THEORETICAL BASES OF INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF SUBSURFACE MANAGEMENT

inventions of a new technology (novelty);

innovation is the commercial and industrial introduction of novelty. During periods of time when basic innovations exhaust their innovative potential (the rate of profit they bring decreases), we can see "technological stalemate", which causes a slowdown, and then stagnation (zero-negative) of the innovative development. The "metamorphoses model" proposed by G. Mensch is most consistent, in our opinion, with the current period of subsurface management, when the main developed deposits of almost all minerals tend to deplete them. Russian science has begun to study the features of innovative development after the transition to the construction of a market model for the development of the national economy. For example, N. L. Marenkov and A. I. Prigozhin [10] mistakenly, in our opinion, tried to justify the synonymous identity of the terms "innovation" "novation"and " novelty". In our opinion, the category "novelty" characterizes innovation as a product, as the result of specific labor, which has new consumer characteristics and a new use value. Our point of view corresponds to the interpretation of the essence of novelty in the works of C. V. Valdaytsev, A. S. Kulagin, N. N. Molchanov and a number of other researchers. This idea is most briefly and accurately reflected in the verbal formula [11] : Innovation = Novelty + Efficiency from novelty introduction (1) In such a context, innovation as a commercialized novelty that can bring profit after its introduction into the economic process is understood by most modern domestic and foreign scientists (A. G., Aairapetov, V. M., Vasiltsov S. U. Glazyev., V. N. Lapin V. G. Medynsky U.V.Yakovets ,Iord T., Tiss D., Twiss B.). Thus, based on the understanding of innovation as a commercialized novelty and production changes, which is already found in the works of J. Schumpeter, it follows that innovative development is a process of technology change. Consequently, the nature management also changes with the introduction of novelties, since any new, different technology is a new, different use of natural and social economic resources, the transformation of resources into new factors of production of goods. This approach is consistent with the concept of A. E. Karlik and A. B. Titov, who consider innovation as a process of novelty introduction, while the process of spreading novelties in production and in the market is "diffusion or adaptation of novelties" [12]. Based on the process- based methodological approach of representatives of the St. Petersburg scientific school A. A. Alekseev, S. V. Valdaytsev, V. S. Vasiltsov, A. E. Karlik, A. B. Titov, D. A. Polshkov, A. V. Samoylov, and others, it is proposed to understand the innovative development of subsurface management in the context of irreversible structural changes in MRS enterprises, on the basis of which a new qualitative state of the entire economic system is replicated and reproduced [13]. We believe that the new quality of the economic system is the main goal of the functioning of the social factor (workers and entrepreneurs) in the field of subsurface management. Let's clarify the concept of "development" as a noun in the dual category "innovative development". J. Schumpeter was one of the first to use the concept of" development " in relation to the economy, and defined it as an irreversible process aimed at improving production [14]. C. I. Ozhegov [15] similarly interprets this meaning in his dictionary. He identifies three mandatory characteristics of development – its direction, regularity and irreversibility. The particular interest in this context is the sign of irreversible changes, which is confirmed by the fact that innovative development of subsurface management leads to a new state of an economic entity – an enterprise, industry, etc., which manifests itself as a change in its structure. Half a century ago, the prevailing view in the economy was that technological shifts under the pressure of STR are unmanageable processes. Today, scientists are trying to refute this approach. So, D. Shmukler proves that the inventiveness is susceptible to the influence and pressure of economic factors. Therefore, it can be planned further-managed by intellectual and entrepreneurial actions, and physically - by hired managers and employees [16]. This indicates a change in the mission of the social factor in the innovative development of subsurface management, which is currently managed by man and can be reproducible (renewable) or destructive anthropogenic. CONCLUSION We propose to understand the innovative development of nature management as the progressive development of MRS industries, based on the use of scientific knowledge in all areas of the economy, provided that social interaction for the introduction of innovations in the scientific, technical, technological and organizational-legal sphere. The content of the innovative development of nature management lies in avoiding rent-oriented behavior of economic entities MRS on the basis of the introductions of novelties in the levels of integration in the process chain from subsurface management, then – on the transformation of natural resources and to obtain the final product with high added value compared to raw commodity sectors. REFERENCES 1] Kulikov L. M. Economic theory. Textbook. Moscow: Prospect, 2014. P. 286.

Bobylev, S. N. Russia on the path of anti-sustainable development // Economic issue. - 2014. - no. 2. рp. 43-53.

Vasiltsova, V.M. Methodology of Management Innovation Hypercompetition // Asian Social Science. Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education. ISSN 1911-2017 E-ISSN 1911-2025. Vol. 11, No. 20; 2015. рр. 165-169.

Emelyanov, A. G. Fundamentals of environmental management: textbook-5th ed., ster. - M.: Academy, 2019-304 p. [1] Kose, R. firm, market and law: collection of articles /P. Kose: translated from the English by B. Pinsker; scientific ed. by R. Kapelyushnikov. - Moscow: New publishing house, 2007. - p.224

Yadgarov Y History of economic doctrines. - Moscow: Ekonomika, 1996. - p 480.

Nedosekin A. O. Strategic approach to assessing the economic stability of objects of the mineral resource complex of Russia / Nedosekin A. O., Reishakhrit E. I., Kozlovsky Y. A. N. / / Notes of the Mining Institute, 2019. Vol. 237, P. 354-360. DOI: 10.31897/pmi.2019.3.354

Кhaikin M. M. Service capital: Publishing house LAP LAMBERT Academic Pablishing, 2011. – p 401.

Hamilton D. Technology. Man and the Environment. Neu—York, 1973.P.41.

Sopin V. S. Evolutionary theory in economic science: problems and prospects / V. S. Sopin // Problems of modern economy. 2009. # 3 (31).

Energy strategy of Russia for the period up to 2035 (edition of 21.09.2016) ES-2035 project / http://minenergo.gov.ru/node/1920. Date of access 24.04.20.

D. Stiegler Economy on the scale of production / D. Stigler (the Economies of Scale), 1958. P. 235

Karlik, A. E. Innovative aspects of enterprise development/ A. E. Karlik, A. B. Titov, A. A. Alekseev, D. A. Polshkov, A.V. Samoylov. - Saint Petersburg: Spbguef Publishing House, 2019. - P. 147

Аrrow K. D. Public choice and individual preferences/ Access mode http://www.consultant.ru/document .(date of request 24.04.20) 14] Forecast of energy development in the world and Russia until 2040. INEI RAS-Analytical Center under the Government of the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2014. - access Mode:https://www.eriras.ru/files/forecast_2040.pdf .(date of request 24.04.20)

Hicks J.R. Mr. Keynes and the 'Classics': A Suggested Interpretation FL.: Ballinger Pub Co, 1978. - P. 241.

Schmookler, J. The Size of Firm and the Growth of Knowledge. Patents, invention, and economic change. Edited by Z. Griliches, L. Hurwicz. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 1972. – P.86.