Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +



Title: INVESTIGATION OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF ASSOCIATED METALS IN PRODUCTIVE WELLS FOR IN SITU RECOVERY (ISR) OF URANIUM

INVESTIGATION OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF ASSOCIATED METALS IN PRODUCTIVE WELLS FOR IN SITU RECOVERY (ISR) OF URANIUM
Yerkin Bektay; Gaukhar Turysbekova; Akmurat Altynbek; Bauyrzhan Shiderin; Baurzhan Duysebaev
10.5593/sgem2022V/4.2
1314-2704
English
22
4.2
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Uranium in situ recovery (ISR) is an effective method for extracting uranium from sandstone deposits. Many uranium deposits are characterized by the presence of associated metals: gold, platinum group metals and rare earth metals. For one of the uranium deposits in Kazakhstan, studies were carried out on sampling from productive wells at the ISR of uranium. An analysis was carried out for the content of uranium, rare earth elements, scandium, germanium, yttrium and other metals. For the study, samples were taken from productive wells used for uranium ISL. Studies have shown the presence of valuable associated metals in almost all productive wells where samples were taken. The analysis showed the possibility of extracting associated metals from productive solutions. It is noted that a higher effect can be achieved on mothballed wells when using leaching solutions with a higher redox potential. This will make it possible to obtain an additional economic effect from suspended (closed) wells, the number of which is over 70% of the total number of wells drilled in this field.
[1] Palenik S., Utsunomija S., Reich M. et al. // Am. Mineral. – 2004. –V. 89. – P. 1359–1366.
[2] Ciobanu C., Cook N., Pring A. et al. // Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. – 2009. – V. 73. – P. 1970–1999.
[3] Herrington R., Wilkinson J. // Geology. – 1993. – V. 21. – P. 539–542.
[4] Saunders J. // Geology. – 1990. – V. 18. – P. 757–760.
[5] Saunders J. // Econ. Geol. – 1994. – V. 89. – P. 628–638.
[6] Williams-Jones A., Bowell R., Migdisov A. // Elements. – 2009. – V. 5. – P. 281– 287.
[7] Cabri L., Chryssoulis S., De Villiers J. et al. // Can. Mineral. – 1989. – V. 27. – P. 353–362.
[8] Mumin A., Fleet M., Chryssoulis S. // Miner. Depos. – 1994. –V. 29. –P. 445–460.
[9] Hough R., Noble R., Reich M. // Ore Geology Rev. – 2011. –V. 42. –P. 55–61.
[10] Henley K. // Miner. Eng. – 1989. – V. 2. – № 4. – P. 459–470.
[11] Henley K. // Proc. Int. Conf.: Extractive metallurgy of gold and base metals. – Kalgoorlie, Austr. 1992. – Oct. 26–28. – P. 177–194.
[12] Vaughan J., Kyin A. // Miner. Mag. – 2004. – V. 68. – P. 255–277.
[13] Metallurgy of noble metals / Kotlyar Yu.A., Meretukov M.A., Strizhko L.S. / Moscow / MISIS / Publishing House "Ore and Metals", 2005, volume 1, p.177-182
[14] Bektay Y.K., Altynbek A.D., Turysbekova G.S., Shiderin B.N. “Actual trends in the development of uranium production at ISL. Abstracts of the International Scientific and Practical Conference of NAC Kazatomprom, November 7-8, 2019, pp. 91-92
This research has been/was/is funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. AP14870070)”.
conference
Proceedings of 22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022
22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022, 06-08 December, 2022
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
69-74
06-08 December, 2022
website
8826
in situ leaching, uranium, gold, rare metals, sorption, channel extractors