Scholarly record
FLOOD RISK GOVERNANCE AND COMMUNICATION DEVELOPMENT FOR COASTAL MUNICIPALITIES: INFORMATION AND EDUCATION, PARTICIPATION AND PRACTISE SELF-EXPERIENCE
Abstract
Climate change also increase different natural risk possibility - erosion and floods in coastal local municipalities in Latvia are becoming increasingly more important. The most significant flood risk factor, particularly in the climate change context, are wind surges, especially coinciding with ongoing sea level raise and, even, rapid and intence, rainfall, while the nation wide spread snowmelt flood risks are less impacting the coastal municipalities. Research-and-development study analyzed coastal risk governance and communication in two coastal municipalities in Latvia пїЅ Ventspils town and Salacgriva rural territory. The floods affected and also general householdпїЅs questionnaire surveys, complemented by structured in-depth interviews were performed. Both studies dealt in particular with still barely known risk communication as a specific field of communication, being multidisciplinary and complex. Analyzing risk communication developments, there have been applied and discussed the collaboration communication model, after its successful spreading at municipal level in Latvia during last decade. In order to provide successful environmental and development risks communication within a coastal municipality, it is necessary to collaboratively develop a set of four non-traditional communication instruments пїЅ information and education/training, participation and environment/health friendly and risk adapted behavior - among all of the parties and groups of interest involved, supported by the municipality and selectively focused on the relevant target groups. This mentioned collaboration communication model shall be introduced both into the planning process of whatever specific risk management and into the general planning process of the municipal environment and development, incl. spatial planning, as well as into the municipal normative and everyday process prescriptive action documentation, using appropriate communication tools and channels, taking into account the context of the situation and values of target groups. The research results suggest to use this model not only at the local, but also at the regional/national levels.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References12
Waagsaether, K., Ziervogel, G. Bridging the Communication Gap: An Exploration of the Climate Science–Water Management Interface. In W. Leal Filho (ed.), Climate Change and the Sustainable Use of Water Resources. pp 485-499, 2012
Hopkins, S., Bailly, D., Elmgren, R., Glegg, G., Sandberg, A., Støttrup, J. G. A Systems Approach Framework for the Transition to Sustainable Development. Ecology and Society, Vol. 17 (3), p. 39, 2012
Wardekker, J.A., de Jong, A., Knoop, J.M., van der Sluijs, J.P. (2010) Operationalising a resilience approach to adapting an urban delta to uncertain climate changes. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, vol. 77, 987–998p.
Blake, J. (1999). Overcoming the 'value-action gap' in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 4 (3), P. 257–278.
Ernsteins, R. Environmental Communication. Manual. University of Latvia, Riga, 2003. 87 p. (based on Ernšteins R. Environmental science education development (in Latvian). Monography, Publisher “Vide”, Riga, 1999, 342 p.)
Abkowitz, Mark D. (2002). Environmental Risk Communication: What Is It and How Can It Work? Nashville: Summit Proceedings, 15 p.
Boholm, A. (2009), Speaking of Risk: Matters of Context. Environmental Communication, Vol. 3, No. 3, p. 335-350.
Brulle R. From Environmental Campaigns to Public Dialog: Environmental Communication for Engagement, Environmental Communication, 4:1, 82-98, 2010,
Beierle, T. C., Cayford, J. (2002). Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions. Resources for the Future. 149 p.
Ernšteins, R. (2012). Development of municipal and social resilience understanding: stakeholder complementary training on coastal governance and communication, International environmental conference, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Varna, 2012, pp. 1007-1014.
Knolle, M., Grunenberg, H., Heinrichs, H. (2007). The informed society, action 2, final report, Lüneburg: Leuphana University, 41 p.
Godemann J, Michelsen G (eds) Sustainability communication: interdisciplinary perspectives and theoretical foundation. Springer, Berlin, 2011
Citing literature
Number of times cited according to Crossref: 1
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
