SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

APPLICATION OF MULTI ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING METHODS TO RESOURCES ALLOCATION PROBLEMS

Erik Mostert, Majid Sheikhmohammady

First published: 2012-06-18https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2012/s22.v4004View metrics

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 8

Publication details

Title
APPLICATION OF MULTI ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING METHODS TO RESOURCES ALLOCATION PROBLEMS
Authors
Erik Mostert, Majid Sheikhmohammady
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; SGEM2012 12th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference
Publisher
Stef92 Technology
Year
2012
Pages
861 - 868 pp
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
Not available yet
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
References36
  1. C. Romero and T. Rehman, “Natural resource management and the use of multiple criteria decision-making techniques: A review,” European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 61-89, 1987.

  2. S. Hajkowicz and K. Collins, “A Review of Multiple Criteria Analysis for Water Resource Planning and Management,” Water Resources Management, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1553-1566, Nov. 2006.

  3. G. Herath and T. Prato, Using multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management. Burlington, USA: Ashgate Publication, 2006, p. 239.

  4. G. a. Mendoza and H. Martins, “Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modeling paradigms,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 230, no. 1–3, pp. 1-22, Jul. 2006.

  5. M. Haghayeghi, “The Coming of Conflict to the Caspian Sea,” Problems of Post- Communism, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 32-41, 2003.

  6. “Oil and gas infrastructure in the Caspian Sea and Black Sea Regions 2001,” 2001. [Online]. Available: http://www.zonu.com/fullsize-en/2009-09-18- 7242/Oil-and-gas-infrastructure-in-the-Caspian-Sea-and-Black-Sea-Regions- 2001.html.

  7. M. Sheikhmohammady, D. M. Kilgour, and K. W. Hipel, “Modeling the Caspian Sea Negotiations,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 149-168, Aug. 2010.

  8. R. Smolíková and M. P. Wachowiak, “Aggregation operators for selection problems,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 23-34, Oct. 2002. SGEM2012 - DOI: 10.5593/sgem2012 www.sgem.org 12th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2012

  9. R. R. Yager, “On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi criteria decision making,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 183-190, 1988.

  10. R. R. Yager, “Families of OWA operators,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 125-148, Oct. 1993.

  11. R. R. Yager, “Aggregation operators and fuzzy systems modeling,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 129-145, Oct. 1994.

  12. R. R. Yager, “Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 49-73, Dec. 1996.

  13. L. Zadeh, “A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 149-184, 1983.

  14. J. Malczewski and C. Rinner, “Exploring multi criteria decision strategies in GIS with linguistic quantifiers: A case study of residential quality evaluation,” Journal of Geographical Systems, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 249-268, Jun. 2005.

  15. S. E. Bodily, Modern decision making : a guide to modeling with decision support systems. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1985, p. 300.

  16. B. A. Mellers and S.-jie Chang, “Representations of Risk Judgments,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 167- 184, Feb. 1994.

  17. T. Tanino, “Fuzzy preference relations in group decision making,” in Non- conventional preference relations in decision making, J. Kacprzyk and M. Roubens, Eds. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1988, p. 155.

  18. F. Chiclana, F. Herrera, and E. Herre ra-Viedma, “Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 33-48, Jul. 1998. SGEM2012 - DOI: 10.5593/sgem2012 www.sgem.org

  19. C. Romero and T. Rehman, “Natural resource management and the use of multiple criteria decision-making techniques: A review,” European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 61-89, 1987.

  20. S. Hajkowicz and K. Collins, “A Review of Multiple Criteria Analysis for Water Resource Planning and Management,” Water Resources Management, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1553-1566, Nov. 2006.

  21. G. Herath and T. Prato, Using multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management. Burlington, USA: Ashgate Publication, 2006, p. 239.

  22. G. a. Mendoza and H. Martins, “Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modeling paradigms,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 230, no. 1–3, pp. 1-22, Jul. 2006.

  23. M. Haghayeghi, “The Coming of Conflict to the Caspian Sea,” Problems of Post- Communism, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 32-41, 2003.

  24. “Oil and gas infrastructure in the Caspian Sea and Black Sea Regions 2001,” 2001. [Online]. Available: http://www.zonu.com/fullsize-en/2009-09-18- 7242/Oil-and-gas-infrastructure-in-the-Caspian-Sea-and-Black-Sea-Regions- 2001.html.

  25. M. Sheikhmohammady, D. M. Kilgour, and K. W. Hipel, “Modeling the Caspian Sea Negotiations,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 149-168, Aug. 2010.

  26. R. Smolíková and M. P. Wachowiak, “Aggregation operators for selection problems,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 23-34, Oct. 2002. SGEM2012 - DOI: 10.5593/sgem2012 www.sgem.org 12th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2012

  27. R. R. Yager, “On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi criteria decision making,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 183-190, 1988.

  28. R. R. Yager, “Families of OWA operators,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 125-148, Oct. 1993.

  29. R. R. Yager, “Aggregation operators and fuzzy systems modeling,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 129-145, Oct. 1994.

  30. R. R. Yager, “Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 49-73, Dec. 1996.

  31. L. Zadeh, “A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 149-184, 1983.

  32. J. Malczewski and C. Rinner, “Exploring multi criteria decision strategies in GIS with linguistic quantifiers: A case study of residential quality evaluation,” Journal of Geographical Systems, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 249-268, Jun. 2005.

  33. S. E. Bodily, Modern decision making : a guide to modeling with decision support systems. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1985, p. 300.

  34. B. A. Mellers and S.-jie Chang, “Representations of Risk Judgments,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 167- 184, Feb. 1994.

  35. T. Tanino, “Fuzzy preference relations in group decision making,” in Non- conventional preference relations in decision making, J. Kacprzyk and M. Roubens, Eds. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1988, p. 155.

  36. F. Chiclana, F. Herrera, and E. Herre ra-Viedma, “Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 33-48, Jul. 1998. SGEM2012 - DOI: 10.5593/sgem2012 www.sgem.org

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list