Scholarly record
GEOMECHANICAL PARAMETRICIZATION OF ROCK MASSIF FOR SELECTION AND SUBSTANTIATION OF TECHNOLOGY OF UNDERGROUND WORKS
Abstract
Systematization of ore deposits is carried out according to geomechanical conditions on the basis of tectonic features. In total, more than 120 underground mines have been analyzed. Four models of the geo-environment are distinguished. They make it possible to differentially describe the nature of the change in the stress state with increasing depth. The efficiency and reliability of the use of typical geomechanical conditions of rock massifs for determining the field of application of geotechnologies is shown. Correlation links between geomechanical models of the geo-environment and development systems of ore deposits are established, taking into account the maximum depth of their development as a criterial condition for the development of the rating classification of geotechnologies. The proposed geomechanical models of the geo-environment and their corresponding development systems greatly expand the possibilities for assessing the mining situation in the ore fields and contribute to a more correct choice of the method for mining of raw materials. The systematization of rock massifs makes it possible to classify existing and explored deposits as a type and characteristics of tectonic structures to a certain class of geomechanical working conditions, taking into account the depth and, based on the initial data obtained, to predict the magnitude of stresses at the design and construction stage, to substantiate development systems and their parameters.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References9
Leontev A.V. analysis of natural stresses according to the measurement results in mines on the territory of Northern Eurasia // Journal of Mining Science. –2001. – Т. 37. – № 1. – P. 28-37.
Neverov S.A. Types of orebodies on the basis of the occurrence depth and stress state. Part I: Modern concept of the stress state versus depth // Journal of Mining Science. – 2012. – Т. 48. – № 2. – P. 249-259.
Freidin A. M., Neverov S. A., Neverov A. A., Konurin A. I. Geomechanical assessment of geotechnology at a project stage of underground ore mining // Mining Journal. – 2016. – №2. – DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2016.02.08
Hast N. The state of stress in the upper part of the Earth’s cristas determined by measurements of absolute rock stress // Naturwissenschaften. – 1974. – № 11.
Gey N.C. The state of stress in large dyke on K.R.P.M. Buksburg, South Africa. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 1980. vol. 2.
Brown E., Hoek E. Trends in relationships between measured in situ stresses and depth // International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. Geomechanics Abstracts. – 1978. – № 4.
Brudy M., Zoback M.D., Fuchs K., Rummel F., Baumgaertner J. Estimation of the complete stress tensor to 8 km depth in the KTB scientific drill holes: Implications for crustal strength // J. Geophys. Res. – 1997. – 102, № B8. – P. 18453 – 18475.
Tectonic stresses in the Alpine-Wediterranean region // Rock Mechanics. 1980. – № 9.
Arjang B. Database on Canadian in situ ground stresses. CANMET Mining and Mineral Sciences Laboratories / Division Report MMSL. 2001.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
