Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +



Title: MONITORING OF TECTONIC MOVEMENTS IN THE ADRIATIC REGION THROUGH NATIONAL PERMANENT SATELLITE NETWORKS

MONITORING OF TECTONIC MOVEMENTS IN THE ADRIATIC REGION THROUGH NATIONAL PERMANENT SATELLITE NETWORKS
Ethem Bejko; Rrapo Ormeni; Bledar Sina; Eduart Blloshmi; Dionald Mucaj
10.5593/sgem2023/2.1
1314-2704
English
23
2.1
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
The purpose of this study is the analysis of the dynamics of tectonic movements accompanied by two strong seismic events that occurred in the Durres area (Albania) in September-November 2019, through the use of GNSS technology, applied to national permanent satellite geodetic networks. Previous studies have been carried out on our study area by foreign authors from Croatia, Greece, and Italy. For our study case, we relied on geodetic weekly data secured from the Bulletins of Italian and Austrian stations, BSW52, of some of the constituent points of the two national permanent satellite networks of Italy (5 points) and Albania (6 points), located on both sides of the dividing line between the Eurasian tectonic plate and the Adriatic microplate. The analysis of the data secured in 7 campaigns was carried out by grouping them into 3 main analysis periods: the period before the September earthquake (F1-F4, called A), the period during the earthquakes (F4-F5, called B), and the period after the November earthquake (F5-F7, called C). It turns out that in plan the speed of movement in the area is: -0.00294m/year for period (A), -0.01912m/year for period (B), and -0.00305m/year for period (C). While in height, the speeds of movement are: 0.00130m/year for period (A), -0.04268m/year for period (B), and 0.00273m/year for period (C). These vectors also show us that the intensity T between period (B) and the average periods (A, C) is about 17 times in plan and 42 times in height. Combined this analysis with data that includes strong consecutive seismic events in the area, we believe that this intensity T can lead us to the most accurate predictability of the moment of the occurrence of the next tectonic energy release, thus of the next earthquake.
[1] Altiner, Y., Colic, K., Marjanovic, R., Some preliminary results and analysis of different geodynamic techniques with special remark on GPS and tiltmeter measurements in Croatia, January 2000. 12WCEE 2000, nr 0569, 2000.
[2] Mazzoli. S., Helman. M., Neogene patterns of relative platemotion for Africa-Europe: some implications for recent central Mediterranean tectonics, Geologische Rundschau, vol 83, pp 464-468, 1994.
[3] Ormeni. Rr., Kociaj. S., Fundo. A., Daja. Sh., Doda. V., "Moderate earthquakes in Albania during 2009 and their associated seismogenic zones", Italian Journal of Geosciences, Vol 132, Nr 2, 2013, Italy, 2013.
[4] Aliaj. SH., Sulstarova. E., Muco. B., Kociu. S., Seismo - tectonic map of Albania, scale 1:500.000. Seismological Institute, Tirane, 2001.
[5] Sulstarova, E., Kociaj, S., Aliaj, Sh., Seismic region-alization of PSR of Albania. Publishing House of “8 Nentori” Tirana, pp 1-297, 1980.
[6] Ormeni, Rr., Hoxha, I., Naco, P., Dashamir, G., The strong earthquake of 26 November 2019 (Mw 6.4) and its associate active tectonic of Durresi region in Albania, Europen Geosciences Union, General Assembly, (EGU2020), Vienna, Austria, 2020.
[7] Oncel, A.O., Wilson, T.H., Space-time correlations of seismotectonic parameters and examples from Japan and Turkey preceding the Izmit earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol 92, pp 339–350, 2002.
[8] Marku. S., Ormeni. R., Panza. G., “Seismic characterization of Tirana - Durres - Lezha region (northwestern Albania) and analysis effort through NDSHA method”. Earthquakes and sustainable infrastructure. Neodeterministic (NDSHA) aproch guarantes prevention rather than cure. Elsevier. Elsevier.com/book and journals, 2021.
[9] Marjanovic. M., Bacic. Z., Basic. T., Determination of horizontal and vertical movements of the Adriatic microplate based on GPS measurements, Croatian State Geodetic Administration, with 104 Readings DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-20338-1_84, 2012.
[10] Lambeck. K., Sea level in Roman time in the Central Mediterranean and implications for recent change, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol 224(3), pp 563-575, 2004.
[11] Rossikopoulos. D., Fotiou. A., Pikridas. C., Bitharis. S., Models and techniques in geodetic monitoring of tectonic deformations in Greece, Bulletin of Geological Sciences of Greece, vol. L, pp 1570-1582 Proceedings, in the 14th International Conference, Thessaloniki, 2016.
[12] Cenni. N., Viti. M., Mantovani. E., Geodetic spatial data (GPS) and earthquake prediction: examples from the Italian Geodetic Network, Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata Vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 129-150, 2015.
conference
Proceedings of 23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023
23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023, 03 - 09 July, 2023
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Russian Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Russian Acad Arts; Turkish Acad Sci.
237-244
03 - 09 July, 2023
website
9110
monitoring, tectonic movements, earthquake, geodetic networks