Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF MANAGING SECONDARY WASTE FROM INCINERATION PLANT IN CONCRETE - CARBON FOOTPRINT AND ABIOTIC DEPLETION.
ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF MANAGING SECONDARY WASTE FROM INCINERATION PLANT IN CONCRETE - CARBON FOOTPRINT AND ABIOTIC DEPLETION.

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Nikolina Poranek; Beata Lazniewska Piekarczyk; Krzysztof Pikon
10.5593/sgem2023V/6.2/s26.62
10.5593/sgem2023v/6.2
1314-2704
978-619-7603-66-8
English
23
6.2
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Green Buildings Technologies and Materials
The use of secondary waste from municipal solid waste incineration plant in concrete has been studied for its potential to reduce the carbon footprint and abiotic depletion associated with traditional concrete production. Fly ash is a hazardous waste and it can be used as a substitute for cement in the production of concrete. Bottom ash can be used as a substitute for light natural aggregate, which was previously soaked in water for internal treatment of concrete. The composition of concrete includes: CEM I 42.5R, CSA, basalt, sand, zeolite, additives and admixtures. Studies have shown that concrete with secondary waste can decrease CO2 emissions and abiotic depletion compared to traditional concrete. In the article 4 scenarios are introduced (1 - concrete with fly ash, 2 - concrete with bottom ash, 3 - concrete with both secondary waste, 4 - reference concrete). The tests were performed for 1 kg of concrete, in the cradle-to-gate range, excluding transport. 4th scenario has the biggest carbon footprint and abiotic depletion influence. The least impact on environmental has 3rd scenario. Closing the loop by managing secondary waste in concrete fits into Circular Economy and Sustainable Development Goals, especially in SDG 12 – Responsible Consumption and Production and SDG13 – Climate Action.
[1] H. Birgisdottir, G. Bhander, M. Z. Hauschild, and T. H. Christensen, “Life cycleassessment of disposal of residues from municipal solid waste incineration:Recycling of bottom ash in road construction or landfilling in Denmark evaluatedin the ROAD-RES model,” Waste Management, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. S75–S84, 2007,doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.016.
[2] “The EU Green Deal – a roadmap to sustainable economies.” Accessed: Aug. 20,2021.[Online]. Available: https://www.switchtogreen.eu/the-eu-green-deal-promoting-a-green-notable-circular-economy/?fbclid=IwAR3Qjwk5f6D-OQGlSniG0iZSE8uACoVsI4fkEeTs6RsH38GCG-FcN6nAZdE
[3] A. Wajda, “Management of wastes from energy industry in the frame of circulareconomy on the example of microspheres,” International MultidisciplinaryScientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management,SGEM, vol. 18, no. 4.3, pp. 71–78, 2018, doi: 10.5593/SGEM2018V/4.3/S05.009.
[4] M. Kajda-Szczesniak, T. Jaworski, and A. Wajda, “Theoretical and experimentalmodel of the combustion process in a layer on the grate of the waste thermaltreatment installation,” International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferenceSurveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, vol. 19, no. 5.2,pp. 759–766, 2019, doi: 10.5593/SGEM2019/5.2/S20.095.
[5] “Deloitte. Raport: Closed loop - open opportunities.” Accessed: Nov. 20, 2021.[Online]. Available: https://www2.deloitte.com/pl/pl/pages/zarzadzania-procesami-i-strategiczne/articles/innowacje/raport-zamkniety-obieg-otwarte-mozliwosci.html
[6] “Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy.” Accessed: Sep.19, 2021.[Online]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1453384154337&uri=CELEX:52015DC0614
[7] N. Poranek, B. Lazniewska-Piekarczyk, A. Czajkowski, and K. Pikon,“Possibilities of Management of Fly Ash from Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Plant in Building Industry in the Circular Economy,” IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng,vol. 1203, no. 3, p. 032087, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1203/3/032087.
[8] N. Poranek, B. Lazniewska-Piekarczyk, A. Czajkowski, and K. Pikon, “CircularEconomy for Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Bottom Ash (MSWIBA)Management in Mortars with CSA and CEM I, MSWIBA Glassy Phase, andDTG,” Energies 2022, Vol. 15, Page 135, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 135, Dec. 2021, doi:10.3390/EN15010135.
[9] A. C. J. Franze, “Social and environmental LCA of an ecolabeled notebook |Semantic Scholar.” Accessed: Oct. 21, 2022.[Online]. Available:https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Social-and-environmental-LCA-of-an-ecolabeled-Franze-Ciroth/b6e6fdeeb076550ad6ea73518c352f964873145e
[10] A. Czajkowski et al., “Global Water Crisis: Concept of a New Interactive ShowerPanel Based on IoT and Cloud Computing for Rational Water Consumption,”Applied Sciences 2021, Vol. 11, Page 4081, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 4081, Apr. 2021, doi:10.3390/APP11094081.
[11] P. Lehner, M. Hornakova, J. Pizon, and J. Golaszewski, “Effect of ChemicalAdmixtures on Mechanical and Degradation Properties of Metallurgical SludgeWaste Concrete,” Materials 2022, Vol. 15, Page 8287, vol. 15, no. 23, p. 8287,Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3390/MA15238287.
[12] J. Pizon, J. Golaszewski, M. Alwaeli, and P. Szwan, “Properties of Concrete withRecycled Concrete Aggregate Containing Metallurgical Sludge Waste,” Materials2020, Vol. 13, Page 1448, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 1448, Mar. 2020, doi:10.3390/MA13061448.
[13] A. Czajkowski, A. Wajda, N. Poranek, S. Bhadoria, and L. Remiorz, “Predictionof the Market of End-of-Life Photovoltaic Panels in the Context of Common EUManagement System,” Energies 2023, Vol. 16, Page 284, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 284,Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3390/EN16010284.
[14] B. Soust-verdaguer et al., “Review of visualising LCA results in the design processof buildings,” vol. 190, no. August 2020, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107530.
[15] J. Turk, Z. Cotic, A. Mladenovic, and A. Sajna, “Environmental evaluation ofgreen concretes versus conventional concrete by means of LCA,” WasteManagement, vol. 45, pp. 194–205, Nov. 2015, doi:10.1016/J.WASMAN.2015.06.035.
[16] A. E. Schwarz, T. N. Ligthart, D. Godoi Bizarro, P. De Wild, B. Vreugdenhil, andT. Van Harmelen, “Plastic recycling in a circular economy; determiningenvironmental performance through an LCA matrix model approach”, doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.020.
[17] C. Lausselet, K. M. Lund, and H. Bratteb, “LCA and scenario analysis of a Norwegiannet-zero GHG emission neighbourhood : The importance of mobility and surplusenergy from PV technologies,” vol. 189, no. June 2020, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107528.
[18] K. Janusz-Szymanska, K. Grzywnowicz, G. Wiciak, and L. Remiorz, “Reduction ofcarbon footprint from spark ignition power facilities by the dual approach,” Archivesof Thermodynamics, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 171–192, 2021, doi:10.24425/ATHER.2021.137559.
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2023V/6.2/s26.62
Download PDF
Proceedings of 23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023
23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023, 28-30 November, 2023
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference-SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Russian Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Russian Acad Arts; Turkish Acad Sci.
501-506
28-30 November, 2023
website
9635
Concrete, Life Cycle Assessment, Circular Economy, fly ash, bottom ash, carbon footprint, abiotic depletion