SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE TAXATION OF WASTE DISPOSAL IN EUROPE

Merve Ergun

First published: 2022-12-27https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022v/4.2/s18.01View metrics

Abstract

Taxation can be used as a tool to promote sustainable waste management and recycling of industrial plastic, paper and glass; therefore, this article aims to assess the effectiveness of existing waste taxes by considering their effects on waste generation and disposal in Europe. In this context, a comparative study has been carried out to understand taxpayers- behaviours towards waste taxation, tax rates and methods preferred to calculate the amount of tax to be paid. Sustainable waste management is of particular importance for countries and requires effective investment and financing mechanisms. It can be argued that today-s tax systems are asked to contribute to sustainable development by eradicating poverty, reducing inequalities and using tax incentives to limit the amount of waste produced. This also means that tax systems, from time to time, may require to take more proactive Pigouvian roles. Collection of waste tax is mostly under the responsibility of local authorities, and these authorities may opt different methods, such as: Unit-Based Pricing (UBP) and pay-asyou-throw (PAYT) schemes, while calculating the amount of tax to be collected. Pigouvian taxes intend to discourage consumption of products that affect society and/or environment hazardously; therefore, it is argued that the waste taxes that are not inconformity with the Pigouvian approach should be updated because waste taxes should not only finance the service taken by the users(taxpayers), but also promote recycling and protect the environment and human health.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Citations
  • CrossRef - Citation Indexes: 1
  • Scopus - Citation Indexes: 1
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 13

Publication details

Title
A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE TAXATION OF WASTE DISPOSAL IN EUROPE
Authors
Merve Ergun
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference- EXPO Proceedings; 22nd SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings 2022, Energy and Clean Technologies, VOL 22, ISSUE 4.2
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2022
Pages
3-12
SWS Citekey
Ergun202218312
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7603-50-7
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References12
  1. Laura Seelkopf, Moritz Bubek, Edgars Eihmanis, Joseph Ganderson, Julian Limberg, Youssef Mnaili, Paula Zuluaga and Philipp Genschel,The rise of modern taxation: A new comprehensive dataset of tax introductions worldwide, The Review of International Organizations, 2021, pp240;

  2. Caterina Coco, -Emission Trading between environment and company in Italy- International Law Review 2010 January-December 239.

  3. Timothy O'Riordan, Heather Voisey, Sustainable Development in Western Europe: Coming to Terms with Agenda 21 ( Psychology Press, 1997) 41

  4. Francesco Nicolli and Massimiliano Mazzanti Landfill diversion in a decentralized setting: A dynamic assessment of landfill taxes Resources, Conservation and Recycling 81 (2013) 17 DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.09.008

  5. Todorovic, Brankica,-Waste management and sustainable economic development in the modern economies- (2019)CES Working Papers, ISSN 2067-7693, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Centre for European Studies, Iasi, 10(4) 464

  6. Lael K. Weis,- Environmental constitutionalism: Aspiration or transformation?- I-CON, Vol. 16 (3), pp 837,2018 DOI: 10.1093/icon/moy063

  7. Lene Hjollund and Gert Tinggaard Svendsen, -Why Green Taxation?- ent - (2001)12(1)32 DOI: 10.1260/0958305011500571

  8. Thornton Matheson, -Disposal is Not Free: Fiscal Instruments to Internalize the Environmental Costs of Solid Waste 2019 IMF Working Paper: WP/19/283 Business& Economics 10. DOI: 10.5089/9781513521589.001

  9. European Environment Agency, Environmental Taxes : Implementation and Environmental Effectiveness (1996)10

  10. E. Dijkgraaf and R.H.J.M. Gradus -Cost savings in unit-based pricing of household waste The case of The Netherlands- Resource and Energy Economics 26 (2004) 353 DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2004.01.001

  11. Reuven S. Avi-Yonah and Yoseph M. Edrey, -Constitutional Review of Federal Tax Legislation- U of Michigan Law & Econ Research Paper No. 21-007, 1 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3771017 accessed 9 July 2022.

  12. Adam J. Hoffer, William F. Shughart II and Michael D. Thomas, Sin Taxes and Sindustry: Revenue, Paternalism, and Political Interest The Independent Review , Summer 2014, Vol. 19, No. 1 (Summer 2014),56

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list