SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

INDICATORS AND SUB-INDICATORS CHARACTERIZING COMPETITIVENESS OF FORESTRY COMPANIES

Константин Колев, Nikolay Stoenchev, Nasko Iliev, Galin Milchev, Maya Tsoklinova

First published: 2022-11-15https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022/3.1/s14.44View metrics

Abstract

In connection with elaboration of scientific project -Statistical study of forestry companies competitiveness- and on the basis of the accumulated national and foreign experience a system of indicators and sub-indicators for complex quantitative assessment of forestry companies competitiveness has been offered. The proposed indicators are: competitiveness of product being offered; labor productivity; financial results; enterprise growth; market adaptability; economic realization of property of forest resources; silvicultural activities. In current paper are presented the scientific results from the verification of the offered indicators and sub-indicators reliability.1. The verification is carried out on the basis of questionnaire survey among specialists connected with forestry. The questionnaire includes two parts. Through the first one is checked the reliability of the system of indicators related with competitiveness of economic subjects that manage Bulgarian forest territories. By means of the second part is checked the reliability of the system of indicators connected with competitiveness of economic subjects engaged with timber harvesting and silvicultural activities in Bulgarian forest territories. On the grounds of the collected and processed data the initial system of indicators and sub-indicators is supplemented and improved.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Citations
  • CrossRef - Citation Indexes: 1
  • Scopus - Citation Indexes: 0
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 2
PLUMX see details

Publication details

Title
INDICATORS AND SUB-INDICATORS CHARACTERIZING COMPETITIVENESS OF FORESTRY COMPANIES
Authors
Константин Колев, Nikolay Stoenchev, Nasko Iliev, Galin Milchev, Maya Tsoklinova
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference- EXPO Proceedings; 22nd SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings 2022, Water Resources. Forest, Marine and Ocean Ecosystems
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2022
Pages
357-364
SWS Citekey
Kolev202214357364
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7603-42-2
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
forestrycompetitivenessindicatorssub-indicatorsquestionnaire survey
References12

  1. Becker, R., J. Berger, D. Glauser, D. Glauser, B. Jann. Experiments in the Sociology of Education - Promises and Experiences, Swiss Journal of Sociology, 48(1),pp 9-19, 2022. DOI: 10.2478/sjs-2022-0003

    View DOICrossrefGoogle ScholarWeb of ScienceScopusOpenCitations

  2. Beev, I. Za modeliraneto v ikonomikata. Sbornik dokladi ot nauchna konferentziya �Razvitie na bulgarskata ikonomika � 25 godini mejdu ochakvaniyata i realnostite�, Stopanska akademiya �D. Cenov�, Svishtov, 632 s., 2015.

  3. Bowen, G. Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method, Qualitative Research Journal, vol. 9, �2, pp 27-40, 2009. DOI: 103316/QRJ0902027 DOI: 10.3316/qrj0902027

    View DOICrossrefGoogle ScholarWeb of ScienceScopusOpenCitations

  4. Dimitrov, D. V. Upravlenie na konflikta. S., 232 s., 2005.

  5. Giddens, A. Sociology. Cambridge, 1989. Giddens, A. (1989). Sociology (pp 549 & 40). Cambridge: Polity Press. DOI: 10.2307/590276

    View DOICrossrefGoogle ScholarWeb of ScienceScopusOpenCitations

  6. Igwe, I., A. Odii. Research Methods and Key Issues in Sociological Research. In book: Introduction to Sociology African Culture, Context and Complexity. Publishesher:Igbinedion University, Okada, pp 67-81.

  7. Jones, S., F. Murphy, M. Edwards, J. James. Doing things differently: advantages and disadvantages of Web questionary. Nurse Researches, 15 (4), pp 15-26, 2008. DOI: 10.7748/nr2008.07.15.4.15.c6658

    View DOICrossrefGoogle ScholarWeb of ScienceScopusOpenCitations

  8. Kolev, K., N. Stoenchev, N. Iliev, G. Milchev, E. Stefanova. Theoretical and Conceptual Framework for Research on Competitiveness of Forestry Company, 21th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference � SGEM 2021, Albena, pp 657-664, 2021. DOI: 10.5593/sgem2021/3.1/s14.82

    View DOICrossrefGoogle ScholarWeb of ScienceScopusOpenCitations

  9. Kawulich, B. Participant Observation as a Data Collection Method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol. 6 � 2, Art. 43, 29 p., 2005, ISSN 1438-5627.

  10. Mihaylov, S. Empirichnoto sociologichesko izsledvane. S., 387 s., 1980.

  11. Opdenakker, R. Advantages and Disadvantages of Four Interview Techniques in Qualitative Research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol. 7, � 4, Art. 11, 2006. DOI: 10.17169/fqs-7.4.175

    View DOICrossrefGoogle ScholarWeb of ScienceScopusOpenCitations

  12. Pachev, T., B. Kolev, V. Valov i dr. Ikonomicheska sociologiya. UI �Stopanstvo� S., 422 s., 2005.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list