SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

ORGANIC SUBSTANCES IN WOODCHIP AQUEOUS LEACHATES AND THEIR ECOTOXICITY

Kateřina Schrimpelová

First published: 2018-06-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2018/5.1/s20.077View metrics

Abstract

Woodchip material is one of the most promising fill media for denitrifying bioreactors. Woodchip denitrifying bioreactors are used for nitrate reduction in the outlets of drainage systems, shallow groundwaters, etc. Despite their overall positive effect, undesirable leaching of organic compounds from the fill medium can occur during a bioreactor?s start-up phase. The released organic compounds can cause oxygen depletion and some of them can have a toxic effect on biota. The paper presents the quality of leachates of five wood-based materials which can be used as denitrifying bioreactor media, i.e. oak, poplar, beech, spruce, and a mixture of pine+larch. The leachates were prepared on a rotating shaker. The quality of the leachates varied according to the wood species both in their physicochemical parameters ? pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), phenolic compounds, and in their toxicity. Oak showed the highest leachability of organic compounds (COD 3,370 mg/L, BOD 750 mg/L, DOC 1,435 mg/L), followed by spruce (COD 1,930 mg/L, BOD 570 mg/L, DOC 770 mg/L). The leachability of organics from poplar and beech was similar and reached medium values, while the leachate of pine+larch contained the lowest concentration of organic compounds. Overall leachability of organic substances corresponded with the leachability of low-molecular phenolic compounds. In the leachates of oak and spruce phenol, o-, m-, and p-cresol, thymol, p-ethylphenol, and p-valerylphenol were found. The chemical composition of leachates led to expected toxicity levels. The highest toxicities were determined for oak and spruce leachates with a sensitive response from both test organisms, Sinapis alba and Thamnocephalus platyurus. The leachates of poplar and beech showed moderate toxicity for crustaceans, while for higher plants they were non-toxic. The leachate of pine+larch was non-toxic for both test organisms.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
ORGANIC SUBSTANCES IN WOODCHIP AQUEOUS LEACHATES AND THEIR ECOTOXICITY
Authors
Kateřina Schrimpelová
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2018, Ecology, Economics, Education and Legislation
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2018
Pages
597-604
SWS Citekey
Schrimpelova201820597604
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7408-46-1
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References15
  1. Schipper L. A., Robertson W. D., Gold A. J., Jaynes D. B. & Cameron S. C. Denitrifying bioreactors – An approach for reducing nitrate loads to receiving waters, Ecological Engineering, vol. 36/issue 11, pp 1532–1543, 2010.

  2. Taylor B.R., Goudey J.S. & Carmichael N.B. Toxicity of aspen wood leachate to aquatic life: laboratory studies, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, vol. 15/ issue 2, pp 150–159, 1996.

  3. Svensson H., Marques M., Kaczala F. & Hogland W. Leaching patterns from wood of different tree species and environmental implications related to wood storage areas, Water and Environmental Journal, vol. 228, pp 277–284, 2014.

  4. Samis S.C., Liu S.D., Wernick B.G. & Nassichuck M.D. Mitigation of fisheries impacts from the use and disposal of wood residue in British Columbia and the Yukon. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2296, Canada, pp 91–49, 1999.

  5. World Health Organization. Health and Safety Guide No. 100: Cresols health and safety guide [Online], International Programme on Chemical Safety, 1996. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/38142/9241511001_eng.pdf [2018-03-20].

  6. Pitter P. Hydrochemie, VŠCHT v Praze, Czech Republic, pp 455–459, 2015.

  7. Michałowicz J. & Duda W. Phenols – Sources and toxicity, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, vol. 16/issue 3, pp 347–362, 2007.

  8. Marchese A., Orhan I. E., Daglia M., Barbieri R., Di Lorenzo A., Nabavi S.F., Grotzi O., Izadi M. & Nabavi S.M. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of thymol: A brief review of the literature, Food Chemistry, vol. 210, pp 402–414, 2016.

  9. Makris S.P. & Banerjee S. Fate of resin acids in pulp mill secondary treatment systems, Water Research, vol. 36/issue 11, pp 2878–2882, 2002.

  10. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Toxicological profile for cresols [Online], U.S.A., 2008. Available at: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp34.pdf [2018-04-10].

  11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. ECOTOX Knowledgebase [Online], U.S.A., 2018. Available at: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ecotox/ [2018-03-25].

  12. Kahru A., Põllumaa L., Reiman R., Rätsep A., Lüders M. & Maloveryan A. The toxicity and biodegradability of eight main phenolic compounds characteristic to the oil-shale industry wastewaters: A test battery approach, Environmental Toxicology, vol. 15/ issue 5, pp 431–442, 2000.

  13. Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic (MŽP). Metodický pokyn odboru odpadů ke stanovení ekotoxicity odpadů, Věstník MŽP, ročník XVII, částka 4/2007, Czech Republic, 2007.

  14. MicroBio Tests Inc. THAMNOTOXKIT F Crustacean Toxicity Screening Test for Freshwater: Standard operational procedure [Online], Belgium, 2015. Available at: http://www.microbiotests.be/SOPs/Thamnotoxkit%20F%20SOP%20-%20A5.pdf

  15. Newman M.C. Fundamentals of Ecotoxicology: The Science of Pollution, 4th edition, CRC Press, 2014.

Citing literature

Number of times cited according to Crossref: 2

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list

Connected events

SGEM WORLD SCIENCE Conferences

The EPS Library connects published research with the scientific events where it was presented, reviewed and prepared for long-term scholarly discovery.

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SGEM GeoConference

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM

Explore the main SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Earth and Planetary Sciences, where research becomes conference presentation, proceedings publication and long-term library visibility.

Visit sgem.org
SGEM Vienna Green
SGEM Vienna Green

Green Sciences and Sustainability

Explore SGEM Vienna Green — connecting sustainability, environmental science, climate research, green technologies and interdisciplinary solutions for the future.

Visit sgemviennagreen.org

International Indexing & Global Visibility of Our Scientific Publications

Scopus

Scopus Scientific Database

Compendex

Engineering abstracts
& indexing

Clarivate

Scientific Databases

EBSCO

EBSCO
Science Services Database

OpenAIRE

Linked research discovery
& metadata

ProQuest

Scientific Databases
Part of Clarivate

Crossref

We are a voting CrossRef member - the official DOI provider

ScienceOpen

Research discovery
& metadata

HAL

Multidisciplinary archive
& metadata

Petroleum Abstracts

Scientific Database
Part of Clarivate

Google Scholar

Google Scholar
Scholarly Search

RSCI

Russian Science Citation Index
Part of Web of Science

OpenAlex

Open research index
& metadata

Mendeley

Scientific Databases
Part of Elsevier

GeoRef

GeoRef — AGI
Geoscience Bibliographic Database