SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

ASSESSMENT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF BIOENERGY IN LATVIA

oec.

First published: 2015-06-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2015/b53/s21.013View metrics

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 10

Publication details

Title
ASSESSMENT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF BIOENERGY IN LATVIA
Authors
oec.
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2015, ECOLOGY, ECONOMICS, EDUCATION AND LEGISLATION
Publisher
Stef92 Technology
Year
2015
Pages
101-108
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7105-41-4
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
References30
  1. European Commission. A policy framework for climate and energy in the period from 2020 to 2030. Communication from the Commission to the European International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferences SGEM2015 Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (COM/2014/015 final), 2014. http://e ur- lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/ uri=CELEX:52014DC0015

  2. Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia (CSB). Database. http://www.csb.gov.lv/en/dati/statistics-database-30501.html

  3. Eurostat. Database. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database

  4. Melece, L., Lakovskis, P. Land Use Change and Bioenergy in Latvia. Economic Science for Rural Development, vol. 34, pp. 180-189 , 2014.

  5. Everaars, J., Frank, K., Huth, A. Species ecology and the impacts of bioenergy crops: An assessment approach with four example farmland bird species, GCB Bioenergy, vol. 6/issue 3, pp. 252–264, 2014.

  6. Auniņš, A. Latvijas parasto putnu skaita pārmaiņas pēdējos septiņos gados , Putni dabā, 2013/1, pp. 10-13, 2013.

  7. Fargione, J., Cooper, T.R., Flaspohler, D.J. et al. Bioenergy and Wildlife: Threats and Opportunities for Grassland Conservation, BioScience, vol.59/issue 9, pp. 767-777, 2009.

  8. Henry, M., Beguin, M., Requier, F. et al. Acommon pesticide decreases foraging success and survival in honey bees. Science, vol. 336, pp. 348-350, 2012.

  9. Kigozi, R., Aboyade, A., Muzenda, E. Biogas Production Using the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste as Feedstock, International Journal of Research in Chemical, Metallurgical and Civil Engineering, vol. 1/issue 1, pp. 107-114 ,

  10. Melece L., Krieviņa A. Bioenergy: Impact of Rural Development Measures in Latvia, Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, vol. 36/No 2, 3, pp. 578-587, 2014.

  11. Goetzl, A. Developments in the Global Trade of Wood Pellets, Washington D.C.: U.S. International Trade Commission, 28 p., 2015.

  12. AEBIOM Bioenergy: A Local and Renewable Solution for Energy Security, Brussels: AEBIOM. 8 p., 2015.

  13. Baycheva, T., Inhaizer, H., Lier, M., Prins, K., Wolfslehner, B. Implementing Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management in Europe, European Forest Institute, 132 p. 2013

  14. European Commission. Renewable energy progress report. COM/2013/0175 final, 2013. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/ uri=CELEX:52013DC0175

  15. Pedroli, B., Elbersen, B., Frederiksen, P. et al. Is energy cropping in Europe compatible with biodiversity Opportunities and threats to biodiversity from land- based production of biomass for bioenergy purposes, Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 55, pp. 73-86, 2013. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org

  16. European Commission. A policy framework for climate and energy in the period from 2020 to 2030. Communication from the Commission to the European International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferences SGEM2015 Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (COM/2014/015 final), 2014. http://e ur- lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/ uri=CELEX:52014DC0015

  17. Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia (CSB). Database. http://www.csb.gov.lv/en/dati/statistics-database-30501.html

  18. Eurostat. Database. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database

  19. Melece, L., Lakovskis, P. Land Use Change and Bioenergy in Latvia. Economic Science for Rural Development, vol. 34, pp. 180-189 , 2014.

  20. Everaars, J., Frank, K., Huth, A. Species ecology and the impacts of bioenergy crops: An assessment approach with four example farmland bird species, GCB Bioenergy, vol. 6/issue 3, pp. 252–264, 2014.

  21. Auniņš, A. Latvijas parasto putnu skaita pārmaiņas pēdējos septiņos gados , Putni dabā, 2013/1, pp. 10-13, 2013.

  22. Fargione, J., Cooper, T.R., Flaspohler, D.J. et al. Bioenergy and Wildlife: Threats and Opportunities for Grassland Conservation, BioScience, vol.59/issue 9, pp. 767-777, 2009.

  23. Henry, M., Beguin, M., Requier, F. et al. Acommon pesticide decreases foraging success and survival in honey bees. Science, vol. 336, pp. 348-350, 2012.

  24. Kigozi, R., Aboyade, A., Muzenda, E. Biogas Production Using the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste as Feedstock, International Journal of Research in Chemical, Metallurgical and Civil Engineering, vol. 1/issue 1, pp. 107-114 ,

  25. Melece L., Krieviņa A. Bioenergy: Impact of Rural Development Measures in Latvia, Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, vol. 36/No 2, 3, pp. 578-587, 2014.

  26. Goetzl, A. Developments in the Global Trade of Wood Pellets, Washington D.C.: U.S. International Trade Commission, 28 p., 2015.

  27. AEBIOM Bioenergy: A Local and Renewable Solution for Energy Security, Brussels: AEBIOM. 8 p., 2015.

  28. Baycheva, T., Inhaizer, H., Lier, M., Prins, K., Wolfslehner, B. Implementing Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management in Europe, European Forest Institute, 132 p. 2013

  29. European Commission. Renewable energy progress report. COM/2013/0175 final, 2013. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/ uri=CELEX:52013DC0175

  30. Pedroli, B., Elbersen, B., Frederiksen, P. et al. Is energy cropping in Europe compatible with biodiversity Opportunities and threats to biodiversity from land- based production of biomass for bioenergy purposes, Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 55, pp. 73-86, 2013. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list