SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

SOIL EROSION AND FLOOD MITIGATION IN CZ AND UK - COMPARISON, DISCUSSION AND LESSON LEARNED

Miroslav Bauer

First published: 2019-06-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2019/3.2/s13.053View metrics

Abstract

Both the United Kingdom as well as Czech Republic have seen increased impacts due to flooding in recent years. Rural flooding is due to intense and heavy rainfall-runoff events. Runoff brings with it soil erosion and sediment transport, so called ?muddy floods,? which causes serious onsite and offsite damages in the landscape or even in settlement area and infrastructure. Long-term observation and measurement is crucial step for understanding of complexity of processes involved in the generation of muddy floods and a requirement for and further calibration and validation of predictive models. In addition, such flooding has a significant impact to the agricultural in both countries. There are differences in initial conditions but similarities in consequences, which leads to degradation of sources (soils) and costs in billions EUR each year. Both countries are investing in research and three complementary projects are highlighted here, as examples. The ?Quantifying the likely magnitude of nature-based flood mitigation effects across large catchments (Q-NFM)? project funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council is dealing with the question ?How much can natural measures reduce flooding at large scales??. The project includes direct measurement of landscape management effect to inform modelling, which can then be used to assess of flood protection and landscape management methods. Mitigation measures may have a synergistic effect and significantly lower the soil erosion and sediment transport, risk of drought or even floods. Modelling of these risks and scenarios of protection has been one of goals of two projects within Czech Rep. First is called Saxon-Czech flood risk management where soil erosion, sediment transport and scenarios of protection on 150km2 catchment is evaluated. Second is called ?Erosion losses - increased risk to the inhabitants and water quality? where large scale risk assessment of flash floods was carried out and 150,000 potential risk points identified over area of 79,000 km2.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
SOIL EROSION AND FLOOD MITIGATION IN CZ AND UK - COMPARISON, DISCUSSION AND LESSON LEARNED
Authors
Miroslav Bauer
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2019, Water Resources. Forest, Marine and Ocean Ecosystems
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2019
Pages
403-410
SWS Citekey
Bauer201913403410
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7408-82-9
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References15
  1. Toy TJ, Foster GR, Renard KG. Soil erosion : processes, prediction, measurement, and control [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons; 2002 [cited 2017 Mar 16]. 338 p.

  2. OECD. Environmental Performance of Agriculture at a Glance [Internet]. OECD PUBLICATIONS, 2, rue André-Pascal, 75775 PARIS CEDEX 16; 2008 [cited 2017 Mar 27]. 124 p. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/sustainable-agriculture/40953155.pdf

  3. Panagos P, Imeson A, Meusburger K, Borrelli P, Poesen J, Alewell C. Soil Conservation in Europe: Wish or Reality? L Degrad Dev. 2016;27(6):1547–51.

  4. Boardman J, Poesen J. Soil Erosion in Europe: Major Processes, Causes and Consequences. In: Soil Erosion in Europe. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2006. p. 477–87.

  5. Gutman G. Land-Cover and Land-Use Changes in Eastern Europe after the Collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 [Internet]. 2017. Available from: http://link.springer.com/DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42638-9

  6. Llasat MC, Llasat-Botija M, Prat MA, Por U F, Price C, Mugnai A, et al. High-impact floods and flash floods in Mediterranean countries: the FLASH preliminary database. Adv Geosci [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2017 Feb 8];23:47–55. Available from: www.adv-geosci.net/23/47/2010/

  7. Douvinet J, Van De Wiel MJ, Delahaye D, Cossart E. A flash flood hazard assessment in dry valleys (northern France) by cellular automata modelling. Nat Hazards [Internet]. 2015 Feb [cited 2018 Dec 31];75(3):2905–29. Available from: http://link.springer.com/DOI: 10.1007/s11069-014-1470-3

  8. EU Directive. Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2017 Apr 5]. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32007L0060

  9. EU CC. Cross-compliance | Agriculture and rural development [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2017 Apr 5]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/envir/cross-compliance_en

  10. EU CAP. The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) in your country | Agriculture and rural development [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2017 Apr 5]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-in-your-country_en

  11. Azam M, Kim HS, Maeng SJ. Development of flood alert application in Mushim stream watershed Korea. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2017;

  12. Báčová M, Krása J. Application of Historical and Recent Aerial Imagery in Monitoring Water Erosion Occurrences in Czech Highlands. Soil Water Res [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 Nov 3];11(4):267–76. Available from: http://www.agriculturejournals.cz/publicFiles/196778.pdf

  13. Graves AR, Morris J, Deeks LK, Rickson RJ, Kibblewhite MG, Harris JA, et al. The total costs of soil degradation in England and Wales. Ecol Econ [Internet]. 2015 Nov 1 [cited 2019 May 13];119:399–413. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800915003171

  14. Panagos P, Standardi G, Borrelli P, Lugato E, Montanarella L, Bosello F. Cost of agricultural productivity loss due to soil erosion in the European Union: From direct cost evaluation approaches to the use of macroeconomic models. L Degrad Dev [Internet]. 2018 Mar 1 [cited 2019 May 13];29(3):471–84. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2879

  15. Bauer M, Dostal T, Krasa J, Jachymova B, David V, Devaty J, et al. Risk to residents, infrastructure, and water bodies from flash floods and sediment transport. Environ Monit Assess [Internet]. 2019;191(2):85. Available from: DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7216-7

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list

Connected events

SGEM WORLD SCIENCE Conferences

The EPS Library connects published research with the scientific events where it was presented, reviewed and prepared for long-term scholarly discovery.

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SGEM GeoConference

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM

Explore the main SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Earth and Planetary Sciences, where research becomes conference presentation, proceedings publication and long-term library visibility.

Visit sgem.org
SGEM Vienna Green
SGEM Vienna Green

Green Sciences and Sustainability

Explore SGEM Vienna Green — connecting sustainability, environmental science, climate research, green technologies and interdisciplinary solutions for the future.

Visit sgemviennagreen.org

International Indexing & Global Visibility of Our Scientific Publications

SGEM scientific publications gain international visibility through a broad network of scholarly indexing and abstracting databases, citation-tracking services, research discovery platforms, and academic repositories.

Depending on the platform, our publications may be accessible as indexed bibliographic records, abstracts, citation data, DOI-linked metadata, or full-text scientific papers. Coverage and availability vary across platforms and publication years.

Scopus

Scopus Scientific Database

Compendex

Engineering abstracts
& indexing

Clarivate Databases

Scientific Databases

EBSCO

EBSCO
Science Services Database

OpenAIRE

Linked research discovery
& metadata

ProQuest

Scientific Databases
Part of Clarivate

Ulrichsweb

Global serials directory
Part of Clarivate

Crossref

We are a voting CrossRef member - the official DOI provider

Dimensions

Research discovery, citations
& metadata

ScienceOpen

Research discovery
& metadata

HAL

Multidisciplinary archive
& metadata

Petroleum Abstracts

Scientific Database
Part of Clarivate

Google Scholar

Google Scholar
Scholarly Search

Scilit

Scientific literature discovery
& metadata

RSCI

Russian Science Citation Index
Part of Web of Science

OpenAlex

Open research index
& metadata

Mendeley

Scientific Databases
Part of Elsevier

GeoRef

GeoRef — AGI
Geoscience Bibliographic Database