Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +



Title: ON THE IMPORTANCE OF PUBLIC VIEWS REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF PLASTIC POLLUTION IN CLUJ COUNTY, ROMANIA

ON THE IMPORTANCE OF PUBLIC VIEWS REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF PLASTIC POLLUTION IN CLUJ COUNTY, ROMANIA
Cristina Modoi; Denisa Dascal; Carmen Roba; Ramona Balc
10.5593/sgem2022V/4.2
1314-2704
English
22
4.2
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Plastic in the environment poses significant problems for the present, as well as for future generations. The consequences and the exposure of living organisms to plastic pollution are not yet fully understand. The risks to health, environment and climate, due to the ubiquity and persistence of plastic are of great interest.
The current study analyzes the perception of the Romanians regarding plastic pollution, in order to determine any pro-recycling behaviour of the local people and to recommend specific actions to reduce plastic pollution and the environmental risks associated with the studied region.
The population is an important agent in waste management, in addition to local and central authorities, sanitation and recycling companies and/or public institutions. In order to achieve our goals, we developed a questionnaire that includes a series of questions related to people’s behaviour, knowledge, perceptions and feelings about waste management in relation to the environment, reducing single-use plastic and plastic hazards.
The results demonstrated that 95.6% of the interviewees agreed that the use of plastic bags is harmful to the environment, 87.9% consider that plastic packaging of some products is sometimes unnecessary, 88.5% believe that recycling is the solution for removing plastic from the environment, and only 59.3% believe that the sanitation company is able to collect the waste selectively. The average of the answers related to the use of recyclable packaging shows that people are more and more concerned about the packaging of the purchased products, their recyclability, and the risks posed by plastic in the environment.
Based on the people’s responses and willingness to get involved in reducing environmental plastic pollution, some measures adapted to the region have been recommended as useful for increasing the plastic recycling rate and reducing risks to the environment.
[1] Zalasiewicz, J., Waters, C. N., Ivar do Sul, J. A., Corcoran, P. L., Barnosky, A. D., Cearreta, A., Edgeworth, M., Galuszka, A., Jeandel, C., Leinfelder, R., McNeill, J. R., Steffen, W., Summerhayes, C., Wagreich, M., Williams, M., Wolfe, A. P., & Yonan, Y. (2016). The geological cycle of plastics and their use as a stratigraphic indicator of the Anthropocene. Anthropocene, 13, 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2016.01.002.
[2] Galloway, T. S., Cole, M., & Lewis, C. (2017). Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1(5), 0116. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0116
[3] Nielsen, T. D., Hasselbalch, J., Holmberg, K., & Stripple, J. (2020). Politics and the plastic crisis: A review throughout the plastic life cycle. WIREs Energy and Environment, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.360
[4] Stanton, T., Kay, P., Johnson, M., Chan, F. K. S., Gomes, R. L., Hughes, J., Meredith, W., Orr, H. G., Snape, C. E., Taylor, M., Weeks, J., Wood, H., & Xu, Y. (2021). It’s the product not the polymer: Rethinking plastic pollution. WIREs Water, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1490
[5] Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2017). The new plastics economy: Catalysing action. Ellen MacArthur Foundation and World Economic Forum.
[6] Ribeiro, F., O’Brien, J. W., Galloway, T., & Thomas, K. V. (2019). Accumulation and fate of nano- and micro-plastics and associated contaminants in organisms. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 111, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.12.010
[7] World Health Organization. (2019). Microplastics in drinking-water. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/326499
[8] McNicholas, G., & Cotton, M. (2019). Stakeholder perceptions of marine plastic waste management in the United Kingdom. Ecological Economics, 163, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.022
[9] Hartley, B. L., Thompson, R. C., & Pahl, S. (2015). Marine litter education boosts children’s understanding and self-reported actions. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 90(1–2), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.10.049
[10] Sanderson, K. (2011). Chemistry: It’s not easy being green. Nature, 469(7328), 18– 20. https://doi.org/10.1038/469018a
[11] DIRECTIVE (EU) 2019/904 on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment. Official Journal of the European Union.
[12] Modoi, O.-C., & Vescan, A. (2021). Environmental Protection and Social Entrepreneurship Activities: The Vision of the Young People. InnovationsSustainability-Modernity-Openness Conference (ISMO’21), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2021009015.
conference
Proceedings of 22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022
22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022, 06-08 December, 2022
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
83-92
06-08 December, 2022
website
8828
plastic pollution, single-use plastic, plastic recycling, public perception, environmental awareness