Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +



Title: THE GEOMAGNETIC STORM ON MARCH 13-14, 2022: SPECTRAL CHARACTERISTICS IN ULRA-LOW FREQUENCY RANGE

THE GEOMAGNETIC STORM ON MARCH 13-14, 2022: SPECTRAL CHARACTERISTICS IN ULRA-LOW FREQUENCY RANGE
Maria Chamati
10.5593/sgem2023/1.1
1314-2704
English
23
1.1
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Geomagnetic storms cause disturbances in the Earth's magnetosphere, which differ in their spectral composition at different latitudes. The study of local spectral characteristics, both via remote sensing and ground-based data, provides valuable information on the dynamic processes in the Earth's magnetosphere and the longitudinal propagation of the corresponding disturbances.
The local spectral characteristics of the moderate (G2) geomagnetic storm that occurred March 13–14, 2022, are obtained. A time series of data recorded at Conrad Observatory, Austria, on the variations of the geomagnetic field along the X and Y directions in the ultra-low frequency (ULF) range corresponding to periods 1–900s is analyzed. Through the application of coherent analysis based on wavelet transformation, the time periods and frequency intervals where the two components of the geomagnetic field have a high degree of correlation with each other are determined. The Morlet wavelet method is then applied, and the power spectrum is found. Two types of ULF waves are clearly visible in the spectra of the Pc3 and Pc5 frequency bands recorded during the storm. Pc5 waves occur during all phases of the storm, while Pc3 waves mainly occur during the main phase. Their relationship with temporal changes in the parameters of the solar wind is studied.
[1] Lakhina GS, Tsurutani BT. Geomagnetic storms: historical perspective to modern view. Geoscience Letters 2016;3:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-016-0037-4.
[2] Borovsky JE, Denton MH. Differences between CME-driven storms and CIR-driven storms. Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) 2006;111:A07S08. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011447.
[3] Miloshev N, Trifonova P, Georgiev I, Marinova T, Slabakova V, Dobrev N, et al. National geoinformation center - Scientific infrastructure for dissemination of accurate, durable and reliable geodata and products, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214- 4609.201902671.
[4] Matzka J, Stolle C, Yamazaki Y, Bronkalla O, Morschhauser A. The Geomagnetic Kp Index and Derived Indices of Geomagnetic Activity. Space Weather 2021;19:e2020SW002641. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002641.
[5] Chamati M. CHARACTERISTICS OF Pc5 PULSATIONS ACTIVITY AT MID LATITUDES DURING DECEMBER 2019. vol. 22, 2022, p. 509–16. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022/1.1/s05.059.
[6] Chamati M, Andonov B. Pc5 PULSATIONS OBSERVED DURING THE GEOMAGNETIC STORM ON 12 MAY 2021. vol. 22, 2022, p. 541–8. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022/1.1/s05.063.
[7] Du A, Sun W, Xu W, Gao X. The frequency variation of Pc5 ULF waves during a magnetic storm. Earth, Planets and Space 2005;57:619–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03351841.
[8] Regi M, De Lauretis M, Francia P. Pc5 geomagnetic fluctuations in response to solar wind excitation and their relationship with relativistic electron fluxes in the outer radiation belt. Earth, Planets and Space 2015;67:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-015- 0180-8.
[9] Menk FW. Spectral structure of mid-latitude Pc3-4 geomagnetic pulsations. J Geomagn Geoelec 1988;40:33–61. https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.40.33.
[10] Dai L, Takahashi K, Lysak R, Wang C, Wygant JR, Kletzing C, et al. Storm time occurrence and spatial distribution of Pc4 poloidal ULF waves in the inner magnetosphere: A Van Allen Probes statistical study. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 2015;120:4748–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021134.
[11] Andonov B, Bojilova R, Mukhtarov P. Global distribution of total electron content response to weak geomagnetic activity. Comptes Rendus de L’Academie Bulgare Des Sciences 2021;74:1032–42. https://doi.org/10.7546/CRABS.2021.07.10.
[12] Hynonen R, Tanskanen EI, Francia P. Solar cycle evolution of ULF wave power in solar wind and on ground. J Space Weather Space Clim 2020;10:43. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020046.
[13] Kepko L, Spence HE, Singer HJ. ULF waves in the solar wind as direct drivers of magnetospheric pulsations. Geophysical Research Letters 2002;29:39-1-39–4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL014405.
[14] Hudson M, Denton R, Lessard M, Miftakhova E, Anderson R. A study of Pc-5 ULF oscillations. Annales Geophysicae 2004;22:289–302. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-289-2004.
[15] Anderson BJ. Ultra-low-frequency magnetic pulsations in the earth’s magnetosphere. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest 1990;11:239–54.
This study is supported by the Contract No D01-164/28.07.2022 (Project "National Geoinformation Center (NGIC))", financed by the National Roadmap for Scientific Infrastructure 2020-2027 of Bulgaria. We thank the OMNIWEB database for data provided. The results presented in this paper rely on the data collected at Conrad Observatory, Austria. We thank Zentralanstalt fur Meteorologie und Geodynamik (ZAMG), for supporting its operation and INTERMAGNET for promoting high standards of magnetic observatory practice (www.intermagnet.org).
conference
Proceedings of 23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023
23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023, 03 - 09 July, 2023
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference-SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Russian Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Russian Acad Arts; Turkish Acad Sci.
609-616
03 - 09 July, 2023
website
9062
geomagnetic storm, ULF-waves, spectral, wavelet