Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: GREEN COMPETITIVENESS AS A BUSINESS STRATEGY
GREEN COMPETITIVENESS AS A BUSINESS STRATEGY

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Jakub Chlopecky; Ondrej Grycz; Marian Piecha; Jan Pszczolka; Vaclav Zyder
10.5593/sgem2023/5.1/s20.17
10.5593/sgem2023/5.1
1314-2704
978-619-7603-60-6
English
23
5.1
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Ecology and Environmental Protection
Climate change and the deteriorating state of the environment pose a serious threat to the European Union and the entire world. The Green Deal for Europe sets a potential goal of achieving climate neutrality by 2050. This agreement aims to promote a green economy, create sustainable industry and transport, and reduce pollution. The main intention is to turn climate and environmental challenges into opportunities and ensure that the transition is fair and inclusive. The European Commission supports EU Member States in designing and implementing reforms that support the ecological transformation and contribute to achieving the objectives of the Green Deal for Europe. The Commission also assists in designing the necessary procedures in central and local administrations and creates the coordination structures necessary for the implementation of environmental policies. The aim of this article was to propose possible strategies to use and support the competitiveness of companies in the Czech Republic in meeting the goals of the European Union. In order to increase competitiveness, it focuses on strengthening small and medium-sized enterprises, reducing sector market barriers, facilitating foreign investment and trade, supporting research and innovation, better managing public-private partnerships and optimizing state-owned enterprises. With this contribution, the authors are trying to contribute to the achievement of the goals of the European Union and at the same time support the competitiveness of companies in the Czech Republic.
[1] Antweiler, W., B. R. Copeland, and M. S. Taylor. 2001. Is free trade good for the environment? American Economic Review, 91(4): 877-908.
[2] Brunel, C. and A. Levinson. 2013. Measuring Environmental Regulatory Stringency. Trade and environment working papers, OECD.
[3] Ederington, J. & Minier, J. (2003). Is environmental policy a secondary trade barrier? an empirical analysis. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’economique, 36(1), 137– 154.
[4] Ederington, J., A. Levinson, and J. Minier. 2005. Footloose and pollution-free. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87: 92-99.
[5] Gollop, F., M. and M. J. Roberts.1983. Environmental regulations and productivity growth: the case of fossil-fuelled electric power generation. Journal of Political Economy, 9: 654-674.
[6] Greenstone, M. 2002. The impacts of environmental regulations on industrial activity: Evidence from the 1970 and 1977 Clean Air Act amendments and the census of manufactures. Journal of Political Economy, 110(6): 1175-1219.
[7] Grossman, G., M. and A. B. Krueger. 1995. Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2): 353-377.
[8] Chlopecky, J., Moravec, L., Danel, R., Ameir, O. External analysis for the purpose of strategic decision-making of heating company (2019) SMSIS 2019 - Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Strategic Management and Its Support by Information Systems, pp. 33-41
[9] Keller, W., and A. Levinson. 2002. Pollution abatement costs and foreign direct investment inflows to US. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(4): 691-703.
[10] Kozel, R., Vilamova, S., Baranek, P., Friedrich, V., Hajduova, Z., Behun, M. Optimizing of the balanced scorecard method for management of mining companies with the use of factor analysis (2017) Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 22 (4), pp. 439-447.
[11] Levinson, A. 1996. Environmental regulations and manufacturers’ location choices: Evidence from the census of manufactures. Journal of Public Economics, 62(1): 5–29.
[12] Levinson, A. and M. Taylor. 2008. Unmasking the pollution haven effect. International. Economic Review, 49(1): 223-254.
[13] Lukac, J., Mihalcova, B., Manova, E., Kozel, R., Vilamova, S., Culkova, K. The position of the Visegrad countries by clustering methods based on indicator environmental performance index (2020) Ekologia Bratislava, 39 (1), pp. 16-26.
[14] Pawliczek, A., Chlopecky, J., Oberreiterova, O., Moravec, L. Havirov: “The City of Green” and Its Fourth Sector Sustainability Activities. One Case Study from the Czech Republic (2021) Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics, pp. 171-211.
[15] Sato, M. and Dechezlepretre, A. 2015. Asymmetric industrial energy prices and international trade. Energy Economics, 1(52):S130-141.
[16] Vilamova, S., Janovska, K., Kozel, R., Besta, P., Stoch, M., Cech, M. Selected aspects of marketing management of metallurgical companies (2013) METAL 2013 - 22nd International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials, Conference Proceedings, pp. 2043- 2049.
[17] Yamazaki, A., 2015. Jobs and Climate Policy: Evidence from British Columbia’s RevenueNeutral. Working paper
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2023/5.1/s20.17
Download PDF
Proceedings of 23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023
23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023, 03 - 09 July, 2023
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Turkish Acad Sci.
139-144
03 - 09 July, 2023
website
9285
Strategy, green energy, environment, investment, invented