Scholarly record
GEOPARKS AND CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
Abstract
Geopark networks are expanding globally, with the main purpose to protect geoheritage. In many places of the world geopark sites are associated with local cultural heritage and indigenous people. These links sometimes are synergistic, whereby geoparks serve as important protected areas that allow for preservation of important cultural objects and even support livelihoods of indigenous people. However, in some cases geopark development is perceived negatively by local communities and might have potentially damaging effects on local culture. Geopark networks are likely to expand and may have important contribution to local culture preservation. However, in order to successfully implement new geoparks it is important to understand factors contributing to their positive effects on local cultures and the ways to address potential conflict areas. In this article we critically evaluate these factors, considering both synergies and conflicts, and propose recommendations for new geopark siting and management that could help to maximise their contribution to cultural conservation and development.
Publication Impact Profile
- Captures
- Mendeley - Readers: 8
Publication details
References11
UNESCO, UNESCO Global Geoparks [online]. Available from: https://www.unesco.org/en/iggp/geoparks/about [Accessed on the 1st of June 2023].
UNESCO, UNESCO Strategy for Action on Climate Change. UNESCO. General Conference, 39th, 2017, Report Nr. 39 C/46. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000259255 [Accessed on the 1st of April 2023], 2017.
Scheidel, A. et al. Environmental conflicts and defenders: A global overview. Global Environmental Change, Vol. 63, 102104, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102104
Stronza, A. et al. Through a New Mirror: Reflections on Tourism and Identity in the Amazon. Human Organization, Vol. 67, Issue 3, pp. 244�257, 2008. DOI: 10.17730/humo.67.3.a556044720353823
Kosanic, A. and Petzold, J., A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services and human wellbeing. Ecosystem Services, Vol. 46, 101168, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101168
Berchin, I.I. et al. Climate change and forced migrations: An effort towards recognizing climate refugees. Geoforum, Vol. 84, pp. 147-150, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.022
Fakhrana, A. and Zafran R. Sustainable Cultural Tourism Development: a Strategic for Revenue Generation in Local Communities. Journal of Economic and Tropical Life Science, Vol. 4, Issue 2, pp.47-56, 2020.
Mato, D. Indigenous People in Latin America: Movements and Universities. Achievements, Challenges, and Intercultural Conflicts. Journal of Intercultural Studies, Vol. 37, Issue 3, pp. 211-233, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/07256868.2016.1163536
UNESCO, Application dossier for UNESCO Global Geoparks [online]. UNESCO. Available from: https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/uggp_application_dossier_oct2018_2.pdf [Accessed on 27 of May.2023], 2018.
Gillson, L. et al. et al. Finding Common Ground between Adaptive Management and Evidence-Based Approaches to Biodiversity Conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 34, Issue 1, pp. 31-44, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.10.003
Fidler, R.Y. et al. Participation, not penalties: Community involvement and equitable governance contribute to more effective multiuse protected areas. Science Advances, Vol. 8, Issue 18, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abl8929, 2022.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.