Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +



Title: STRESS FIELD IN TARGU JIU SEISMOTECTONIC AREA (ROMANIA): INSIGHTS FROM THE INVERSION OF EARTHQUAKE FOCAL MECHANISMS

STRESS FIELD IN TARGU JIU SEISMOTECTONIC AREA (ROMANIA): INSIGHTS FROM THE INVERSION OF EARTHQUAKE FOCAL MECHANISMS
Andreea Craiu; Mihail Diaconescu; Marius Craiu; Marius Mihai; Alexandru Marmureanu
10.5593/sgem2023/1.1
1314-2704
English
23
1.1
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
An intense seismic activity started in February 2023, close to Targu Jiu city, in the Oltenia region (Romania). The strongest events occurred on 13th and 14th February, the first shock with ML=5.2, and respectively the second shock with ML=5.7. These main shocks were followed by specific seismicity bursts (about 2000 foreshocks were registered). The focal depth of the events ranges from 1 to 20 km, most of them being situated in the 10-20 km depth interval.
The area of interest is tectonically complex with various types of faults and it takes place at the contact between the Getic Depression, to the south, and the Southern Carpathians, to the north. The seismic sequence of Tg. Jiu occurred in the northern part of the Valea Motrului-Valea Oltetului area (part of Getic Depression) and is characterized by extensional faults, which show a general direction of ENE - WSW.
For the seismic source delineated in Tg. Jiu area, the stress field has an extensional stress regime (?1 almost vertical), with maximum horizontal stress (SHmax) oriented in the NNE-SSW direction. The resulting SHmax orientation and normal fault regime with a radial component (R'=0.5) are consistent with the observed geological setting.
The results of this study are useful for assessing past and current tectonic activities and future research of the epicentral area.
[1] Craiu A., Craiu M., Mihai M. Manea E. F., Marmureanu A., Vrancea intermediatedepth focal mechanism catalog: a useful instrument for local and regional stress field estimation. Acta Geophys. 71, 29–52 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-022-00906-4, 2022.
[2] Popescu E., Craiu A., Craiu M., Popa M., Radulian M, Earthquake sequence in western getic depression (Romania), December 2011 - January 2012: source characteristics and seismotectonics. EGU General Assembly 2012, held 22-27 April, 2012 in Vienna, Austria., p.7118.
[3] Radulian M., Popescu E., Borleanu F., Diaconescu M., Source parameters of the December 2011 – January 2012 earthquake sequence in Southern Carpathians, Romania. Tectonophysics. 623. 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.03.014.
[4] Oros E., Popa M., Paulescu D., Placinta A. O., & Ghita C., A refined catalogue of focal mechanisms for the Intra-Carpathian region of Romania: implications for the stress field and seismogenic features assessment. Annals of Geophysics. 65(6). 10.4401/ag-8387, 2023.
[5] Popa M., Chircea A., Dinescu R., Neagoe C., Grecu B., Borleanu F., “Romanian Earthquake Catalogue (ROMPLUS)”, Mendeley Data, V2, doi: 10.17632/tdfb4fgghy.2, 2022.
[6] Matenco L., Bertotti G., Dinu C., Cloetingh S., Tertiary tectonic evolution of the external South Carpathians and the adjacent Moesian platform (Romania). Tectonics, 16 (6), 896–911, 1997b.
[7] Armeanu I., Chircea A., Ciobanu I., Craiu A., Craiu M., et al., “Database of the 2023 seismic sequence recorded in Gorj area (Romania)”, Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/ds4hwchkp7.1, 2023.
[8] Krezsek C., Lapadat A., Matenco L., Arnberger K., Barbu V., Olaru R., Strain partitioning at orogenic contacts during rotation, strike–slip and oblique convergence: Paleogene–Early Miocene evolution of the contact between the South Carpathians and Moesia. Glob. Planet. Chang. 103, 63–81, 2013.
[9] Reasenberg P. and Oppenheimer D., FPFIT, FPPLOT, and FPPAGE: FORTRAN computer programs for calculating and displaying earthquake fault-plane solutions. U.S Geol. Surv. Open-file rept. 85-739, 109pp, 1985.
[10] R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.Rproject. org/, 2018.
[11] Jonathan M. Lees, RFOC: Graphics for Spherical Distributions and Earthquake Focal Mechanisms. R package version 3.4-6. https://CRAN.Rproject. org/package=RFOC, 2018.
[12] Delvaux D., Sperner B., New aspects of tectonic stress inversion with reference to the TENSOR program. Geological Society London Special Publications 212(1):75-100 DOI:10.1144/GSL.SP.2003.212.01.06, 2003.
[13] Delvaux D., Barth A., African Stress Pattern from formal inversion of focal mechanism data. Implications for rifting dynamics. Tectonophysics 482, 105-128, 2010.
[14] Kaverina A.N., Lander A.V., Prozorov A.G., Global creepex distribution and its relation to earthquake-source geometry and tectonic origin, Geophys J Int, 125 (1), 249- 265, 1996.
This study was carried out within the National Research Program (project SOL4RISC no PN23360101), and SETTING project, cofunded from the Regional Development European Fund (FEDR) through the Operational Competitivity Programme 2014-2020, Contract No. 336/390012.
conference
Proceedings of 23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023
23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023, 03 - 09 July, 2023
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference-SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Russian Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Russian Acad Arts; Turkish Acad Sci.
601-608
03 - 09 July, 2023
website
9061
seismic sequence, focal mechanism, stress tensor, seismicity, Targu Jiu area