the framework of its external relations the EU seeks to boost its ambition of a global player. Our paper is oriented on the economic diplomacy and environmental diplomacy theme – in terms of EU competences represented by “commercial diplomacy”, “trade diplomacy” and the “Green Deal diplomacy”. To promote more sustainable developments, the EU’s European Green Deal (2019) emphasises the Comprehensive Strategy of the EU with Africa and this is why the aim of our paper was to assess the EU’s interests in transregional sense by applying the Pareto-optimal scenario/the Nash equilibrium to the qualitative hypothesis formulated: “Geostrategic interests of China and of the postBrexit EU in the process of shaping a new EU strategy towards Africa are partly of a rival and partly of a complementary nature”. When documenting quantitative & qualitative sustainable development trends in the context of international spillovers and relevance of both transregional complementarity & rivalry between the EU and PRC/China, our paper addressed the United Nations 2030 Agenda as well as the African Union Agenda 2063.
[1] Bachmann, V., (Trans)regionalism and South-South cooperation: Afrasia instead of Eurafrique?, Third World Quarterly. vol. 40/issue 4, pp 688-709, 2019.
[2] Brockova, I., Modern Economic Diplomacy of Small States, Politicke vedy/Political Sciences, Slovak Republic, vol. XXII/issue 2, pp 12-25, 2019.
[3] Cohn, Th., International political economy (IPE), Encyclopedia of international relations and global politics, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and USA, 2005, pp 441-451.
[4] European Commission, European Economic Forecast Autumn 2021, Luxembourg, 2021.
[5] Hosoff, B. et al., Vyvoj a perspektivy svetovej ekonomiky: Priciny a dosledky rastucich cien, Slovak Republic, 2022.
[6] Krpec, O., Hodulak, V., Politicka ekonomie mezinarodnich vztahu, Czechia, 2011.
[7] Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., Bermont Diaz, L., Kloke-Lesch, A., Koundouri, P., Riccaboni, A., Achieving the SDGs: Europe’s Compass in a Multipolar World. Europe Sustainable Development Report 2022, SDSN and SDSN Europe, France, 2022.
[8] Managi, S., Hibiki, A., Tetsumi, T., Does trade openness improve environmental quality?, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 58, pp 346-363, 2009.
[9] Michel, S., Beuret, M., La Chinafrique, France, 2010.
[10] Official website of the European Union (https://europeanunion.europa.eu/index_en) and of its European External Action Service (https://www.eeas.europa.eu/_en), Belgium.
[11] Okano-Heijmans, M., Economic Diplomacy, The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and USA, 2016, pp 552-563.
[12] Ribeiro Hoffmann, A. R., Inter- and Transregionalism, The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, 2016, pp 600-618.
[13] Sachs, J., Lafortune, G., Kroll, Ch., Fuller, G., Woelm, F., From Crisis to Sustainable Development: the SDGs as Roadmap to 2030 and Beyond. Sustainable Development Report 2022, Bertelsmann Stiftung, SDSN, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and USA, 2022.
[14] Woolcock, S., Theoretical Analysis of Economic Diplomacy, The New Economic Diplomacy: Decision-Making and Negotiation in International Economic Relations, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, 2007, pp 21-42.
[15] World Bank, International Comparison Program, USA, 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/icp
The authors would like to thank the research projects: “Nova vizia ekonomickej diplomacie SR ako nastroja proexportnej politiky do roku 2023 / New vision of economic diplomacy of the Slovak Republic as a tool of export promotion until 2023” funded by the Foundation of the Ministry of Economy of the Slovak Republic (July 2021 – July 2022); VEGA project No. 1/0777/20; KEGA project No. 003EU-4-2022, and the National Scholarship Programme of the Slovak Republic for providing financial support.
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022V/3.2/s12.24
Download PDF
Proceedings of 22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022
22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022, 06-08 December, 2022
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
205-214
06-08 December, 2022
website
8788
United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs); African Union Agenda 2063; European (Union) Green Deal diplomacy; Belt and Road Initiative (BRI); economic diplomacy