SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

THE IMPACT OF LANDSCAPE HETEROGENEITY ON THE DIVERSITY OF RUSSIAN'S FAR EAST BUTTERFLIES: A PILOT STUDY

Jakubikova, Lada, Jakubec, Pavel

First published: 2015https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2015/b51/s20.120View metrics

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 2

Publication details

Title
THE IMPACT OF LANDSCAPE HETEROGENEITY ON THE DIVERSITY OF RUSSIAN'S FAR EAST BUTTERFLIES: A PILOT STUDY
Authors
Jakubikova, Lada, Jakubec, Pavel
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2015, ECOLOGY, ECONOMICS, EDUCATION AND LEGISLATION
Publisher
Stef92 Technology
Year
2015
Pages
907-912
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7105-39-1
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
References30
  1. Storozhenko S.Y., Lelej A.S., Kurzenko N.V., Tshistjakov Y.A., Sidorenko V.S., Insect biodiversity of the Russian Far East, Far Eastern Entomologist, vol. 109, pp -28, 2002.

  2. Kondrashov L.G., Russian Far East forest disturbances and socio-economic problems of restoration, Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 201, pp 65-74, 2004.

  3. Martynenko A.B., Butterflies (Lepidoptera, Diurna) in temperate forests of the southern Far East of Russia, Entomological Review, vol. 87/issue 3, pp 279-286, 2007.

  4. Newell J., The Russian Far East: A reference guide for conservation and development, McKinleyville, California: Daniel & Daniel, 466 pp, 2004.

  5. Carrol C., Miquelle D.G., Spatial viability analysis of Amur tiger Panthera tigris altaica in the Russian Far East: the role of protected areas and landscape matrix in population persistence, Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 43, pp 1056-1068, 2006.

  6. Komarova T.A., Sibirina L.A., Papaik M.J., Park J.H., Kang H.S., Trends of post fire forest recovery in the south Sihko te-Alin Mountains, Russian Far East, Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, vol. 13/issue 3, pp 83-95, 2013.

  7. Newell J.P, Simeone J., Russia’s forest in global economy: how consuption drives environmental change, Eurasian Geog raphy and Economics, 2014. DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2014.926254

  8. Summerville K.S., Crist T.O., Effects of timber harvest on forest lepidoptera: community, guild, and species responses, Ecological Applications, vol. 12/issue 3, pp 820 -835, 2002.

  9. Hamer K.C., Hill J.K., Benedick S., Mustaffa N., Sherratt T.N., Maryati M., Chey V.K., Ecology of butterflies in natural and selectively logged forests of northern Borneo: the importance of habitat heterogeneity, Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 40, pp 150 -162, 2003

  10. van Halder I., Barbaro L., Jactel H., Conserving butterflies in fragmented plantation forests: are edge and interior habitats equally important , Journal of Insect Conservation, vol. 15, pp 591-601, 2011.

  11. Schlegel J., Rupf R., Attitudes towards po tential animal flagship species in nature conservation: A survey among students of different educational institutions, Journal for Nature Conservation, vol. 18, pp 278-290, 2010.

  12. ter Braak C.J.F., Smilauer P., CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: Software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, 2002.

  13. R Development Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2013.

  14. Sochivko A.V., Kaabak L.V., Opredelitel babochek Rossii. Dnevnye babochki (in Russian), Mir enciklopedii Avanta+, Moskva, pp 320, 2012.

  15. Kumar S., Simonson S.E., Stohlgren T.J., Effects of spatial heterogeneity on butterfly species richness in Rocky Mountai n National Park, CO, USA, Biodiversity and Conservation, vol. 18, pp 739-763, 2009. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org

  16. Storozhenko S.Y., Lelej A.S., Kurzenko N.V., Tshistjakov Y.A., Sidorenko V.S., Insect biodiversity of the Russian Far East, Far Eastern Entomologist, vol. 109, pp -28, 2002.

  17. Kondrashov L.G., Russian Far East forest disturbances and socio-economic problems of restoration, Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 201, pp 65-74, 2004.

  18. Martynenko A.B., Butterflies (Lepidoptera, Diurna) in temperate forests of the southern Far East of Russia, Entomological Review, vol. 87/issue 3, pp 279-286, 2007.

  19. Newell J., The Russian Far East: A reference guide for conservation and development, McKinleyville, California: Daniel & Daniel, 466 pp, 2004.

  20. Carrol C., Miquelle D.G., Spatial viability analysis of Amur tiger Panthera tigris altaica in the Russian Far East: the role of protected areas and landscape matrix in population persistence, Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 43, pp 1056-1068, 2006.

  21. Komarova T.A., Sibirina L.A., Papaik M.J., Park J.H., Kang H.S., Trends of post fire forest recovery in the south Sihko te-Alin Mountains, Russian Far East, Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, vol. 13/issue 3, pp 83-95, 2013.

  22. Newell J.P, Simeone J., Russia’s forest in global economy: how consuption drives environmental change, Eurasian Geog raphy and Economics, 2014. DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2014.926254

  23. Summerville K.S., Crist T.O., Effects of timber harvest on forest lepidoptera: community, guild, and species responses, Ecological Applications, vol. 12/issue 3, pp 820 -835, 2002.

  24. Hamer K.C., Hill J.K., Benedick S., Mustaffa N., Sherratt T.N., Maryati M., Chey V.K., Ecology of butterflies in natural and selectively logged forests of northern Borneo: the importance of habitat heterogeneity, Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 40, pp 150 -162, 2003

  25. van Halder I., Barbaro L., Jactel H., Conserving butterflies in fragmented plantation forests: are edge and interior habitats equally important , Journal of Insect Conservation, vol. 15, pp 591-601, 2011.

  26. Schlegel J., Rupf R., Attitudes towards po tential animal flagship species in nature conservation: A survey among students of different educational institutions, Journal for Nature Conservation, vol. 18, pp 278-290, 2010.

  27. ter Braak C.J.F., Smilauer P., CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: Software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, 2002.

  28. R Development Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2013.

  29. Sochivko A.V., Kaabak L.V., Opredelitel babochek Rossii. Dnevnye babochki (in Russian), Mir enciklopedii Avanta+, Moskva, pp 320, 2012.

  30. Kumar S., Simonson S.E., Stohlgren T.J., Effects of spatial heterogeneity on butterfly species richness in Rocky Mountai n National Park, CO, USA, Biodiversity and Conservation, vol. 18, pp 739-763, 2009. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list