Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: SUPPORT CENTER FOR MANAGEMENT AND PROMOTION IN SERVICE OF EUROPEAN RESEARCH PROJECTS
SUPPORT CENTER FOR MANAGEMENT AND PROMOTION IN SERVICE OF EUROPEAN RESEARCH PROJECTS

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Florica Toanca; Doina Nicolae; Georgeta Jeni Vasilescu; Simona Cornelia Andrei; Cristian Radu; Alin Alexandru Tilea
10.5593/sgem2022V/4.2/s19.51
10.5593/sgem2022V/4.2
1314-2704
978-619-7603-50-7
English
22
4.2
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Air Pollution and Climate Change
The Remote Sensing department from National Institute of R&D for Optoelectronics INOE, Romania, operates a complex research infrastructure and has multidisciplinary expertise spanning from laboratory/in-situ chemical analysis to Earth Observation (EO) techniques and applications. Infrastructure and personnel are mostly supported from projects financed by European Commission through FP7/Horizon 2020 (ended programs) and Horizon Europe (current programme) and other international calls (e.g., European Space Agency). In order to facilitate support of R&D projects submission/execution/reporting to Horizon Europe framework program competitions and other international calls, INOE is building a dedicated center until mid-2023, through PREPARE project - “Support Center for European Project Management and European Promotion”, funded under the Competitiveness Operational Program (2014- 2020), the action 1.1.3 "Creating synergies with the RDI actions of the European Union's HORIZON 2020 framework program and other international RDI programs". This work presents the results of our journey of drawing the main components of the management and promotion center that will mainly support large projects related to ACTRIS - Aerosol, Clouds and Trace Gases Research Infrastructure (ACTRIS). The center is intended to guide and support scientists’ approach from idea to grant negotiation stages and also to project implementation and reporting.
[1] Andersen, B., Henriksen, B., & Aarseth, W., Benchmarking of project management office establishment: Extracting best practices, Journal of Management in Engineering, 23(2), 97-104, 2007;
[2] Bettin, A. X., Tobar, C. M., Prado, D. P., & Da Silva, I. B., A PMO Installation for TI Project Management in a R&D Institution, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC), IEEE, 2010;
[3] Pemsel, S., Wiewiora, A., Project management office a knowledge broker in projectbased organisations. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 31, 31–42, 2013;
[4] Fernandes, G., Bacelar Pinto, E., Araujo, M., Machado, R.-J., The roles of a Programme and Project Management Office to support collaborative university– industry R&D. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell., 31, 1–26, 2018;
[5] Hurt, M., Thomas, J.L., Building Value Through Sustainable Project Management Offices. Proj. Manag. J., 40, 55–72, 2009;
[6] Pansini, F., Terzieva M., Challenges and Benefits on the Path towards Discovering PMO: Cases from Italian Banking Sector. Procedia Technol., 9, pp 627–637, 2013;
[7] Pinto, A., Cota, M.F., Levin, G., The PMO Maturity Cube, a Project Management Office Maturity Model. In Proceedings of the PMI Research and Education Congress, Washington, DC, USA, 14 July 2010;
[8] Jalal, M., Koosha, S., Identifying organizational variables affecting project management office characteristics and analyzing their correlations in the Iranian project-oriented organizations of the construction industry. Int. J. Proj. Manag., 33, pp 458–466, 2015;
[9] Project Management Institute (PMI), A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK®Guide) (5th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute Inc., 2013;
[10] Unger, B., N., Gemunden, H., G. & Aubry, M., The three roles of a project portfolio management office: Their impact on portfolio management execution and success. International Journal of Project Management 30, pp 608–620, 2012;
[11] Desouza, K. C., & Evaristo, J. R., Project management offices: A case of knowledge-based archetypes, International Journal of Information Management, 26(5), pp 414-423, 2006;
[12] Monteiro, A., Santos, V. & Varajao, J. (2016). Project Management Office Models – a review. Procedia Computer Science 100, pp 1085 – 1094, 2016;
[13] Spalek, S., Kuhn, T., Dayton, S., Real-life examples of how to ensure PMO alignment with organizational needs, Proceedings of the PMI Global Congress -EMEA, Barcelona, Spain, 2016.
Authors would like to acknowledge European Regional Development Fund through Competitiveness Operational Programme 2014-2020, Action 1.1.3 Creating synergies with H2020 Programme, project H2020 Support Center for European project management and European promotion, MYSMIS code 107874. Part of the work performed for this study was funded by the Romanian National Core Program Contract No.18N/2019 and further support was provided by the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalisation, through Program 1—Development of the national research-development system, Subprogram 1.2—Institutional performance: Projects to finance the excellent RDI, Contract no. 18PFE/30.12.2021.
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022V/4.2/s19.51
Download PDF
Proceedings of 22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022
22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022, 06-08 December, 2022
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
407-414
06-08 December, 2022
website
8868
center, project management, research and innovation projects, remote sensing