Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +



Title: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF FISH AND MEAT CANNERIES

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF FISH AND MEAT CANNERIES
Victorita Radulescu
10.5593/sgem2023/5.1
1314-2704
English
23
5.1
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
This paper analyses the environmental impact produced by fish and meat canneries. The TULCO SA factory in Tulcea County is presented as a case study. Located on the Danube banks, it has a guaranteed and permanent source of fish and meat; fish from the Danube and fish farmers and pork and beef meat from a nearby breeding complex. Some specific analyzes of the impact on wastewater, air, and soils are illustrated. Impact on wastewater is detailed for the production of canned fish and pork and cattle meat, at different manufacturing stages, starting from unloading, removing scales, section of cutting and cleaning, until washing and degreasing the cans in which the fish and meat will be packed. Some results obtained based on local measurements are presented. Wastewater is cleaned in a treatment plant. Depending on the water temperature and charge with organic matter, the minimum hydraulic retention time is estimated to ensure the water quality that will be discharged into the Danube. The impact on the air is determined by the plants that operate continuously 20 h/day. Emissions of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur are analyzed. The impact on the soil is estimated by analyzing the waste or different substances resulting from the cans manufacturing process that can infiltrate into the soil. Finally, an environmental impact diagram is presented, considering all these aspects so that the overall effect remains negligible for the environment.
[1] Hospido A., Vasquez M., et all, Environmental assessment of canned tuna manufacture with a life-cycle perspective, Journal Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 47, issue 1, pp. 56-72, 2006.
[2] Md S.I, Ramal A.M, Assessment of trace elements in canned fish and health risk appraisal, Journal Foods and Raw Materials, vol. 11, issue 1, pp. 43-56, 2023.
[3] Mata, M.E., Environmental challenge in the canning industry: the Portuguese case in the early twentieth century, J. Historical Social Research, vol. 35(4), pp. 351-372, 2010.
[4] Cristov R.O, Botelho C.M., et all, Fish canning industry wastewater treatment for water, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 87, 2015, pp. 603-612, 2015.
[5] Chen L., Zheng H., Shah V., Consuming to Conserve: A Multilevel Investigation of Sustainable Consumption, Sustainability, vol. 14(1), 2022.
[6] Urban wastewater treatment Updating EU rules, Briefing EU Legislation in Progress, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2023/739370/EPRS_BRI(2023)7 39370_EN.pdf, [last accessed March 21, 2023].
[7] Huang H., Zhang Z., Jiang F., Environmental effects of global value chain embedding in manufacturing industry in countries along the Belt and Road, Frontiers, Environmental Economics and Management, vol.10, 2022.
conference
Proceedings of 23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023
23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023, 03 - 09 July, 2023
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
123-130
03 - 09 July, 2023
website
9283
Air pollution, Environmental impact, Environmental protection, Soil pollution, Water quality