SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

TWITTER AS A SOURCE OF BIG SPATIAL DATA

Kocich, David, Horak, Jiri

First published: 2016-06-28https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2016/b21/s08.116View metrics

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Citations
  • CrossRef - Citation Indexes: 1
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 10

Publication details

Title
TWITTER AS A SOURCE OF BIG SPATIAL DATA
Authors
Kocich, David, Horak, Jiri
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2016, Informatics, Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing
Publisher
Stef92 Technology
Year
2016
Pages
921-928
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7105-58-2
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
References20
  1. LEE, K., AGRAWAL, A. and CHOUDHARY, A., 2013, Real -time Disease Surveillance Using Twitter Data: Demonstration on Flu and Cancer. In : Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, NY, USA : ACM. 2013. p. 1474 –1477. KDD ’13. ISBN 978 -1- 4503-2174-7.

  2. HAWELKA, B., SITKO, I., BEINAT, E., SOBOLEVSKY, S., KAZAKOPOULOS, P. and RATTI, C., 2014, Geo -located Twitter as proxy for global mobility patterns. Cartography and Geographic Information Science. 2014. Vol. 41, no. 3, p. 260 –271. DOI: 10.1080/15230406.2014.890072.

  3. LIN, P. and HUANG, P., 2013, A study of effective features for detecting long - surviving Twitter spam accounts. In : 2013 15th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT). January 2013. p. 841–846.

  4. ANDERSON, K. M., SCHRAM, A., ALZABARAH, A. and PALEN, L., 2013, Architectural Implications of Social Media Analytics in Support of Crisis Informatics Research. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 2013. Vol. 36, no. 3, p. 13–20.

  5. WANG, Y., CALLAN, J. and ZHENG, B., 2015, Should We Use the Sample Analyzing Datasets Sampled from Twitter’s Stream API. ACM Trans. Web. June 2015. Vol. 9, no. 3, p. 13:1–13:23. DOI: 10.1145/2746366.

  6. MORSTATTER, F., PFEFFER, J., LIU, H. and CARLEY, K. M., 2013, Is the Sample Good Enough Comparing Data from Twitter’s Streaming API with Twitter’s Firehose. 21 June 2013. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.5204

  7. MAKICE, K., 2009, Twitter API: Up and running: Learn how to build applications with the Twitter API. O’Reilly Media, Inc.

  8. TWITTER, INC., 2015, Twitter Developers. [online]. [Accessed 22 December 2015]. Available from: https://dev.twitter.com/

  9. HORÁK, J., BELAJ, P., IVAN, I. , NEMEC, P. , ARDIELLI, J. and RŮŽIČKA, J.. 2011, Geoparsing of Czech RSS news and evaluation of its spatial distribution . 2011. Studies in Computational Intelligence 381, pp. 353-367.

  10. PIYUSH, K., 2015. 80% reduction in tweets with coordinate data - Streaming APIs - Twitter Developer [online]. 2015. [Accessed 17 January 2016]. Available from: https://twittercommunity.com/users/pi_kumar/activity 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2016 www.sgem.org

  11. LEE, K., AGRAWAL, A. and CHOUDHARY, A., 2013, Real -time Disease Surveillance Using Twitter Data: Demonstration on Flu and Cancer. In : Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, NY, USA : ACM. 2013. p. 1474 –1477. KDD ’13. ISBN 978 -1- 4503-2174-7.

  12. HAWELKA, B., SITKO, I., BEINAT, E., SOBOLEVSKY, S., KAZAKOPOULOS, P. and RATTI, C., 2014, Geo -located Twitter as proxy for global mobility patterns. Cartography and Geographic Information Science. 2014. Vol. 41, no. 3, p. 260 –271. DOI: 10.1080/15230406.2014.890072.

  13. LIN, P. and HUANG, P., 2013, A study of effective features for detecting long - surviving Twitter spam accounts. In : 2013 15th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT). January 2013. p. 841–846.

  14. ANDERSON, K. M., SCHRAM, A., ALZABARAH, A. and PALEN, L., 2013, Architectural Implications of Social Media Analytics in Support of Crisis Informatics Research. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 2013. Vol. 36, no. 3, p. 13–20.

  15. WANG, Y., CALLAN, J. and ZHENG, B., 2015, Should We Use the Sample Analyzing Datasets Sampled from Twitter’s Stream API. ACM Trans. Web. June 2015. Vol. 9, no. 3, p. 13:1–13:23. DOI: 10.1145/2746366.

  16. MORSTATTER, F., PFEFFER, J., LIU, H. and CARLEY, K. M., 2013, Is the Sample Good Enough Comparing Data from Twitter’s Streaming API with Twitter’s Firehose. 21 June 2013. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.5204

  17. MAKICE, K., 2009, Twitter API: Up and running: Learn how to build applications with the Twitter API. O’Reilly Media, Inc.

  18. TWITTER, INC., 2015, Twitter Developers. [online]. [Accessed 22 December 2015]. Available from: https://dev.twitter.com/

  19. HORÁK, J., BELAJ, P., IVAN, I. , NEMEC, P. , ARDIELLI, J. and RŮŽIČKA, J.. 2011, Geoparsing of Czech RSS news and evaluation of its spatial distribution . 2011. Studies in Computational Intelligence 381, pp. 353-367.

  20. PIYUSH, K., 2015. 80% reduction in tweets with coordinate data - Streaming APIs - Twitter Developer [online]. 2015. [Accessed 17 January 2016]. Available from: https://twittercommunity.com/users/pi_kumar/activity 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2016 www.sgem.org

Citing literature

Number of times cited according to Crossref: 1

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list