SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

USING THE HARVESTLAB TECHNOLOGY FOR A VARIABLE APPLICATION OF DIGESTATE FROM THE BIOGAS PLANT - FIRST OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCES IN TERMS OF ITS INFLUENCE ON THE YIELD OF ZEA MAYS L

Jakub Elbl, Antonín Kintl, Vojtěch Lukas, Jaroslav Pinkas, Igor Huňády

First published: 2025-08-15https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2025/2.1/s09.23View metrics

Abstract

The submitted paper focuses the issue of using a new technology of Near Infrared Reflectance (NIR) sensors in practice for dosing organic fertilizers based on their composition. The HarvestLab 3000 system was tested in a selected enterprise in terms of its usability in practice. In 2021, an experimental plot was selected in a conventional company situated in the southern part of Czech Republic. The HarvestLab 3000 system with the NIR technology was used for the variable (VR) dosage of digestate as a basic fertilization of Zea mays L. based on the content of potassium (K). Zones with different yield potentials (YP) were demarcated on the plot and mean dose of digestate was determined according to the initial K content in this fertilizer. Zones with the mean YP were applied 32.5 kg K/ha. The dose of K was increasing with the growing YP by up to +15 % and decreasing with the falling YP by up to -15 %. The amount of applied digestate was changing in dependence on the content of K therein, which was quantified by using the HarvestLab 3000 system. Further, a control belt was demarcated on the plot, with a flat rate application (PAU) of 13,800 kg/ha of digestate. The Zea mays L. was harvested using the cutter model 9700 equipped with the yield meter and HarvestLab 3000 system for quality measurements (ADF, NDF, sugar, starch, crude protein) of harvested biomass. The measured values demonstrated (P less than 0.05) that the VR application had no negative impact on the yield and quality of harvested Zea mays L. biomass. The yield in dry matter was 14,710 kg/ha in Variant VR and 13,470 kg/ha in Variant PAU. Although the difference is not significant (P>0.05), a mean digestate application in Variant VR reached 12,900 kg/ha while it was 13,800 kg/ha in Variant PAU. Therefore, the HarvestLab300 may lead to a greater effectiveness of the utilization of nutrients contained in organic fertilizers.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 1
Dimensions ID: pub.1195348456

Publication details

Title
USING THE HARVESTLAB TECHNOLOGY FOR A VARIABLE APPLICATION OF DIGESTATE FROM THE BIOGAS PLANT - FIRST OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCES IN TERMS OF ITS INFLUENCE ON THE YIELD OF ZEA MAYS L
Authors
Jakub Elbl, Antonín Kintl, Vojtěch Lukas, Jaroslav Pinkas, Igor Huňády
Proceedings
25th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings SGEM 2025, Geoinformatics, Remote Sensing, and Artificial Intelligence (AI), Vol 25, Issue 2.1
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2025
Pages
199-206
SWS Citekey
Elbl20259199206
ISSN
1314-2704; 13142704
ISBN
9786197603897
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References12
  1. Stra�il Z., Vach M., Smutn� V., The energy effectiveness of crops in crop rotation under-different soil tillage systems, Agriculture (Pol'nohospodarstvo), vol. 61/issue 3, 77-87, 2015, DOI: 10.1515/agri-2015-0013.

  2. Kintl A., �meringai J., Lo��k T., Hunady I., Sobotkov� J., Hru�ovsk� T., Varga L., Vejra�ka K., Elbl J., The Effect of Soil Heterogeneity on the Content of Macronutrients and Micronutrients in the Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), Soil Systems, vol. 8/issue 3, 75, 2024, DOI: 10.3390/soilsystems8030075.

  3. Hangs R.D., Schoenau J.J., Knight J.D., Farrell R.E., Variable rate precision application of feedlot cattle manure mitigates soil greenhouse gas emissions, Geoderma, vol. 454, 117172, 2025, DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117172.

  4. Elbl J., Mezera J., Kintl A., �irucek P., Lukas V., Comparisons of Uniform and Variable Rate Nitrogen Fertilizer Applications in Real Conditions � Evaluation of Potential Impact on the Yield of Wheat Available for Use in Animal Feed, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Sil-viculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, vol. 69/issue 1, 33-43, 2021. DOI: 10.11118/actaun.2021.003

  5. Guindo M.L., Kabir M.H., Chen R., Liu F., Particle Swarm Optimization and Multiple Stacked Generalizations to Detect Nitrogen and Organic-Matter in Organic-Fertilizer Using Vis-NIR, Sensors, vol. 21/issue 14, 4882, 2021, DOI: 10.3390/s21144882.

  6. Deere & Company, ISG Training HarvestLabTM300 John Deere, John Deere GmbH & Co KG, Germany, 198 pages, 2018.

  7. Horf M., Gebbers R., Olfs H.W., Vogel S., Determining nutrients, dry matter, and pH of liquid organic manures using visual and near-infrared spektrometry, Science of The Total En-vironment, vol. 908, 168045, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168045.

  8. Johannesson G.H., Lauzon J., Crolla A., Gilroyed B., Vanderzaag A., Gordon R., Impact of manure storage conditions and time on decomposition of and losses from liquid dairy ma-nure stored in a temperate climate, Canadian Journal of Soil Science, vol. 98/issue 1, 148-160, 2018, DOI: 10.1139/cjss-2017-0083.

  9. Lukas V., Neudert L., �irucek P., Nov�k J., Elbl J., Effect of variable rate application of phosphorus and potassium in sugar beet, Listy Cukrovarnick� a Reparsk�, vol. 137/issue 12, 417-422, 2021.

  10. Miao Y., Mulla D.J., Robert P.C., Identifying important factors influencing corn yield and grain quality variability using artificial neural networks, Precision Agriculture, vol. 7/issue 2, 117-135, 2006, DOI: 10.1007/s11119-006-9004-y.

  11. Cueva S.F., Harper M., Roth G.W., Wells H., Canale C., Gallo A., Masoero F., Hristov A.N., Effects of ensiling time on corn silage starch ruminal degradability evaluated in situ or in vitro, Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 106/issue 6, 3961-3974, 2023, DOI: 10.3168/jds.2022-22817.

  12. Orney R.C., Gramkow J.K., Hilscher F.H., Erickson G.E., MacDonald J.C., Klopfenstein T.J., Watson A.K., Corn silage rumen undegradable protein content and response of growing calves to rumen undegradable protein supplement, Translational Animal Science, vol. 3/issue 1, 51-59, 2019, DOI: 10.1093/tas/txz014.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list