Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE WAYS OF RECYCLING GLASS CONTAINERS EFFICIENCY
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE WAYS OF RECYCLING GLASS CONTAINERS EFFICIENCY

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Valeriy P. Meshalkin; Dmitriy Kh. Mikhailidi; Valeriy S. Petrosyan; Levon A. Tavadyan; Alexander V. Malkov
10.5593/sgem2023/5.1/s20.09
10.5593/sgem2023/5.1
1314-2704
978-619-7603-60-6
English
23
5.1
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Ecology and Environmental Protection
A comparative analysis has been carried out on a set of indicators of two ways of recycling glass containers – collecting in retail stores and fast washing of containers at beverage bottling plants and processing into cullet, taking into consideration the whole life cycle of glassware production, use, recycling and utilization. Methods of systematization and statistical generalization were applied for comparative analysis. The specified work was based on data, that were received from various glass manufacturing enterprises during the review procedure of the Russian National Reference Document on the Best Available Techniques (BAT) “Glass Production” in 2022, as well as according to statistical information and scientific publications. Russian Reference Documents are known in the Eurasian Economic Union and discussed as a possible background for the future research in the field on BAT and resource efficiency enhancement. The contribution of various performance factors to the cost of production and distribution of glass containers and the added value of its recycling is assessed. Economical and ecological potential and the possible impact of a change in the prevailing method of recycling glass containers on the economics of glass containers manufacturing are determined. A mathematical model has been developed that makes it possible to calculate efficiency factors for various options for resource consumption and transport logistics.
[1] Meshalkin V. P., Dovi V. G., Bobkov V. I., Belyakov A. V., Butusov O. B., Garabadzhiu A. V., Burukhina T. F., Khodchenko S. M. State of the Art and Research Development Prospects of Energy and Resource-Efficient Environmentally Safe Chemical Process Systems Engineering, Mendeleev Communications, 2021, vol. 31, is. 5, pp. 593-604. DOI: 10.1016/j.mencom.2021.09.003.
[2] Tikhonova I., Guseva T., Averochkin E., Shchelchkov K. Best Available Techniques and Best Environmental Management Practices: Collaboration between Industries and Regions, Procedia Environmental Science, Engineering and Management, 2021, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 495-505.
[3] Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on Industrial Emissions (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control) (Recast) (Text with EEA Relevance), Official Journal of the European Union, 17.12.2010, L 334/17-L 334/119. URL: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2010/75/oj.
[4] Hjort M., Skobelev D., Almgren R., Guseva T., Koh T. Best Available Techniques and Sustainable Development Goals, Proceedings of the 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2019. 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2019, 9 - 11 December, 2019, vol. 4.2, pp. 185-192. DOI: 10.5593/sgem2019V/4.2/S06.025.
[5] Almgren R., Skobelev D. Evolution of Technology and Technology Governance, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2020, vol. 6, is. 2, p. 22. DOI: 10.3390/joitmc6020022.
[6] Best Available Techniques (BAT) for Preventing and Controlling Industrial Pollution, Activity 5: Value Chain Approaches to Determining BAT for Industrial Installations, OECD, Environment, Health and Safety, Environment Directorate, 2022. URL: https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/risk-management/value-chain-approaches-todetermining- best-available-techniques-industrial-installations.pdf.
[7] Golub O. V., Sanzharovskii A. Y., Mikhailidi D. K. et al. Carbon Footprint of the Life Cycle of Glass Containers, Glass and Ceramics, 2022, vol. 79, pp. 306-311. DOI: 10.1007/s10717-022-00505-1.
[8] Gallucci T., Lagioia G., Piccinno P., Lacalamita A., Pontrandolfo A., Paiano A. Environmental Performance Scenarios in the Production of Hollow Glass Containers for Food Packaging: an LCA Approach, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, vol. 26, pp. 785–798. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-020-01797-7.
[9] Landi D., Germani M., Marconi M. Analyzing the Environmental Sustainability of Glass Bottles Reuse in an Italian Wine Consortium, Procedia CIRP, 2019, vol. 80, pp. 399-404. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.01.054.
[10] Winans K.S., Mkrtchyan I., Goncalves J.P.M. Approaches to the Circular Economy in Armenia and Portugal: An Overview, Eds: Alexandros Stefanakis, Ioannis Nikolaou, Circular Economy and Sustainability, Elsevier, 2022, pp. 651-661, ISBN 9780128198179. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819817-9.00003-X.
[11] Dorokhina E.Y., Kharchenko S.G. Circular Economy in Russia, Ghosh, S.K., Ghosh, S.K. (Eds) Circular Economy: Recent Trends in Global Perspective. Springer, Singapore, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-0913-8_10.
[12] Fresan U., Errendal S., Craig W.J., Sabate J. Does the Size Matter? A Comparative Analysis of the Environmental Impact of Several Packaged Foods, Science of the Total Environment, 2019, vol. 687, pp. 369–379. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.109.
[13] Guseva T.V., Molchanova Y.P., Averochkin E.M., Vartanyan M.A., Begak M.V. Prospects for Adopting the Best Available Technologies and Moving to Comprehensive Environmental Permits in the Production of Glass and Ceramics (Review), Glass and Ceramics, 2014, vol. 71, no 7-8, pp. 245-253. DOI: 10.1007/s10717-014-9662-6.
[14] Avetisyan S. Digitalization of the Agricultural Sector of Armenia as a Fast Path to Technical Progress, Amberd Bulletin, 2022, no 6, pp. 20-28. DOI: 10.52174/2579- 2989_2022.6-20.
[15] Armenia – Bottles, Jars and Other Containers of Glass – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights Please mention the Source. URL: https://www.indexbox.io/store/armenia-bottles-jars-and-other-containers-of-glassmarket- report-analysis-and-forecast-to-2020/.
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2023/5.1/s20.09
Download PDF
Proceedings of 23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023
23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023, 03 - 09 July, 2023
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
73-80
03 - 09 July, 2023
website
9277
economic and resource efficiency, environmental performance, glass containers recycling, best available techniques, product life cycle

24th SGEM International Conference on Earth & Planetary Sciences


International GeoConference SGEM2024
28 June - 8 July, 2024 / Albena, Bulgaria

Read More		   

SGEM Vienna GREEN "Green Science for Green Life"


Extended Scientific Sessions SGEM Vienna GREEN
25 - 29 November, 2024 / Vienna, Austria

Read More
   

A scientific platform for Art-Inspired Scientists!


The Magical World Where Science meets Art
Vienna, Austria

Read More