Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +



Title: DESIGN THINKING AND ACTION COMPETENCE: FILLING THE GAP WITH UNIVERSITY TRAINING

DESIGN THINKING AND ACTION COMPETENCE: FILLING THE GAP WITH UNIVERSITY TRAINING
Mara Zeltina; Marharyta Radomska
10.5593/sgem2023/5.1
1314-2704
English
23
5.1
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
The transition to sustainable pathways of economic development depends on the clear understanding of the sustainability principles, but it also needs ability to evaluate critically conventional professional practices and rethink them into sustainable one. However, the previous years of struggling for economic transformations have showed a serious issue – lack of action competence when it comes to the implementation of the sustainable solutions. The design thinking is a core of professional competency and high performance, but it must also incorporate skills to act and perform according to the plan. It is especially important for projects embedding sustainable solutions, which are often seen as a complicated and not profitable activity, demanding considerable investments. Moreover, this kind of perception is often demonstrated by all stakeholders – developers, businessmen and authorities. Thus, we believe that action competence must be a fundamental element of design thinking development in students. The most suitable platform for this is project-based learning, which should include a block of feasibility assessment and implementation planning. The paper presents the description of training methods and approaches for building the bridge between design thinking and action competence, based on the project-based courses delivered in Liepaja University and National Aviation University. The methodology of the research included three rounds of experiments, involving student works rating, student self-assessment and peer-review, which undergo analysis as well. The results of the work offer recommendations on the improvement of project design skills and action competence.
[1] Eisenbart B., Bouwman S., Voorendt J., McKillagan S., Kuys B., Ranscombe C. (2022). Implementing design thinking to drive innovation in technical design, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 10(3), pp 141-160. doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2022.2048698
[2] Luka I. (2014). Design thinking in pedagogy. The Journal of Education, Culture, and Society, 5(2), pp 63-74. DOI:10.15503/jecs20142.63.74
[3] Shapira H., Ketchie A., Nehe M. (2017). The integration of design thinking and strategic sustainable development, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, pp 277-287. doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.092
[4] Poursharif G., Doss T. P., Broadbent R., Knight G. (2021). Developing global engineers through interdisciplinary PBL and design thinking. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, Austria, pp 194-198. doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON46332.2021.9453869
[5] Glen R., Suciu C., Baughn C. C., Anson R. (2015). Teaching design thinking in business schools, The International Journal of Management Education, 13(2), pp 182- 19. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2015.05.001
[6] Panke S. (2019). Design thinking in education: Perspectives, opportunities and challenges. Open Education Studies, 1(1), pp 281-306. doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0022
[7] Koh J.H.L., Chai C.S., Wong B., Hong H.Y. (2015). Design Thinking and Education, Design Thinking for Education. Springer, Singapore, pp 1-15. doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-444-3_1
[8] Gillet D., Voneche-Cardia I. (2021). Promoting Critical and Design Thinking Activities to Tackle Sustainable Development Goals in Higher Education, World Engineering Education Forum/Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF/GEDC), Spain, pp 224-230. DOI:10.1109/WEEF/GEDC53299.2021.9657466
[9] Chen S.Y., Liu S.Y. (2020). Developing students’ action competence for a sustainable future: A review of educational research, Sustainability, 12(4), 1374. doi.org/10.3390/su12041374
[10] Sass W., Claes E., Boeve-de Pauw J., De Maeyer S., Schelfhout W., Van Petegem P., Isac M.M. (2022), Measuring professional action competence in education for sustainable development (PACesd), Environmental Education Research, 28/2, pp 260- 275. doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1976731
[11] Olsson D., Gericke N., Pauw J.B.D. (2022). The effectiveness of education for sustainable development revisited – a longitudinal study on secondary students’ action competence for sustainability, Environmental Education Research, 28/3, pp 405-429. doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2033170
[12] Isac M. M., Sass W., Pauw J. B. D., De Maeyer S., Schelfhout W., Van Petegem P., Claes E. (2022). Differences in teachers’ professional action competence in education for sustainable development: the importance of teacher Co-learning, Sustainability, 14(2), 767. doi.org/10.3390/su14020767
[13] Schroder S., Wiek A., Farny S., Luthardt P. (2023). Toward holistic corporate sustainability – Developing employees' action competence for sustainability in small and medium-sized enterprises through training, Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), pp 1650– 1669. doi.org/10.1002/bse.3210
[14] Mosely G., Wright N., Wrigley C. (2018). Facilitating design thinking: A comparison of design expertise, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 177-189. doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.004
conference
Proceedings of 23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023
23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023, 03 - 09 July, 2023
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
97-104
03 - 09 July, 2023
website
9280
sustainable development principles, project-based learning, rethinking