Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EXTRACTION METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PAHS IN SOILS USING GC-MS
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EXTRACTION METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PAHS IN SOILS USING GC-MS

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
A. Kamalova; P. Galitskaya; A. Gordeev; A. Khamieva; P. Kuryntseva
10.5593/sgem2023/5.1/s20.11
10.5593/sgem2023/5.1
1314-2704
978-619-7603-60-6
English
23
5.1
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Ecology and Environmental Protection
Soil contamination by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is a widespread concern due to the high potential for human exposure through inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact. In this study, we compared the efficiency of three different methods for PAHs extraction from model samples, including ultrasonic (US), mechanical shaking and purification with commercial QuEChERS kit (Shq), and ultrasonic extraction coupled with QuEChERS (USq) by gas chromatography coupled to a triple quadrupole tandem mass-spectrometry (GC-MS).
The results showed that in the ultrasonic extraction with subsequent purification using QuEChERS, the content of PAHs in the sample varied from 86.91 to 2211.60 ng/g. Whereas, in mechanical shaking method, this range was in the range 1.56-761.20 ng/g. In the case of ultrasonic extraction without sorbent purification, only for acenaphthene, fluorene, and benzo(g,h,i)perylene, the values were higher compared to the other two methods: 285.78±27.56 ng/g, 577.48±73.62 ng/g, and 266.35±177.30 ng/g, respectively. The comparison of PAH extraction efficiency showed that the combination of ultrasonic extraction and purification with QuEChERS (USq) was the most efficient method and rapid, obtaining the highest yields for all tested PAHs.
[1] Fabbri D, Rombola A G, Torri C и Spokas K A 2013 Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biochar and biochar amended soil Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
[2] Buhaug H и Urdal H 2013 An urbanization bomb? Population growth and social disorder in cities Glob. Environ. Chang.
[3] Kim K H, Jahan S A, Kabir E и Brown R J C 2013 A review of airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their human health effects Environ. Int.
[4] Blankenhorn I, Meijer D и van Delft R J 1992 Inter-laboratory comparison of methods used for analysing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil samples Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem.
[5] USEPA 2008 USEPA, Office of Solid Waste (2008) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) Encycl. Earth Sci. Ser. Accessed 1
[6] Keith L H 2015 The Source of U.S. EPA’s Sixteen PAH Priority Pollutants Polycycl. Aromat. Compd. 35 147–60
[7] Slowik-Borowiec M, Szpyrka E, Ksiazek-Trela P и Podbielska M 2022 Simultaneous Determination of Multi-Class Pesticide Residues and PAHs in Plant Material and Soil Samples Using the Optimized QuEChERS Method and Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis Molecules
[8] Song Y F, Jing X, Fleischmann S и Wilke B M 2002 Comparative study of extraction methods for the determination of PAHs from contaminated soils and sediments Chemosphere
[9] Banjoo D R и Nelson P K 2005 Improved ultrasonic extraction procedure for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments J. Chromatogr. A
[10] Oluseyi T, Olayinka K, Alo B и Smith R M 2011 Comparison of extraction and clean-up techniques for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in contaminated soil samples African J. Environ. Sci. Technol.
[11] Berset J D, Ejem M, Holzer R и Lischer P 1999 Comparison of different drying, extraction and detection techniques for the determination of priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in background contaminated soil samples Anal. Chim. Acta
[12] Lian W, Ren F, Tang L и Dong D 2016 Analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette samples using gel permeation chromatography clean-up by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry Microchem. J.
[13] Auer W и Malissa H 1990 Determination of trace amounts of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil Anal. Chim. Acta
[14] Martens D, Maguhn J, Spitzauer P и Kettrup A 1997 Occurrence and distribution of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in an agricultural ecosystem Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem.
[15] Tang L, Tang X Y, Zhu Y G, Zheng M H и Miao Q L 2005 Contamination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in urban soils in Beijing, China Environ. Int.
The work is carried out in accordance with the Strategic Academic Leadership Program «Priority 2030» of the Kazan Federal University of the Government of the Russian Federation.
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2023/5.1/s20.11
Download PDF
Proceedings of 23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023
23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023, 03 - 09 July, 2023
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
89-96
03 - 09 July, 2023
website
9279
urban soil, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), gas chromatography with mass-selective detector (GC-MS), extraction, QuEChERS

24th SGEM International Conference on Earth & Planetary Sciences


International GeoConference SGEM2024
28 June - 8 July, 2024 / Albena, Bulgaria

Read More		   

SGEM Vienna GREEN "Green Science for Green Life"


Extended Scientific Sessions SGEM Vienna GREEN
25 - 29 November, 2024 / Vienna, Austria

Read More
   

A scientific platform for Art-Inspired Scientists!


The Magical World Where Science meets Art
Vienna, Austria

Read More