Scholarly record
LOCAL GEOMAGNETIC ACTIVITY RECORDED ON THE BULGARIAN TERRITORY FOR THE SOLAR CYCLE 24
Abstract
Records of the magnetic variations are different at every observatory. They depend mainly on the latitude of the observatory and the local time. To give a quantitative measure of the amount of magnetic disturbance at any time, we need to rely on magnetic indices. Usually, local K-index is preferred as indicator of the geomagnetic activity in a specific area. Each observatory assigns a digit ranging from 0 to 9 to both H and D, for every three-hour interval starting at midnight, universal time (UT). Recently, in December 2019 finished the last Solar Cycle - one of the main periodic variations of the solar activity. This inspired the topic of the present research to investigate the dependence of the local magnetic activity recorded at Panagjurishte (PAG) observatory and the records of the sunspot numbers during the 11 years long cycle. PAG observatory is situated at middle latitude and does not experience the polar electrojet which causes intense 'negative bays' or polar magnetic substorms in the high latitudes and the terrestrial ring current centered at the equatorial plane and responsible also for global decreases in the Earth's surface magnetic field. The Solar Cycle 24 was announced as one of the weakest in the last century of observations. Similar is the statistics of the recorded geomagnetic event at the PAG observatory. Plot of the days with registered geomagnetic storms for the whole 11-year period clearly shows two maxima of the annual numbers - one in 2012 and another (larger) in 2015 when 67 days have had K-index ?5. In June that year happened also the largest event with K-index=8. Examining the monthly distribution of magnetic storms, it was found that the periods in which there are largest recorded events are also two: February - March and September- October with more than 30 stormy days in total. As a conclusion it was found the for Solar Cycle 24, 75% of the time has had calm geomagnetic condition, 16 % has been disturbed and only in 9% of the time (less than a year), the Sun has caused geomagnetic storms.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References13
Schwabe H., "Sonnen beobachtungen im Jahre 1843" Astronomische Nachrichten (in German). 21: 233–236. 1843
Solomon SC, Woods TN, Didkovsky LV, Emmert JT, Qian L. Anomalously low solar extreme-ultraviolet irradiance and thermospheric density during solar minimum. Geophys Res Lett 37: L16103, 2010 .
Bartels, J., N.H. Heck and H.F. Johnston, The three-hour-range index measuring geomagnetic activity, Terr. Magn. Atmos. Elec., 44, 455, 1939.
Moussas X, Polygiannakis J. M., Preka-Papadema P., Exarhos G., Solar cycles: A tutorial, Advances in Space Research, Volume 35, Issue 5, 2005, p.725-738,
Wolf R, Mitteilungen ?ber die Sonnenflecken, I. Astron. Mitteil. Eidgn. Sternw. Z?rich 1, p. 3–13,1856
Clette, F., Svalgaard, L., Vaquero, J.M. et al. Revisiting the Sunspot Number. Space Sci Rev 186, 35–103, 2014.
Komitov B., Kaftan V., The sunspot cycle no. 24 in relation to long term solar activity variation, Journal of Advanced Research, Vol 4/ Issue 3, p. 279-282, 2013
Pesnell W. Dean, Lessons learned from predictions of Solar Cycle 24, J. Space Weather Space Clim., 10, 2020, 60
Russell C.T., Mewaldt R.A., Luhmann J.G., Mason G.M., von Rosenvinge T.T., et al., The very unusual interplanetary coronal mass ejection of 2012 July 23: A blast wave mediated by solar energetic particles. Astrophys J. 770: 38. 2013.
Sun X, Bobra MG, Hoeksema JT, Liu Y, Li Y, Shen C, Couvidat S, Norton AA, Fisher GH. Why is the great solar active region 12192 flare-rich but CME-poor? Astrophys J Lett 804: L28, 2015..
Chian A.CL. et al. (eds) Advances in Space Environment Research. Springer, Dordrecht, 2003
Sucksdorff, C., Pirjola, R. and H?kkinen, L., Computer production of K-values based on linear elimination, Geophysical Transactions, 36, p. 333-345 1991.
Trifonova P. and Metodiev M., Annual report of the observed geomagnetic activity in Panagyurishte observatory, Bulgarian Geophys. Journal, vol. 38, p. 51-78, 2012
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.

