Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: CHARACTERIZATION OF LANDFILL GAS COMPOSITION FOR THE PRODUCTION OF BIOMETHANE
CHARACTERIZATION OF LANDFILL GAS COMPOSITION FOR THE PRODUCTION OF BIOMETHANE

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Monica Calero; Maria Angeles Martin-Lara; Gabriel Blazquez; Sunil Arjandas; Antonio Perez
10.5593/sgem2022V/4.2/s18.07
10.5593/sgem2022V/4.2
1314-2704
978-619-7603-50-7
English
22
4.2
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Recycling
Biomethane and other renewable gases will enable to thrive on a fully renewable energy system. Biomethane has similar qualities to natural gas, so it can be injected into existing natural gas infrastructure or used as a biofuel for transport. Also, its use means a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and dependence on fossil fuels.
This work is part of the LIFE LANDFILL BIOFUEL project that aims to implement a cost-effective system based on new techniques to improve the recovery of landfill biogas and the production of biomethane with quality for vehicular use. In a first stage a complete characterization of the biogas produced has been carried out.
Biogas is produced at the municipal solid waste treatment plant Ecocentral, located in Alhendin, Granada (Spain). The composition of the biogas as well as its main physical and chemical parameters has been determined.
Differences in the composition of the biogas with the sampling point were found. Biogas consists mainly of methane with a content varying between 50% and 63% and carbon dioxide with a content of approximately 40%. The rest of the components are mainly O2 with content below 2% and N2 content between values below 15% and values arround 7%. The total siloxane content has been less than 3.0 mg/Nm3.
The knowledge of the composition of this biogas has been decisive for the development of the upgrading procedure for its conversion to biomethane.
[1] European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The European Green Deal. Brussels, 11.12.2019, COM (2019) 640 final.
[2] European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. ‘Fit for 55’: delivering the EU’s 2030 Climate Target on the way to climate neutrality. Brussels, 14.7.2021, COM (2021) 550 final.
[3] MITECO. National Integrated Energy and Climate Plan 2021-2030, 2021, pp 427.
[4] MITECO. Biogas roadmap, Published in the Strategic Framework for Energy and Climate, within the Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan, 2022, pp 72.
[5] Varnero, M.T., Manual de biogas. Editado por: Proyecto CHI/00/G32 “Chile: remocion de barreras para la electrificacion rural con energias renovables”. ISBN 978- 95-306892-0, 2011, pp 119.
[6] Iglesias, R., Munoz, R., Polanco, M., Diaz, I., Susmozas, A., Moreno, A.D., Guirado, M., Carreras, N., Ballesteros, M., Biogas from anaerobic digestion as an energy vector: current upgrading development, Energies, 14(10), 2742, 2021.
[7] Hahn, H., Krautkremer, B., Hartmann, K., Wachendorf, M., Review of concepts for a demand-driven biogas supply for flexible power generation, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 29, pp 383-393, 2014.
[8] Popp, J., Kovacs, S., Olah, J., Diveki, Z., Balazs, E., Bioeconomy: biomass and biomass-based energy supply and demand. New Biotechnology, 60, pp 76-84, 2021.
[9] Wesley, O., Zhao, Y., Nzihou, A., Pham, D., Lyczko, N., A review of biogas utilisation, purification and upgrading technologies. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 8 (2), pp 267–283, 2017.
[10] Awe, O., Zhao, Y., Nzihou, A., Minh, D., Lyczko, N., A review of biogas utilisation, purification and upgrading technologies: Review. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 8(2), pp 267-283, 2017.
[11] Angelidaki, I., Treua, L., Tsapekosa, P., Luoc, G., Campanarob, S., Wenzeld, H., Kougiasa, P., Biogas upgrading and utilization: current status and perspectives. Biotechnology Advances, 36 (2), pp 452-466, 2018.
[12] Benato, A., Macor, A., Italian Biogas Plants: Trend, Subsidies, Cost, Biogas Composition and Engine Emissions, Energies, 12, 979, 2019.
[13] Nyamukamba, P., Mukumba, P., Chikukwa, E.S., Makaka, G., Biogas Upgrading Approaches with Special Focus on Siloxane Removal—A Review, Energies, 13, 6088, 2020.
[14] Calbry-Muzyka, A., Madi, H., Rusch-Pfund, F., Gandiglio, M., Biollaz, S., Biogas composition from agricultural sources and organic fraction of municipal solid waste, Renewable Energy, 181, pp 1000-1007, 2022.
This work has received funds from the European Union, LIFE Programme, under Grant Agreement LIFE18 ENV/ES/000256 (LANDFILL BIOFUEL).
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022V/4.2/s18.07
Download PDF
Proceedings of 22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022
22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022, 06-08 December, 2022
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
55-62
06-08 December, 2022
website
8824
Biogas, Biomethane, Municipal Solid Waste, Renewable gases