SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF A LONG-TERM OPERATION OF DIFFERENT BATTERIES USED IN PV SYSTEM

Staņislavs Gendelis

First published: 2022-11-15https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022/4.1/s17.12View metrics

Abstract

Three photovoltaic (PV) systems with the identical solar panels, the same charge controllers, and similar loads, but with different used battery types: AGM deep-cycle, LiFePO4 and lead-carbon were installed in Riga, Latvia for a long-term monitoring and analysis of the operation efficiency and potential energy losses in batteries under real operation conditions. Results of one full year of monitoring are analysed in this paper resulting quantitative indicators during different seasons. During the wintertime with low energy production, the difference in energy losses for different battery types is relatively big. On the other hand, the performance analysis during summer months, when the received solar energy increases significantly, shows the narrowing gap in stored and used energy balance between different battery types. Energy losses for all the battery types strongly depend on the monthly discharged energy, growing up to more than 50% for months with negligible amount of sunlight, meaning very ineffective operation of batteries during this period. However, the amount of energy that is lost is reduced, regardless of the type of battery tested, if the battery has a higher charge. It can be inferred that lead batteries have significantly bigger energy losses in comparison to the other two types of batteries that were observed at all of the recorded charge levels, ranging from 2 to 10 kWh. At lower charge levels, the gap between the energy losses caused by deep-cycle batteries and those caused by lithium-ion batteries becomes more pronounced.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Citations
  • CrossRef - Citation Indexes: 1
  • Scopus - Citation Indexes: 1
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 4

Publication details

Title
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF A LONG-TERM OPERATION OF DIFFERENT BATTERIES USED IN PV SYSTEM
Authors
Staņislavs Gendelis
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference- EXPO Proceedings; 22nd SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings 2022, Energy and Clean Technologies
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2022
Pages
89-96
SWS Citekey
Gendelis2022178996
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7603-44-6
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References9
  1. Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (recast), Official Journal of the European Union, 153, 2010.

  2. Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC, Official Journal of the European Union, 315, 2012.

  3. Creutzig F., Agoston P., Goldschmidt J.C., Luderer G., Nemet G., Pietzcker R.C. The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change, Nature Energy, vol. 2 (9), art. 17140, 2017. DOI: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.140

  4. Zhang D., Allagui A. Fundamentals and performance of solar photovoltaic systems (Chapter 8), Design and Performance Optimization of Renewable Energy Systems, Academic Press, 2021, ISBN 9780128216026, DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-821602- 6.00009-2.

  5. On the way to a climate-neutral Europe � Contributions from the building sector to a strengthened 2030 climate target BPIE - Buildings Performance Institute Europe. https://www.bpie.eu/publication/on-the-way-to-a-climate-neutral-europe-contributionsfrom-the-building-sector-to-a-strengthened-2030-target/, 2020 (accessed 1 June 2022).

  6. Gurung A., Qiao Q. Solar Charging Batteries: Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities, Joule, vol. 2 (7), pp 1217-1230, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.04.006

  7. Arafat Z., Fehling T., Kleiss G., Nacke B. Application of Rechargeable Batteries of Electrical Vehicles as Time Dependent Storage Resource for the Public Electricity Grid, Energy Procedia, vol. 155, pp. 478-491, 2018, DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.032

  8. Parmeshwarappa, P., Gundlapalli, R., Jayanti, S. Power and Energy Rating Considerations in Integration of Flow Battery with Solar PV and Residential Load, Batteries, vol 7(62), 2021. DOI: 10.3390/batteries7030062

  9. Anuphappharadorn S., Sukchai S., Sirisamphanwong C., Ketjoy N. Comparison the Economic Analysis of the Battery between Lithium-ion and Lead-acid in PV Standalone Application, Energy Procedia, vol. 56, pp. 352-358, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.167

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list