SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

COMPARING BACKUP AND RESTORE EFICIENCY IN MYSQL, MS SQL SERVER AND MONGODB

Ivan Kuyumdzhiev

First published: 2019-06-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2019/2.1/s07.022View metrics

Abstract

This paper suggests that in order to create efficient backup and recovery strategy for database management system, an appropriate unit of analysis and a proper, data is needed. Key factors for evaluating backup and recovery are time needed to bring the system back online and the amount of data loss. The paper examines methods for managing these factors in three of the most popular DBMS ? MySQL, MS SQL Server and MongoDB. Each of them has a set of backup types that can be combined in different strategies. Depending on characteristics of the database (such as size, modify rate etc.) the combination could lead to efficient results or slowing down the system performance and loss of data. Some advantages and disadvantages of the examined DBMS are found and preferable presets to be used for better efficiency are defined. The reason these findings are important is that they help database administrators to build the best backup and recovery strategy depending on organization's needs

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 17

Publication details

Title
COMPARING BACKUP AND RESTORE EFICIENCY IN MYSQL, MS SQL SERVER AND MONGODB
Authors
Ivan Kuyumdzhiev
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2019, Informatics, Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2019
Pages
167-174
SWS Citekey
Kuyumdzhiev20197167174
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7408-79-9
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References0
0references registered for this publication

Structured references will appear here after the reference import pass. The count is preserved now so the scholarly record is not incomplete.

Citing literature

Number of times cited according to Crossref: 10

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list