Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: CARBON FOOTPRINT REDUCTION ON MANUFACTURING SMES FROM DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES
CARBON FOOTPRINT REDUCTION ON MANUFACTURING SMES FROM DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Agostinho da Silva; Antonio Cardoso
10.5593/sgem2023V/6.2/s26.65
10.5593/sgem2023v/6.2
1314-2704
978-619-7603-66-8
English
23
6.2
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Green Buildings Technologies and Materials
Europe must avoid losing manufacturing SMEs. However, presenting distinct maturity levels, these companies have a hard time fulfilling the necessary ecological sustainability level. Controversially, despite the intense debate about digital technologies, there is still a need for knowledge in the industrial world about the impact of these technologies to make manufacturing SMEs environmentally friendly. According to data made available by Stone Portuguese Federation, in 2019, the Portuguese Ornamental Stone sector (OS.Pt): (i) exported to 116 countries; (ii) ranked 9th in the World International Stone Trade; (iii); was the second country in the world in international trade per capita; (iv) exports covered imports by 660%; (v) 45% of exports were to countries outside Europe and (vi) had a total turnover of EUR1,230 million. Mainly comprised of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), the OS.Pt sector is relevant for the Portuguese Economy, representing over 16,600 direct jobs, and is one of the main generators of private employment in inland regions has registered an average annual growth rate in turnover of 5.13% over the last ten years and has generated around 500 new jobs from 2016. By using the Portuguese stone sector case study, considering the investment to improve the operations towards digital, a framework was designed and used in five groups of forty stone manufacturing SMEs, each representing a digital level. Through a quantitative methodology based on five years after the investment, depending on the technology used and level of investment in digital technologies, it was found a potential reduction of CO2 emissions between 10.7% and 35.1%.
[1] L. Di Bella, A. Katsinis, J. Laguera-Gonzalez, L. Odenthal, M. Hell, and B. Lozar,“Annual Report on European SMEs 2022/2023,” 2023.
[2] D. Radicic, G. Pugh, and D. Douglas, “Promoting cooperation in innovationecosystems: evidence from European traditional manufacturing SMEs,” SmallBus. Econ., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 257–283, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11187-018-0088-3.
[3] L. Cozzi, “CO2 Emissions in 2022,” 2023. doi: 10.1787/12ad1e1a-en.
[4] J. Yan, Q. Lu, J. Tang, L. Chen, J. Hong, and T. Broyd, “Digital Tools forRevealing and Reducing Carbon Footprint in Infrastructure, Building, and CityScopes,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 1097, Jul. 2022, doi:10.3390/buildings12081097.
[5] C. Giulia, “Building Resilient Manufacturing and AEC Companies,” 2022.
[6] M. Hauschild, J. Jeswiet, and L. Alting, “From Life Cycle Assessment toSustainable Production: Status and Perspectives,” CIRP Ann., vol. 54, no. 2, pp.1–21, 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60017-1.
[7] C. Bai, P. Dallasega, G. Orzes, and J. Sarkis, “Industry 4.0 technologiesassessment: A sustainability perspective,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 229, p. 107776,2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107776.
[8] HM Government, “Digital Built Britain Level 3 Building Information Modelling -Strategic Plan,” 2015.[Online]. Available: http://digital-built-britain.com/DigitalBuiltBritainLevel3BuildingInformationModellingStrategicPlan.pdf.
[9] J. Matthews, P. E. D. Love, S. Heinemann, R. Chandler, C. Rumsey, and O.Olatunj, “Real time progress management: Re-engineering processes for cloud-based BIM in construction,” Autom. Constr., vol. 58, pp. 38–47, 2015, doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2015.07.004.
[10] A. Silva, J. Silva, and I. Almeida, “The role of digital technologies in theinnovation of collaborative networks : the case of the ornamental stones inPortugal,” 20th Cambridge Int. Manuf. Symp., no. September, 2016.
[11] I. Almeida and A. Silva, “The circularity endeavour in the Ornamental Stonesector,” in Reconfiguring global supply chains in the face of continued disruption:towards new design rules and capabilities, 2022.
[12] X. Ye, Y. Lu, and S. Manoharan, “Automated conversion of engineering rules:Towards flexible manufacturing collaboration,” Results Eng., vol. 16, no.September, p. 100680, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100680.
[13] C. Faller and D. Feldmuller, “Industry 4.0 Learning Factory for regional SMEs,”Procedia CIRP, vol. 32, no. Clf, pp. 88–91, 2015, doi:10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.117.
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2023V/6.2/s26.65
Download PDF
Proceedings of 23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023
23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023, 28-30 November, 2023
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference-SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Russian Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Russian Acad Arts; Turkish Acad Sci.
523-529
28-30 November, 2023
website
9638
Digital technologies, Decarbonization, Manufacturing SMEs, Ecological Footprint, Stone Industry