THE IMPACT OF DEFORESTATION ON THE STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS OF ECONOMIC PROFILE IN THE MOST AFFECTED TERRITORIAL SYSTEMS IN ROMANIA

UNCED-Agenda 21 1992, United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de J anerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992 , chapter 11, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf;

UNCSD Report 2012, Report of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 20 –22 June 2012, pp.37 http://www.uncsd2012.org/content/documents/814UNCSD%20REPORT%20final %20revs.pdf;

State of the World‘s Forests Enhancing the socioeconomic benefits from forests, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations , Rome, Italy, 2014, http://www.fao.org/3/cf470fab-cc3c-4a50-b124-16a306ee11a6/i3710e.pdf;

Teodorescu C., Dinca I., Tuduce A., Popovici A., Tourism based on vegetal element in the UNESCO patrimony Romanian monasteries frescoes, Recent Researches in Social Science, Digital Convergence, Manu facturing and Tourism - IC-SSSE-DC'11, ICM-CTS'11, pp. 28-33, 2011;

Md.Abdus S., Toshikuni N., Factors influencing the loss of forest cover in Bangladesh: An analysis from socioeconomic and demographic perspectives, Journal of Forest Research, vol. 3/issue 3, pp 145-150, 1998;

Angelsen A., Kaimowitz D., Rethinking the causes of deforestation: lessons from economic models. World Bank Res., Obs. 14, pp 73– 98, 1999;

Meyfroidt P., Lambin E.F., Global forest transition: prospects for an end to deforestation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 36, pp 343 –371, 2011;

Curtea de Conturi a României, Sinteza Raportului de audit privind „Situația patrimonială a fondului forestier din România, în perioada 1990 -2012” București, pp 99 -102, 2013, http://www.curteadeconturi.ro/Publicatii/economie7.pdf;

Greenpeace România, Tăierile ilegale de arbori din pădurile din România -2012, pp 8, 2013, http://www.greenpeace.org/romania/ro/;

Stern N. Part VI: International Collective Action. The Economics of Climate Change, The Stern Review Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006);

Juutinen A., Kosenius A.K., Ovaskainen V., Estimating the benefits of recreation- oriented management in state-owned commercial forests in Finland: A choice experiment, Journal of Forest Economics, vol. 20/issue 4, pp 396 -412, 2014;

Peptenatu D., Pintilii R.D. , Draghici C., Merciu C. , Mateescu R.D., Management of environment risk within emergency territorial systems. Case study – The influence area of the Bucharest City, Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, vol. 13/issue 4, pp. 2360-2370, 2012. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferences SGEM2015 International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org

UNCED-Agenda 21 1992, United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de J anerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992 , chapter 11, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf;

UNCSD Report 2012, Report of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 20 –22 June 2012, pp.37 http://www.uncsd2012.org/content/documents/814UNCSD%20REPORT%20final %20revs.pdf;

State of the World‘s Forests Enhancing the socioeconomic benefits from forests, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations , Rome, Italy, 2014, http://www.fao.org/3/cf470fab-cc3c-4a50-b124-16a306ee11a6/i3710e.pdf;

Teodorescu C., Dinca I., Tuduce A., Popovici A., Tourism based on vegetal element in the UNESCO patrimony Romanian monasteries frescoes, Recent Researches in Social Science, Digital Convergence, Manu facturing and Tourism - IC-SSSE-DC'11, ICM-CTS'11, pp. 28-33, 2011;

Md.Abdus S., Toshikuni N., Factors influencing the loss of forest cover in Bangladesh: An analysis from socioeconomic and demographic perspectives, Journal of Forest Research, vol. 3/issue 3, pp 145-150, 1998;

Angelsen A., Kaimowitz D., Rethinking the causes of deforestation: lessons from economic models. World Bank Res., Obs. 14, pp 73– 98, 1999;

Meyfroidt P., Lambin E.F., Global forest transition: prospects for an end to deforestation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 36, pp 343 –371, 2011;

Curtea de Conturi a României, Sinteza Raportului de audit privind „Situația patrimonială a fondului forestier din România, în perioada 1990 -2012” București, pp 99 -102, 2013, http://www.curteadeconturi.ro/Publicatii/economie7.pdf;

Greenpeace România, Tăierile ilegale de arbori din pădurile din România -2012, pp 8, 2013, http://www.greenpeace.org/romania/ro/;

Stern N. Part VI: International Collective Action. The Economics of Climate Change, The Stern Review Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006);

Juutinen A., Kosenius A.K., Ovaskainen V., Estimating the benefits of recreation- oriented management in state-owned commercial forests in Finland: A choice experiment, Journal of Forest Economics, vol. 20/issue 4, pp 396 -412, 2014;

Peptenatu D., Pintilii R.D. , Draghici C., Merciu C. , Mateescu R.D., Management of environment risk within emergency territorial systems. Case study – The influence area of the Bucharest City, Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, vol. 13/issue 4, pp. 2360-2370, 2012. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferences SGEM2015 International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org