Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING COMPONENTS IN THE PRODUCTION OF GREEN CONCRETE
METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING COMPONENTS IN THE PRODUCTION OF GREEN CONCRETE

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Lilita Abele; Anna Muhina
10.5593/sgem2022V/6.2/s26.56
10.5593/sgem2022V/6.2
1314-2704
978-619-7603-52-1
English
22
6.2
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Green Buildings Technologies and Materials
The construction sector generates more than a quarter of all carbon dioxide emissions, which contributes to the deterioration of the environmental situation in the world. This article describes one of the ways to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from construction by changing the type of concrete components. In this research, a comparison analysis of various criteria of Portland cement and Ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) was carried out. The main method for solving the problem of this study is the Multicriteria analysis. This tool makes it possible to compare various alternatives, make a rating and determine the best of them.
Purpose: a method of reducing carbon dioxide emissions from the construction sector by changing the type of concrete components. Result: determination of the optimal component for concrete production. Target audience: factories for the production of concrete and products from it, contractors, developers. Object of the research: tables for comparing materials. Subject of the research: decarburization of concrete by determining the best component.
[1] Department for Communities and Local Government, Multi-criteria analysis: a manual. Communities and Local Government Publications, London. 2009. Available at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/corporate/pdf/1132618.pdf
[2] Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR). 2020. Fossil CO2 emissions report of all world countries (Latvia). Available at: https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu
[3] International Energy Agency. 2021. Available at: https://www.iea.org/topics/buildings
[4] Jiaying, T.; Xianguo, W. Eco-footprint-based life-cycle eco-efficiency assessment of building projects. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 39, 160–168.Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259996668_Eco-footprint-based_lifecycle_eco-efficiency_assessment_of_building_projects
[5] Keun-Hyeok Yang, Eun-A Seo, Yeon-Back Jung. Effect of Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag on Life-Cycle Environmental Impact of Concrete. Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute. 2014. 26(1). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264180266_Effect_of_Ground_Granulated_Bl ast-Furnace_Slag_on_Life-Cycle_Environmental_Impact_of_Concrete
[6] Mitch Jacoby. Alternative materials could shrink concrete’s giant carbon footprint. Chemical and engineering news. 2020. Volume 98, Issue 45. Available at: https://cen.acs.org/materials/inorganic-chemistry/Alternative-materials-shrinkconcretes-giant/98/i45
[7] Muhendislik ve Doga Bilimleri Fakultesi, Insaat Muh. Significance of Concrete Production in Terms of Carbondioxide Emissions: Social and Environmental Impacts. Journal of polytechnic. 2018; 21(2), p. 369-378. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/418238
[8] Pacheco-Torgal, F. Introduction to biopolymers and biotech admixtures for ecoefficient construction materials. In Biopolymers and Biotech Admixtures for EcoEfficient Construction Materials; Wood head Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2016. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780081002148/biopolymers-andbiotech-admixtures-for-eco-efficient-construction-materials
[9] Peter Seymour. Sustainable Cement. Passive house + sustainable building.2007. Available at: https://passivehouseplus.ie/articles/sustainable-buildingtechnology/sustainable-cement
[10] Roh, S.J.; Tae, S.H.; Shin, S.W.; Woo, J.H. A Study on the Comparison of Characterization of Environmental Impact of Major Building Material for Building Life Cycle Assessment. Archit. Inst. Korea 2013. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287333895_Green_Template_for_Life_Cycle _Assessment_of_Buildings_Based_on_Building_Information_Modeling_Focus_on_Em bodied_Environmental_Impact
[11] Taehyoung, K.; Sungho, T.; Keunhyuk, Y. Development of the Eco-efficiency evaluation method for Concrete. Korea Concrete Institute 2015, 35, 437–438. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305663257_Proposal_for_the_Evaluation_of_ Eco-Efficient_Concrete
[12] Taehyoung, K.; Sungho, T.; Sungjoon, S.; George, F.; Keunhyek, Y. An optimization System for Concrete LifeCycle Cost and Related CO2 Emissions. Sustainability 2016, 8, 361. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/4/361
[13] Worldometer. Available at: https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/latviaco2-emissions/
[14] Zuoren, N. Chapter 3—Eco-Materials and Life-Cycle Assessment. In Green and Sustainable Manufacturing of Advanced Material; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 31–76. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303416067_Eco-Materials_and_LifeCycle_Assessment
The article was written with the financial support of the project “Promotion of research, innovation and international cooperation in science at Liepaja University”, Project No. 1.1.1.5/18/I/018
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022V/6.2/s26.56
Download PDF
Proceedings of 22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022
22nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2022, 06-08 December, 2022
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
437-444
06-08 December, 2022
website
8950
GGBS, Portland cement, green concrete